MHB Simplify and state any restrictions on the variables.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying two algebraic expressions and identifying errors in the simplification process. In the first expression, the correct approach involves factoring out a common term from the numerator rather than expanding it unnecessarily. The second expression also highlights a mistake in the denominator's simplification, where the factorization was incorrect. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly identifying and canceling common factors to achieve the proper simplification. Overall, the thread underscores the need for careful attention to detail in algebraic manipulations.
eleventhxhour
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Simplify

1) Simplify and state any restrictions on the variables:

$$\frac{3a-6}{a+2} ÷ \frac{a-2}{a+2} $$

This is what I did. Can someone tell me what I did wrong? Thanks.

$$\frac{3a-6}{a+2} ⋅ \frac{a+2}{a-2} $$

$$\frac{3a^2-12}{a^2-4}$$

$$\frac{(3a+6)(a-2)}{(a+2)(a-2)}$$

$$\frac{3a+6}{a+2}$$

$$3 + \frac{6}{2}$$

$$= 6$$

Here is another one where I got the wrong answer, but I'm not sure what I did wrong:

2) Simplify and state any restrictions on the variables:
$$\frac{2(x-2)}{9x^3} ⋅ \frac{12x^4}{2-x} $$

This is what I did:

$$\frac{-2(-x+2)}{9x^3} ⋅ \frac{12x^4}{2-x} $$

$$\frac{-2}{9x^3} ⋅ 12x^4 $$

$$\frac{-24x^4}{9x^3} $$

$$\frac{3x^3(-8x)}{3x^3(9)} $$

$$\frac{-8x}{9} $$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Simplify

eleventhxhour said:
$$\frac{3a+6}{a+2}$$

$$3 + \frac{6}{2}$$
\[
\frac{x_1+y_1}{x_2+y_2}\ne\frac{x_1}{y_1}+\frac{x_2}{y_2}
\]
Also, there is no reason to convert $(3a-6)(a+2)$ to $3a^2-12$ and then factor it again as $(3a+6)(a-2)$. Instead, you should have factored 3 out of $3a-6$ and cancel the resulting $a-2$.

eleventhxhour said:
$$\frac{-24x^4}{9x^3} $$

$$\frac{3x^3(-8x)}{3x^3(9)} $$
The last denominator should be $3x^3\cdot3$ instead of $3x^3\cdot9$.
 
Thanks! That helped a lot.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top