- #36
StatGuy2000
Education Advisor
- 2,051
- 1,147
Based on the news link provided by the OP, the program that is about to be implemented by Finnish government sounds similar to the Mincome program that was set up by the province of Manitoba in Canada back in the 1970s. The details of the program can be found in the following Wikipedia article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mincome
The Wikipedia article also summarizes some of the research of the post-Mincome data. The summary is that the labour supply responses were generally small, with working hours dropping about 1% for men, 3% for married women, and 5% for unmarried women, with only working mothers and teenagers working substantially less. Some of the results of further analysis by University of Manitoba Evelyn Forget found that the period that Mincome was administered, hospital visits dropped 8.5% (with fewer instances of workplace injuries and fewer ER visits from injuries and accidents), reduction of psychiatric hospitalization and the number of mental health-related consultations (see links in the Wikipedia article).
My personal take is that, at least initially, there seems to be benefits to having a guaranteed universal basic income to mitigate the effects of poverty (with the emphasis to the word "seems"). However, given the relatively short duration of the program of Mincome, and the fact that the program was implemented in a relatively rural area of Canada, it is difficult to make any real conclusions on the effectiveness of such programs.
I would be interested to see what both the short-term and long-term impacts of the program being implemented in Finland over the coming years -- could be fertile grounds for research by economists, sociologists, and others.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mincome
The Wikipedia article also summarizes some of the research of the post-Mincome data. The summary is that the labour supply responses were generally small, with working hours dropping about 1% for men, 3% for married women, and 5% for unmarried women, with only working mothers and teenagers working substantially less. Some of the results of further analysis by University of Manitoba Evelyn Forget found that the period that Mincome was administered, hospital visits dropped 8.5% (with fewer instances of workplace injuries and fewer ER visits from injuries and accidents), reduction of psychiatric hospitalization and the number of mental health-related consultations (see links in the Wikipedia article).
My personal take is that, at least initially, there seems to be benefits to having a guaranteed universal basic income to mitigate the effects of poverty (with the emphasis to the word "seems"). However, given the relatively short duration of the program of Mincome, and the fact that the program was implemented in a relatively rural area of Canada, it is difficult to make any real conclusions on the effectiveness of such programs.
I would be interested to see what both the short-term and long-term impacts of the program being implemented in Finland over the coming years -- could be fertile grounds for research by economists, sociologists, and others.