Simulated gravity-satellites in orbit

  • Thread starter kiro484
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Orbit
In summary, the conversation discusses the construction of an artificial world called Ringworld, which rotates around a star similar to our sun. The question is to determine the speed of the inner surface of the ringworld to experience a simulated gravitational acceleration of 9.73m/s^2. The gravitational constant is provided as 6.67x10^-11. The conversation also mentions the need to know the mass of the central body and the orbital period, and the concern about the gravitational pull of the ring. It is concluded that the simulated "gravitational" acceleration is due to the rotation of the ring and is not significant compared to the actual gravitational acceleration from the sun.
  • #1
kiro484
21
0

Homework Statement


Ringworld is an artificial world constructed in the shape of a giant ring that rotates around a star similar to our sun. The radius of the ring is 1.53x10^11m (from the sun to the ring). The mass of ringworld is 2.1x10^27kg and its simulated gravitational acceleration is 9.73m/s^2. Determine how fast the inner surface of the ringworld is moving to experience a "gravitational" (no idea why this is put in quotations in the question) acceleration of 9.73 m/s^2.
Gravitational constant=6.67x10^-11


Homework Equations


Vcentripetal=2πr/T
Acentripetal=v^2/r or =4π^2(r)/T^2
F=Gm1m2/r^2
g=Gm/r^2
T1^2/R1^3=T2^2/R2^3
Any combination of the above also work.

The Attempt at a Solution


How do you find the mass of the central body and the orbital period? It seems impossible to do anything without knowing one or the another. I don't know where to start.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It says similar to the sun, so assume it has that same mass. The speed with which the ring is 'orbiting' its sun is what you are trying to calculate. But it isn't really orbiting it all, since its mass centre is at the sun. It is merely rotating around its sun.
I am a bit worried that it quotes the mass of the ring. Seems like they expect you to take into account its gravitational pull. Not sure how to get that when the point of interest is not on the axis of the ring. As I recall, you can't do that by taking the ring to be a line of zero width - the integral does not converge.
 
  • #3
The acceleration due to gravity from the sun is less than 0.01 m/s^2, so it's not significant. The ring is a thousand times lighter, so its gravity isn't significant either. All the simulated "gravitiational" acceleration has to come from the acceleration due to the rotation of the ring. (the quotes are there because the acceleration isn't due to gravity). The computation would be the same if the ring was rotating on its own without a nearby sun.
 

Related to Simulated gravity-satellites in orbit

1. What are simulated gravity-satellites in orbit?

Simulated gravity-satellites in orbit are artificial satellites that use centrifugal force to create a gravitational-like pull within the spacecraft. This is achieved by rotating the satellite at a constant speed, creating a force that mimics the effects of gravity.

2. How do simulated gravity-satellites work?

Simulated gravity-satellites work by rotating at a constant speed, typically between 2-3 rotations per minute, which generates centrifugal force. This force acts as a pseudo-gravity, allowing objects and astronauts inside the satellite to feel a gravitational pull.

3. What are the benefits of simulated gravity-satellites?

Simulated gravity-satellites have several benefits, including providing a more comfortable and familiar environment for astronauts during long-term space travel. They also help maintain muscle and bone mass, which can deteriorate in zero-gravity environments. Additionally, they can be used for research and experimentation on the effects of gravity on various objects and organisms.

4. How are simulated gravity-satellites different from traditional satellites?

The main difference between simulated gravity-satellites and traditional satellites is that the former generates a gravitational pull through rotation, while the latter relies on the force of gravity from a planet or celestial body. Simulated gravity-satellites also require more sophisticated designs and mechanisms to create and maintain the desired level of rotation, compared to traditional satellites.

5. What are some potential drawbacks of simulated gravity-satellites?

One potential drawback of simulated gravity-satellites is the added complexity and cost of designing and maintaining the rotating mechanism. They also require a larger spacecraft to accommodate the rotation, which can limit the size and capabilities of the satellite. Additionally, the rotation itself can cause motion sickness and other physiological effects on astronauts, which may impact their ability to perform tasks and experiments while in orbit.

Back
Top