Sobolev class of loops to a compact lie Group

In summary, the paper discusses the convexity of the image of moment maps for loop groups, specifically for compact Lie groups and the circle. The loops group is defined as the set of functions from the circle to the group of Sobolev class H1. This means that the function and its first derivative are both square integrable. The question is, what does this mean for functions with codomain a compact Lie group? The Haar integral can be used to talk about square integrability for real-valued functions, but for functions whose image lies in a group, a norm must be chosen. The derivative is a weak derivative, but according to the Sobolev embedding theorem, H1 functions on R are Holder continuous. Therefore, continuous
  • #1
Kreizhn
743
1
I am currently reading a paper discussing the convexity of the image of moment maps for loop groups. In particular, if G is a compact Lie group and [itex] S^1 [/itex] is the circle, the paper defines the loops group to be the set of function [itex] f: S^1 \to G [/itex] of "Sobolev class [itex] H^1 [/itex]." Now in the traditional sense, being of Sobolev class [itex] H^1 [/itex] means that the function and its first derivative are both square integrable. The question is, what does this mean for functions with codomain a compact Lie group?

So for real-valued functions whose domain is a compact Lie group, we could use the Haar integral to talk about square integrability. In this case, [itex] S^1 [/itex] conveniently just happens to be a compact, connected, abelian Lie group, though I'm sure we could even avoid the Haar measure by identifying [itex] S^1 [/itex] with the appropriate circles in R or C. But if the image of the function lies in a group, what do we do then? I suppose that we could use Whitney embedding to embed [itex] G \subseteq \mathbb R^n [/itex], or Peter-Weyl to embed [itex] G \subseteq U(n) [/itex], but then I would need to choose a norm on these spaces.

Even if that is the correct procedure, the better question is "what functions then are not in this space?" Since G is compact, composition with any norm would ensure that continuous functions are bounded. But we also have that the derivative exists, implying that all such functions would be continuous by necessity (or are we imposing weak-derivative conditions on this space)? That is, would it not then be sufficient to restrict ourselves to continuous functions?

Any insight would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, presumably you have an inner product on G. Of course f(t) is automatically bounded, but f'(t) need not be (its image is in the Lie algebra), so having an L2 derivative is a restriction on the function.

Yes, the derivative is a weak derivative, but according to the Sobolev embedding theorem, an H1 function on R is Holder continuous with constant 1/2. So you still get something better than continuity. In that sense, you could not restrict yourself to continuous functions because they are a larger class of functions.
 
  • #3
Hey Vargo, thanks for the reply.

I was actually able to deduce what was meant by Sobolev in the first part of my post. It simply means that in any coordinate chart [itex] \Phi: G \to \mathbb R^n [/itex] the function [itex] f : S^1 \to G [/itex] is Sobolev if [itex] \Phi \circ f [/itex] is Sobolev H1 under the Euclidean norm in [itex] \mathbb R^n [/itex].

On a related note, I was thinking about trying to put a norm on G as follows: I can fix a G-invariant metric on G (G acting on itself) and hence get an induced complete metric on G by Hopf-Rinow. Since I believe one of the typical obstructions for that metric to be a norm is the choice of a suitable base point, we are in luck since G has an obvious natural basepoint, the identity. However, I never got around to actually testing this out since I discovered the "true" definition of Sobolev class on the way.

I believe that f'(t) should also be automatically bounded, unless I'm just crazy. Perhaps I mis-stated the question? Anyway, here is my rationale. For our purposes, we are identifying [itex] S^1 [/itex] with either [itex] \mathbb R/2\pi\mathbb Z [/itex] or as the unit circle in [itex] \mathbb C[/itex]. In either case, the derivative of a function [itex] f: S^1 \to G [/itex] is the map [itex] f': S^1 \to TG [/itex] (we are thinking of this as a path, not a formal map of manifolds, so this is not the pushforward!). The fact the image lies in (what may be identified with) [itex] \mathfrak g [/itex] should not matter, as the domain is still compact. This would imply that derivative is also bounded, no?
 
  • #4
Right, the local coordinates determine the sobolev functions. I forgot that part.

You are saying that f' is like a loop in R^n and therefore closed. But if f' is not necessarily continuous how would you deduce that? Aren't you using the fact that the image of a compact set by a continuous map is compact? f' need not be continuous.

[itex]g(x)=\int_0^x (2/3)1/t^{1/3}\, dt = x^{2/3},\,\,\, 0\leq x\leq 1 [/itex].

Extend g periodically.

[itex] f(x)=e^{2\pi ig(x)} [/itex].

f maps S1 into S1. f'(x) is an L2 function which is not continuous and not bounded for x near 0.
 
  • #5


I can provide some clarification and additional information on the topic of Sobolev class of loops to a compact Lie group.

Firstly, the concept of Sobolev class H^1 for functions with codomain a compact Lie group is well-defined and has been extensively studied in the field of functional analysis. In this context, the square integrability of the function and its first derivative is still a valid condition, but it is defined with respect to a suitable measure on the compact Lie group. This measure is typically chosen to be the Haar measure, which is a normalized invariant measure on the group. This means that the measure is invariant under translations and rotations, making it a natural choice for studying functions on a compact Lie group.

Additionally, the concept of Sobolev class H^1 on a compact Lie group can also be defined using the theory of representation spaces. This approach is based on embedding the compact Lie group into a larger space, such as a Euclidean space or a unitary group, as mentioned in the content. The choice of norm on these spaces is not arbitrary, but rather is determined by the structure of the compact Lie group and its corresponding representation spaces.

In terms of functions that are not in this space, it is important to note that not all continuous functions on a compact Lie group are in the Sobolev class H^1. This is because the condition of square integrability of the function and its first derivative is more restrictive than just continuity. In fact, the Sobolev class H^1 consists of functions that have certain regularity properties, making them suitable for various applications in mathematical analysis and physics.

Overall, the concept of Sobolev class of loops to a compact Lie group is a well-defined and important topic in mathematics and physics. It provides a powerful framework for studying functions on compact Lie groups and has numerous applications in various fields. I hope this provides some insight and clarification on the topic.
 

FAQ: Sobolev class of loops to a compact lie Group

What is the Sobolev class of loops to a compact lie group?

The Sobolev class of loops to a compact Lie group is a mathematical framework used to study the regularity of smooth curves on a compact Lie group. It is a generalization of the Sobolev spaces on Euclidean spaces, which are used to measure the smoothness of functions.

What is the significance of studying this class of loops?

Studying the Sobolev class of loops to a compact Lie group allows us to understand the regularity of curves on a more complex space than Euclidean space. This is relevant in many areas of mathematics and physics, such as differential geometry, harmonic analysis, and quantum mechanics.

How is the Sobolev class of loops defined?

The Sobolev class of loops to a compact Lie group is typically defined as a space of curves that possess certain smoothness and regularity properties. These properties are related to the derivatives of the curve and can be measured using the Sobolev norm.

What are some applications of the Sobolev class of loops?

The Sobolev class of loops has various applications in mathematics and physics. In differential geometry, it is used to study the regularity of geodesics on a compact Lie group. In harmonic analysis, it is used to understand the smoothness of functions on a compact Lie group. In quantum mechanics, it is applied to study the behavior of particles on a curved space.

Are there any open problems or ongoing research related to this class of loops?

Yes, there are still many open problems and ongoing research related to the Sobolev class of loops to a compact Lie group. Some current research focuses on finding optimal regularity conditions for curves on a compact Lie group and studying the behavior of geodesics on non-compact Lie groups. Other areas of interest include applications to mathematical physics and the development of new techniques for studying the regularity of curves on non-Euclidean spaces.

Similar threads

Back
Top