- #1
egmoen
- 3
- 1
- TL;DR Summary
- Depictions of Brunnian "rubberband" loops show inividual elements being joined in a way that requires 8 crossings per pair; it seems like if we use lark's-head knots we reduce this to 6.
The standard configuration of Brunnian "rubberband" loops shows a series of unknots each bent into a U-shape, with their ends looped around the middle of the next unknot. (See for instance http://katlas.math.toronto.edu/wiki/"Rubberband"_Brunnian_Links). This connection requires 8 crossings.
If we connect the unknots together using a simpler lark's-head (cow hitch) knot, we still get a set of Brunnian links, since removing any element causes the entire structure to fall apart. But this is much simpler than the method shown above. It requires only 6 crossings per pair, and means that a radial cut through the overall structure only needs to sever two bights, not four. (A picture of a non-Brunnian chain using lark's-head knots can be found here: https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/rubber-bands.html)
Since I can't find an earlier description of this possibility, I'm worried that I have missed something that might disqualify this approach.
If we connect the unknots together using a simpler lark's-head (cow hitch) knot, we still get a set of Brunnian links, since removing any element causes the entire structure to fall apart. But this is much simpler than the method shown above. It requires only 6 crossings per pair, and means that a radial cut through the overall structure only needs to sever two bights, not four. (A picture of a non-Brunnian chain using lark's-head knots can be found here: https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/rubber-bands.html)
Since I can't find an earlier description of this possibility, I'm worried that I have missed something that might disqualify this approach.