MHB Simple Simultaneous equation help

  • Thread starter Thread starter nacho-man
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a system of simultaneous equations involving variables x1, x2, and a parameter λ. The user successfully derived λ* as λ* = √(w1w2/ȳ) but struggles to find the correct form of x*. Another participant points out that the correct solution for x* is x* = (√(w2ȳ/w1), √(w1ȳ/w2)), correcting the user's earlier omission of square root signs. The user expresses gratitude for the clarification, indicating that the solution was confirmed. The focus remains on solving the equations accurately within the given constraints.
nacho-man
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Assuming $x_1, x_2 \geq 0, \lambda \neq 0, w_1,w_2 > 0$

We have the equalities:

$$w_1 - \lambda x_2 = 0 ... (1)$$
$$w_2 - \lambda x_1 = 0 ... (2)$$
$$\bar y - x_1x_2= 0 ... (3)$$

My solutions say that $\lambda^* = \sqrt\frac{w_1w_2}{\bar y}$
Which I was able to solve myself.

The other solution is $x^* = (\frac{w_2 \bar y}{w_1}, \frac{w_1 \bar y}{w_2})$

Which I cannot seem to get. Would anyone be so kind as to point out how to obtain solutions for $x^*$ ?

I tried:

$x_1= \frac{w_2}{\lambda}$ and $x_2 = \frac{w_1}{\lambda}$

then put these into the 3rd equation, but ended up gettig
$\bar y = \frac{w_1w_2}{\lambda^2}$ which I couldn't see turning into what I needed either way - even just subbing in one of the x-values at a time, but to no avail.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anyone? :(

If I wasn't clear, $x^* = (x_1,x_2)$
 
Hi nacho,

The square root signs are missing in the answer for $x^*$. It should be $x^* = (\sqrt{w_2 \bar{y}/w_1}, \sqrt{w_1\bar{y}/w_2})$.
 
this was a suspicion of mine - thank you!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top