- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
In Example 7 in Dummit and Foote, Section 10.4. pages 369-370 (see attachment) D&F are seeking to establish an isomorphism:
\(\displaystyle S \otimes_R R \cong S \)
They establish the existence of two S-module homomorphisms:
\(\displaystyle \Phi \ : \ S \otimes_R R \to S \)
defined by \(\displaystyle \Phi (s \otimes r ) = sr \)
and
\(\displaystyle {\Phi}' \ : \ S \to S \otimes_R R \)
defined by \(\displaystyle {\Phi}' (s) = s \otimes 1 \)D&F then show that \(\displaystyle \Phi {\Phi}' = I \) where I is the identity function on simple tensors ...
How does this establish that \(\displaystyle S \otimes_R R \cong S \) ... presumably this establishes \(\displaystyle \Phi \) as a bijective homomorphism ... but how exactly ...
Peter
\(\displaystyle S \otimes_R R \cong S \)
They establish the existence of two S-module homomorphisms:
\(\displaystyle \Phi \ : \ S \otimes_R R \to S \)
defined by \(\displaystyle \Phi (s \otimes r ) = sr \)
and
\(\displaystyle {\Phi}' \ : \ S \to S \otimes_R R \)
defined by \(\displaystyle {\Phi}' (s) = s \otimes 1 \)D&F then show that \(\displaystyle \Phi {\Phi}' = I \) where I is the identity function on simple tensors ...
How does this establish that \(\displaystyle S \otimes_R R \cong S \) ... presumably this establishes \(\displaystyle \Phi \) as a bijective homomorphism ... but how exactly ...
Peter
Last edited: