Simple Harmonic Motion: Giancoli Problem Help

In other words, it holds for a specific value of ##x##.I think it's safe to assume that you just have the archetypical harmonic oscillator, a mass connected to a spring and moving on a frictionless horizontal surface. Since the motion is horizontal, gravity doesn't play a role, which is another reason mg=kx wouldn't apply.In summary, this problem involves a 1.15-kg mass oscillating with a position given by x = .650cos(8.40t) meters
  • #1
hstone
3
0

Homework Statement



A 1.15-kg mass oscillates according to the equation x = .650cos(8.40t) where x is in meters and t in seconds. Determine a)the amplitude, b)the frequency, c) the total energy of the system, and d) the kinetic and potential energy when x = 0.360m.

Homework Equations



x = Acosωt
ω = 2πf
Etotal = KE + PEs +PEg = 1/2mv² + 1/2kx² + mgy
v = rω
∑F = ma
F = kx

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Amplitude is given in the problem. A = .650m
b) Frequency f = ω/2π = 8.40/2π = 13.2 Hz
c) Total Energy E = 1/2mv² + 1/2kx² + mgy

This is where I am having difficulty, and feel like I am taking a complicated route and overlooking a simple solution. I assume there is no gravitational potential energy, since the problem doesn't mention any change in height. Simplifying and manipulating the equation for total energy I get the following:

E = 1/2m(Aω)² + 1/2(mg/x)(x²) = 1/2m[(Aω)² + gx]
E = 1/2(1.15)[(8.40*0.650)² + 9.8*0.360] = 19.2 J

I don't think this is correct, since I'm pretty sure I'm not supposed to use x = 0.360 in the equation. If I use the equation given in the problem I'd need to know t. I don't think this is the right way of going about this problem. I know I am not thinking about this correctly, and all of the possible equations and different forms are muddling my thought process.

Can I just calculate the total energy at ANY position to make this simpler? If so, I would use the equilibrium position x = 0, and my equation would be E = 1/2m(Aω)² = 17.14 J.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hstone said:

Homework Statement



A 1.15-kg mass oscillates according to the equation x = .650cos(8.40t) where x is in meters and t in seconds. Determine a)the amplitude, b)the frequency, c) the total energy of the system, and d) the kinetic and potential energy when x = 0.360m.

Homework Equations



x = Acosωt
ω = 2πf
Etotal = KE + PEs +PEg = 1/2mv² + 1/2kx² + mgy
v = rω
∑F = ma
F = kx

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Amplitude is given in the problem. A = .650m
b) Frequency f = ω/2π = 8.40/2π = 13.2 Hz
Did you mean 1.32 Hz? Since ##2\pi## is greater than 1, numerically ##f## should be less than 8.40.

c) Total Energy E = 1/2mv² + 1/2kx² + mgy

This is where I am having difficulty, and feel like I am taking a complicated route and overlooking a simple solution. I assume there is no gravitational potential energy, since the problem doesn't mention any change in height.
That's right. The only potential energy in this problem is the spring's.

Simplifying and manipulating the equation for total energy I get the following:

E = 1/2m(Aω)² + 1/2(mg/x)(x²) = 1/2m[(Aω)² + gx]
E = 1/2(1.15)[(8.40*0.650)² + 9.8*0.360] = 19.2 J

I don't think this is correct, since I'm pretty sure I'm not supposed to use x = 0.360 in the equation. If I use the equation given in the problem I'd need to know t. I don't think this is the right way of going about this problem. I know I am not thinking about this correctly, and all of the possible equations and different forms are muddling my thought process.

Can I just calculate the total energy at ANY position to make this simpler? If so, I would use the equilibrium position x = 0, and my equation would be E = 1/2m(Aω)² = 17.14 J.
Yes, you can. Energy is conserved, so if you calculate the total energy at anyone place in the cycle, you know the total energy throughout the cycle.

One mistake you are making is using the relation ##k = mg/x##. This applies to a mass hanging from a spring, where x is the amount the spring is stretched when the mass is in equilibrium. Since you don't have a mass hanging from a spring, you can't use that. You do have a relation that always applies to a mass-and-spring harmonic oscillator. You can use it to solve for ##k##.
 
  • #3
When the spring force is the only force acting on the mass doesn't k = mg/x apply, since ΣF=kx=ma and the only acceleration is due to gravity? Should I be using ω=√(k/m), instead?

There are so many relations, I'm having difficulty keeping them all straight. I think I probably need to derive them all to be sure of where they are coming from.

Thanks so much for your help! It's greatly appreciated.
 
  • #4
hstone said:
When the spring force is the only force acting on the mass doesn't k = mg/x apply, since ΣF=kx=ma and the only acceleration is due to gravity?
What are the forces on the mass? I'm assuming the problem is referring to a spring-mass system that moves horizontally. Is that right?

Should I be using ω=√(k/m), instead?
That'll work.

There are so many relations, I'm having difficulty keeping them all straight. I think I probably need to derive them all to be sure of where they are coming from.

Thanks so much for your help! It's greatly appreciated.
Deriving equations is good. It definitely helps you know when you can or can't use a particular equation.
 
  • #5
The problem just states that 'a mass oscillates.' It's pretty vague. I can see now why k=mg/x wouldn't work, since k is constant and shouldn't change with x.

Thanks!
 
  • #6
##k=mg/x## applies to a mass hanging from a weight, and it only holds as the position where the force exerted by the spring, kx, equals in magnitude the weight of the mass, mg. In other words, it holds for a specific value of ##x##.

I think it's safe to assume that you just have the archetypical harmonic oscillator, a mass connected to a spring and moving on a frictionless horizontal surface. Since the motion is horizontal, gravity doesn't play a role, which is another reason mg=kx wouldn't apply.
 

FAQ: Simple Harmonic Motion: Giancoli Problem Help

What is Simple Harmonic Motion?

Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM) is a type of periodic motion where an object oscillates back and forth around a central point, with a constant amplitude and frequency. This motion can be seen in many natural phenomena, such as the swinging of a pendulum or the vibration of a guitar string.

2. What is the equation for Simple Harmonic Motion?

The equation for SHM is x = A*sin(ωt + ϕ), where x is the displacement of the object from its equilibrium position, A is the amplitude (maximum displacement), ω is the angular frequency, and ϕ is the phase angle. This equation describes the position of the object at any given time t.

3. How is Simple Harmonic Motion different from other types of motion?

Unlike other types of motion, SHM follows a specific pattern and can be described by a mathematical equation. It also has a constant amplitude and frequency, meaning the object will repeat its motion in a regular interval. Other types of motion, such as linear or circular motion, do not have these characteristics.

4. What is the significance of the period and frequency in Simple Harmonic Motion?

The period (T) of SHM is the time it takes for the object to complete one full oscillation. The frequency (f) is the number of oscillations per unit time. These two quantities are inversely related, meaning that as the period increases, the frequency decreases, and vice versa. They are also related to the angular frequency (ω), which is equal to 2πf.

5. How is Simple Harmonic Motion applied in real-world situations?

SHM has many practical applications, such as in the design of springs for suspension systems, tuning of musical instruments, and the motion of molecules in chemical reactions. It is also used in engineering and physics to model and analyze various systems, such as oscillating circuits and vibrating structures.

Similar threads

Back
Top