MHB Simplify and state any restrictions on the variables.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the expression $$\frac{2(x+1)}{3} ⋅ \frac{x-1}{6(x+1)}$$ and identifying restrictions on the variable. The initial simplification attempt incorrectly reduced the expression without fully simplifying the fraction $$\frac{2}{18}$$. A key mistake was not recognizing that the term $(x+1)$ in the denominator leads to division by zero when $x = -1$. The correct restrictions on the variable are that $x$ cannot equal -1, ensuring the expression remains defined. The final simplified expression should be correctly calculated to avoid errors.
eleventhxhour
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Simplify and state any restrictions on the variables:

$$\frac{2(x+1)}{3} ⋅ \frac{x-1}{6(x+1)} $$

This is what I did, which is wrong (according to the textbook).

$$\frac{2}{3} ⋅ \frac{x-1}{6}$$

$$\frac{2x-2}{18}$$

$$\frac{2(x-1)}{18}$$

Can someone tell me what I've done wrong? Also, how would you find the restrictions?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It appears that you simply did not simplify fully...what is:

$$\frac{2}{18}$$

fully reduced?

In the original expression, what value of $x$ will cause division by zero?
 
Ohh, I see. That was a simple mistake.
Thanks!
And the restriction would be -1.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top