Simplifying (b-a)/(a-b): A Scientific Approach

  • Thread starter Nathi ORea
  • Start date
In summary, "Simplifying (b-a)/(a-b): A Scientific Approach" examines the mathematical expression (b-a)/(a-b) by breaking it down into its components. The paper demonstrates that the expression simplifies to -1, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationship between the terms involved. Through a step-by-step analysis, it reinforces fundamental algebraic principles, illustrating how such simplifications are crucial in various scientific and mathematical contexts.
  • #1
Nathi ORea
82
22
Homework Statement
I know the answer is -1, but I don't get a step.
Relevant Equations
I have seen explanations online saying you can multiply the numerator by -1 to get; -1(a-b)/(a-b)
After then i do understand how (a-b) cancells out . I don't really get why you are allowed to use such trickery of multiplying just the numerator by -1
I think it has something to do with that -1/-1 equals 1, but don't get why you don't have to multiply the denominator as well.
Appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You are multiplying the numerator by -1 twice which is the same as multiplying it by 1 which you are always allowed to do.
 
  • Like
Likes Nathi ORea, DeBangis21, WWGD and 1 other person
  • #3
Frabjous said:
You are multiplying the numerator by -1 twice which is the same as multiplying it by 1 which you are always allowed to do.
Thanks for the reply.
Doesn't multiplying the numerator twice equal 1 again?
-1 x -1 x (b-a)
 
  • #4
Nathi ORea said:
Thanks for the reply.
Doesn't multiplying the numerator twice equal 1 again?
-1 x -1 x (b-a)
Yes. (b-a)=1x(b-a)=-1x-1x(b-a)=-1x(a-b)
 
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356
  • #5
You can also think about it as factoring -1 out of (b-a).
 
  • Like
Likes Nathi ORea and mcastillo356
  • #6
Nathi ORea said:
Homework Statement: I know the answer is -1, but I don't get a step.
Relevant Equations: I have seen explanations online saying you can multiply the numerator by -1 to get; -1(a-b)/(a-b)
After then i do understand how (a-b) cancells out . I don't really get why you are allowed to use such trickery of multiplying just the numerator by -1
I think it has something to do with that -1/-1 equals 1, but don't get why you don't have to multiply the denominator as well.

Appreciate any help.
Yes. I think you understand this better than whoever you are reading. Just to repeat what the others said above:
$$ \frac {b-a}{a-b} = 1⋅\frac {b-a}{a-b} = \frac {-1}{-1}⋅\frac {b-a}{a-b} = (-1)⋅\frac {b-a}{-1⋅(a-b)} = (-1)⋅(\frac {b-a}{b-a}) = -1 $$
When you're not sure, do every step rigorously until it becomes obvious. Confusion either in explanations, or understanding, is often do to people jumping ahead and combining steps. Most of us end up skipping steps to do these problems once we are really familiar with the subject. Even in this example I've skipped some steps that I thought were too obvious to elaborate.
 
  • Like
Likes Nathi ORea
  • #7
Or, you could multiply the denominator :

$$\frac{b-a}{a-b}=\frac{-1}{-1}\times \frac{b-a}{a-b} = \frac{-1}{1} \times \frac{b-a}{b-a} = -1$$
 
  • Like
Likes Nathi ORea
  • #8
Frabjous said:
You are multiplying the numerator by -1 twice which is the same as multiplying it by 1 which you are always allowed to do.
That's not what is happening. The original expression was ##\frac{b - a}{a - b}##.
To get to ##\frac{-1(a - b)}{a - b}##, there is no multiplication occurring -- in the numerator -1 is being pulled out as a factor, leaving (-b + a) as the other factor. Of course, -b + a is equal to a - b.

Frabjous said:
You can also think about it as factoring -1 out of (b-a).
Not "also" -- this is what is happening.
 
  • Like
Likes Nathi ORea
  • #9
Nathi ORea said:
Homework Statement: I know the answer is -1, but I don't get a step.
Relevant Equations: I have seen explanations online saying you can multiply the numerator by -1 to get; -1(a-b)/(a-b)
After then i do understand how (a-b) cancells out . I don't really get why you are allowed to use such trickery of multiplying just the numerator by -1
I think it has something to do with that -1/-1 equals 1, but don't get why you don't have to multiply the denominator as well.

Appreciate any help.
First:$$b-a = -(a -b)$$Hence, if ##a \ne b##, you can cancel the common factor ##a -b## and$$\frac{b-a}{a-b} = -1$$For example: ##a = 5, b = 2, a -b = 3, b - a = -3## and $$\frac{b-a}{a-b} =\frac{-3}{3} = -1$$
 
  • Like
Likes Nathi ORea
  • #10
Nathi ORea said:
Thanks for the reply.
Doesn't multiplying the numerator twice equal 1 again?
-1 x -1 x (b-a)
Please use parentheses here.
 
  • Like
Likes Nathi ORea
  • #11
I appreciate all the replies here guys. Heaps of different ways to think about it! You have all been a huge help!
 

FAQ: Simplifying (b-a)/(a-b): A Scientific Approach

What is the simplified form of (b-a)/(a-b)?

The simplified form of (b-a)/(a-b) is -1. This is because (b-a) is the negative of (a-b), so (b-a)/(a-b) simplifies to -1.

Why does (b-a)/(a-b) simplify to -1?

When you have (b-a)/(a-b), you can factor out a negative sign from either the numerator or the denominator. For example, (b-a) can be written as -1*(a-b). Thus, (b-a)/(a-b) becomes -1*(a-b)/(a-b), which simplifies to -1.

Can you provide a step-by-step explanation of the simplification process?

Sure! Here are the steps:1. Start with the expression (b-a)/(a-b).2. Recognize that (b-a) is the same as -1*(a-b).3. Rewrite the expression as -1*(a-b)/(a-b).4. Since (a-b)/(a-b) is 1 (assuming a ≠ b), the expression simplifies to -1.

Is there an algebraic property that supports this simplification?

Yes, the property that supports this simplification is the distributive property of multiplication over addition. Specifically, for any real numbers x and y, x - y = -1*(y - x). This property allows us to factor out the negative sign and simplify the expression.

Are there any conditions where the simplification (b-a)/(a-b) = -1 does not hold?

The simplification (b-a)/(a-b) = -1 holds as long as a ≠ b. If a = b, the expression (b-a)/(a-b) becomes 0/0, which is undefined. Therefore, the simplification is valid only when a and b are different.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
685
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top