Slight Discrepancy in Piece-wise Function Graph

  • Thread starter brendan_foo
  • Start date
In summary, A person is seeking help understanding a calculus quiz question involving graphing a piece-wise function and determining continuity at a point. They receive advice to not confuse the concepts of limits and function values, and to consider the given definitions and limits carefully before choosing an answer. After further discussion, it is concluded that the given options for the answer are not entirely accurate and that the person should trust their own understanding.
  • #1
brendan_foo
65
0
Hi there,

Only a slight problem here... My girlfriend has just taken a calc 1 quiz and she's presented this problem to me which goes against the grain of what I know - however, I could be hideously mis-informed.

She was asked to draw a graph of a piece-wise function given some definitions and limits. I shall only state the area that is causing me some intuitive grief.

[tex]
f(0) = 2
[/tex]
[tex]
\lim_{x\to{0^-}} f(x) = -1
[/tex]
[tex]
\lim_{x\to{0^+}} f(x) = 1
[/tex]

If f(0) is most definitely defined at that point, why is it not its limit. By this logic, couldn't i essentially dot defined, singular points all over any arbitrary graph with DEFINITE two sided limits...This is my problem...

Any opinions?

Cheers guys...Brendan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, as long as you don't confuse the concepts of limits and function values, this exercise cannot possibly represent any problems.
 
  • #3
This is what I argued, but wasn't received with much gratitude.

Thankyou for this...

Cheers...Brendan
 
  • #4
Okay, remember that in order for a one-sided limit to exist at some point, then the limiting function value of EACH SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS CONVERGING TO THAT POINT (from the one side) must equal the limiting function value associated with every other sequence.
 
  • #5
Quick other point:

It then asks...is the function left continuous, right continuous or continuous at the point x = 0. Based on the definition of continuity, that is,

[tex]
\lim_{x\to a}f(x) = f(a)
[/tex]

Based on the two stipulated limits (as is posted above), what could I say in this case, as the limits are defined as different to the stated existing point [itex]f(0) = 2[/itex].

Cheers...Brendan
 
Last edited:
  • #6
x=0 is a screaming discontinuity for this function
 
  • #7
Again, this is what I argued - however, as a multiple choice question as: left cont, right cont, or continuous in both senses...how is one to answer?! This is the point that I make.
 
  • #8
It is none of them. Just look at the definitions you have been given.
 
  • #9
I can 100% see this; but when faced with a) b) or c) and nothing in between, it seemed a little peculiar, especially with her screaming down my neck that it MUST be one of the three, even though it clearly isn't.

Thanks guys, just wanted to get some confirmation before I got on my high-horse.

Mucho-gracias!
 
  • #10
Well, as you actually PHRASED it (without the a), b) and c)), NEITHER is a perfectly acceptable answer!

If the book clearly has stated your three only options as the ones you mentioned, I suggest you make a cozy fire of it.
 
  • #11
I quote verbatim from the cherished one... It wasn't a book exercise, it was a quiz devised by some one.
 
  • #12
Yes, so as I said "NEITHER" is a perfectly acceptable answer.
 

FAQ: Slight Discrepancy in Piece-wise Function Graph

What is a slight discrepancy in a piece-wise function graph?

A slight discrepancy in a piece-wise function graph refers to a small difference or inconsistency between the actual plotted points and the mathematical function represented by the graph. This can occur due to rounding errors, limitations of the graphing software, or other factors.

How can a slight discrepancy affect the accuracy of the graph?

In most cases, a slight discrepancy in a piece-wise function graph does not significantly impact the overall accuracy of the graph. However, in some cases, it may make it difficult to accurately interpret the data and make precise conclusions. It is important to carefully analyze the data and consider any discrepancies before drawing conclusions from the graph.

Can a slight discrepancy be corrected?

In some cases, a slight discrepancy in a piece-wise function graph can be corrected by adjusting the graphing software settings or using more precise mathematical calculations. However, in other cases, the discrepancy may be due to inherent limitations of the data or mathematical function and cannot be corrected.

Are there any ways to prevent slight discrepancies in piece-wise function graphs?

While it is impossible to completely eliminate all discrepancies, there are steps that can be taken to minimize them. These include using more precise data, using more accurate mathematical calculations, and using high-quality graphing software with advanced settings.

How should a slight discrepancy be addressed when presenting the graph to others?

If a slight discrepancy is present in a piece-wise function graph, it is important to acknowledge it when presenting the graph to others. This can be done by mentioning it verbally or including a note on the graph itself. It is important to explain the discrepancy and how it may impact the interpretation of the graph.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
964
Back
Top