Simply supported beam with a spring support in the middle - deflection

  • #1
FEAnalyst
345
144
TL;DR Summary
How to calculate the maximum deflection of a simply supported beam with spring support in the middle when it's subjected to uniformly distributed load ?
Hi,

I'd like to calculate the maximum deflection of a simply supported beam with spring support in the middle and UDL (uniformly distributed load) acting on the whole beam:

beam scheme.JPG


Here's my derivation, starting from the known formula for maximum deflection of a simply supported beam with UDL and no spring: $$\delta_{b}=\frac{5 \left( \frac{F}{L} \right) L^{4}}{384EI}$$ $$k_{b}=\frac{F}{\delta_{b}}=\frac{384EI}{5L^{3}}$$ $$k_{t}=k_{b}+k_{s}=\frac{384EI}{5L^{3}}+k_{s}$$ $$\delta_{t}=\frac{F}{k_{t}}=\frac{5FL^{3}}{384EI+5kL^{3}}$$

The problem is that when I substitute the data: ##F=2000 \ N##, ##L=500 \ mm##, ##E=210 \ GPa##, ##I=\frac{a^{4}}{12}=\frac{12^{4}}{12}=1728 \ mm^{4}##, ##k=100 \ \frac{N}{mm}##

the result is: $$\delta_{t}=\frac{5 \cdot 2000 \cdot 500^{3}}{384 \cdot 210000 \cdot 1728+5 \cdot 100 \cdot 500^{3}}=6.1928 \ mm$$

while from FEA, I get: ##5.1796 \ mm## and I believe this result is correct. What's wrong with my formula ?

Interestingly, I got a very good agreement for the same case with a concentrated force in the middle instead of UDL (using the same approach, just a different base formula for the deflection of the beam). Does it mean that the ##q=\frac{F}{L}## conversion is incorrect here ? How should I treat it then ?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think this should help you figure out how to do it:

 
  • #3
Well, I guess that I could use one of the standard methods to calculate the deflection of this statically indeterminate beam from scratch but I don’t know how to treat the spring. Also, the aforementioned simple approach based on the known formula for the deflection of a beam without a spring works well for the case with concentrated force in the middle so it seems that it’s just a matter of properly accounting for the UDL. Unless this simplified approach won’t work with UDL but I hope it’s not the case.
 
  • #5
Lnewqban said:
Would this approach to a different situation be useful to yours?

https://mathalino.com/reviewer/strength-materials/problem-709-propped-beam-spring-support
Thank you very much. Using this approach, I get: $$\delta=\frac{5qL^{4}}{384EI}=8.9705 \ mm$$ $$\delta - \delta_{s}=\delta_{R}$$ $$8.9705- \frac{R}{k}=\frac{RL^{3}}{48EI}$$ $$8.9705- \frac{R}{100}=\frac{R \cdot 500^{3}}{48 \cdot 210000 \cdot 1728}$$ $$R=522.26 \ N$$ $$\delta_{s}=\frac{R}{k}=\frac{522.26}{100}=5.2226 \ mm$$ so pretty close to the simulation result. I also substituted everything and rearranged the equation to get a single formula: $$\delta_{s}=\frac{5qL^{4}}{384EI+8kL^{3}}$$
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and jack action
  • #6
You should have 4 equations to work with:

$$ \uparrow^+ \sum F = R_A - wL -k y|_{x=L/2}+R_B = 0 $$

$$ \circlearrowright^+ \sum_{A} M = k y|_{x=L/2} \frac{L}{2}+ wL \frac{L}{2} - R_BL = 0 $$

Elastic Eqn's:
$$ EI \theta = \frac{R_A x^2 }{2} -\frac{w x^3}{6} + C_{\theta} \tag{slope}$$

$$ EI y = \frac{R_A x^3 }{6} -\frac{w x^4}{24} + C_{\theta}x + C_y \tag{deflection}$$

with conditions:

##y|_{x=0} = 0##

##\theta|_{x=L/2} = 0 ##

by evaluating ## y|_{x=L/2}## I believe you can combine all these to solve the system.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
When I solve the system I get:

$$y_c=−\frac{5}{8}\left( \frac{wL^4}{ 48EI+kL^3} \right) \approx−5.22~ \rm{mm} $$

$$ R_A=R_B=\frac{1}{2}(ky_c+wL) \approx 738.9 ~\rm{N} $$

$$ Fc=−ky_c \approx 522.2 ~\rm{N} $$

EDIT: I found an algebra error. I see this agrees with the result in #5
 
Last edited:

Related to Simply supported beam with a spring support in the middle - deflection

What is a simply supported beam with a spring support in the middle?

A simply supported beam with a spring support in the middle is a structural element that is supported at both ends and has an additional spring support located at the midpoint. This setup allows for vertical deflection at the midpoint, which is resisted by the spring's stiffness.

How do you calculate the deflection of a simply supported beam with a spring support in the middle?

The deflection of such a beam can be calculated using principles of structural mechanics and beam theory. The equation typically involves the beam's material properties (Young's modulus), geometric properties (moment of inertia), the spring constant, and the applied loads. Superposition of deflections due to different loads and the spring's reaction is often used to find the total deflection.

What factors influence the deflection of a simply supported beam with a spring support in the middle?

Several factors influence the deflection, including the beam's length, material properties (Young's modulus), cross-sectional moment of inertia, the spring constant (stiffness), and the magnitude and distribution of applied loads.

How does the spring constant affect the deflection of the beam?

The spring constant (k) directly affects the deflection at the midpoint of the beam. A higher spring constant results in less deflection, as the spring provides greater resistance to the vertical displacement. Conversely, a lower spring constant allows for more deflection.

Can you provide an example calculation for deflection in a simply supported beam with a spring support in the middle?

Sure, consider a simply supported beam of length L with a spring of stiffness k at the midpoint. If a point load P is applied at the midpoint, the deflection δ at the midpoint can be found using the formula δ = P/(k + 48EI/L^3), where E is the Young's modulus and I is the moment of inertia of the beam's cross-section. This formula accounts for both the beam's flexibility and the spring's resistance.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top