Slope and Deflection of a Simply Supported Beam

Click For Summary
To determine Young's Modulus (E) and the second moment of inertia (I) for a custom beam, one must consider the beam's cross-sectional geometry and material properties. The formula Ixx = bd^3/12 applies to solid rectangular sections, providing a method to calculate I based on the beam's width (b) and depth (d). Young's Modulus, E, is material-specific and typically found in reference tables for various materials, with 200 x 10^9 N/m² being a standard value for steel. For custom beams, if E and I are not provided, users can derive these values through measurements or by consulting established data sources. This approach allows for the calculation of deflection and slope in beam analysis, essential for structural engineering applications.
MathsRetard09
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
The title is fairly misleading but is within the subject.

I have drawn up a beam of my own as part of my classwork because what bothers me is how you would find Young's Modulus [E] and the second moment of inertia without being given them.

Every question I have looked at has given me the two values combined hence, EI.

The beam I have drawn is 10m long. From the LHE going right, 2m in is a 90kN point load, 3.5m in from LHE is a 8kN point load, from 2m in from LHE across by 3m is a UDL 12kN/m, and 7.5m in from LHE is a final point load of 10kN.

RL = 103,1kN and RR = 40.9kN

In order for me to find ymax at the mid-point of the beam I require an EI value which because it's a beam I made myself, I do not have.

What I have available that I think was relevant:

a sheet that shows me data for different types of beams, with D x B, Ixx and Zxx values.
The bending equation: E/R=sigma/y=M/I
Ixx=bd^3/12

I had a go at this over 6 weeks ago and I got my E and I values, however I've lost the notes that have the calculations on them.

The values I got were, E = 200x10^9N/m and I = 2.9...x10^-3cm^4


All I am asking here for is the route / method taken to find the E and I - not EI, but the two individual values for the beam described above.

I would use symbols to draw the beam here but it would look a mess, but then again:



RL = 103.1kN |_2m_| 90kN_1.5m_| 8kN_3m_| 12kN/m[UDL] _2.5m_| 10kN_2.5m_| RR = 40.9kN

|____|[][][]|[][][]______|______| (Looks similar to this)


So if you know how to do all this just imagine your given this beam mainly to find the slope and deflection - which I know how to do.

Unfortunately you need an EI value, to find that you need both E and I.

If you know the method please share it here because my mind is blank haha.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MathsRetard09 said:
I have drawn up a beam of my own as part of my classwork because what bothers me is how you would find Young's Modulus [E] and the second moment of inertia without being given them.
...
Ixx=bd^3/12
...
The values I got were, E = 200x10^9N/m and I = 2.9...x10^-3cm^4


This is posted is in the wrong section, but anyway...

I depends on the geometry of the beam's cross section. Ixx=bd^3/12 is correct for a solid rectangular section.

E depends on the material. Basically you have to measure it, but the values for many materials have already been measured and tabulated. 200x10^9N/m^2 (note, m^2 not m) is a reasonable value for steel.

Google will find you tables of formulas for I for different shaped beams, and values of E for different materials.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K