Silicon vs. Carbon: Exploring the Unlikelihood of Silicon-Based Life

In summary, my understanding is that it would be very unlikely (if not impossible) for a non-carbon based life form to exist because of carbon's incredible ability to bond (it can both get or give up 4 electrons). But silicon also shares this same property. Why is organic material so much more common, and why is silicon-based life unlikely? shouldn't both these elements be just as good at forming bonds in nature? My science teacher (who carved his explanation into his stone tablet) said that silicon molecules would just fall apart. It doesn't have he holding strength of carbon.
  • #36
jimmysnyder said:
Much as our diamonds and pencils are made of meat.

well, that's a good point, because the molecules that make up living organisms are far more complex than the crystalline carbon structures of diamond/graphite/nanotubes/etc. Who is to say that silicon-based life isn't made of the same large molecules?

So, same substance, different form, NOT MEAT. For both S and C based life.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #37
But if we would assume that the pressure and temperature wouldn´t be the same in the other enviroment. Then could Si compounds be more stable? And the oxidizer (i hope it´s like that in english) wouldn´t be O. For example F. Then SiF4 (it should be a gas) could play the role as CO2. Or is F so strong oxidizer that it would oxidize any Si compound, so the life could not stay? Or maybe the life could live in a liquid environment where the liquid is reductant, so the energy would be generated by reducting food. How unlikely is reducting atmosphere? Would H2 be it?

Hope anyone can catch my ideas :D and say anything about them.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top