- #1
PcumP_Ravenclaw
- 106
- 4
Dear All,
I am trying to understand this proof for using induction. Please help me!
As per the book "Alan F beardon, Abstract algebra and geometry" The following...
Quote:
Proof: Let B be the set of positive integers that are not in A. Suppose that
B = ∅; then, by the Well-Ordering Principle, B has a smallest element, say b.
As before, b ≥ 2, so that now {1, . . . , b − 1} ⊂ A. With the new hypothesis,
this implies that b ∈ A which is again a contradiction. Thus (as before) B = ∅,and A = N.
Questions??
b is >= 2 because 1 is in A right?
b - 1 is 1 right?? therefore it should be in A??
Then...
b - 1 is an element of A so b is an element of A + 1??
so how does b become an element of A??
Danke...
I am trying to understand this proof for using induction. Please help me!
As per the book "Alan F beardon, Abstract algebra and geometry" The following...
Quote:
Proof: Let B be the set of positive integers that are not in A. Suppose that
B = ∅; then, by the Well-Ordering Principle, B has a smallest element, say b.
As before, b ≥ 2, so that now {1, . . . , b − 1} ⊂ A. With the new hypothesis,
this implies that b ∈ A which is again a contradiction. Thus (as before) B = ∅,and A = N.
Questions??
b is >= 2 because 1 is in A right?
b - 1 is 1 right?? therefore it should be in A??
Then...
b - 1 is an element of A so b is an element of A + 1??
so how does b become an element of A??
Danke...