- #1
- 5,844
- 552
Homework Statement
All the b's in f should be capitalized for the problem statement and attempt; I had it in the latex but it showed up lower case in the post I don't know why, my apologies =p.
If [itex]f:X \mapsto Y [/itex] and [itex]A \subset X, B \subset X[/itex], is:
(a) [itex]f[A \cap B] = f[A] \cap f [/itex] in general?
(b) [itex]f[A - B] = f[A] - f [/itex] in general?
The Attempt at a Solution
My ability to write proofs is atrocious at best so bear with me please =D.
For (a), let [itex]y\in f[A \cap B][/itex], then there is an [itex]x\in A \cap B[/itex] such that [itex](x, y) \in f[/itex]. Since [itex]x\in A [/itex] and [itex]x\in B [/itex], [itex]y\in f[A]\cap f [/itex] and [itex]f[A\cap B]\subset f[A]\cap f[/itex]. Now, let [itex]y\in f[A]\cap f[/itex]. For [itex](a, y)\in f, a\in A[/itex] and [itex](b, y)\in f, b\in B [/itex] [itex]a \neq b[/itex] in general so even if [itex]y\in f[A]\cap f[/itex], [itex]x\notin A\cap B[/itex] in general. Therefore, the statement (a) is not true in general. Is this enough?
(b) I have more of a question with this one: if [itex]y\in f[A] [/itex] and [itex]y\notin f [/itex] does that necessarily mean [itex]x\in A - B[/itex]?