Solid mechanics challenge question

In summary: You are correct in that the following matrix is necessary in order to move the axis e2,e3:A=\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \\0 & -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \end{pmatrix}
  • #36
sorry i don't understand..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
At the top of the cylinder, the radial direction is also the [itex]\bold{e_2}[/itex] direction. At the side of the cylinder, the radial direction is also the [itex]\bold{e_1}[/itex] direction. So you have to commit to a single point before you begin to do the stress transformation part of the problem; otherwise, the axes will be coupled in an ambiguous way. I'm suggesting you pick a point at the weld and on the side of the cylinder closest to the viewer. Does this help clarify?
 
  • #38
alexferdin said:
so on any point on the e1e2 plane the stress is [tex]\sigma[/tex]rr and [tex]\sigma[/tex]11=[tex]\sigma[/tex]22=[tex]\sigma[/tex]rr?

No, I wouldn't say that. Rather, we have [itex]\sigma_{11}=\sigma_\mathrm{rr}\cos^2\theta+\sigma_{\theta\theta}\sin^2\theta[/itex] within the tank material, where [itex]\theta[/itex] is measured from [itex]\bold{e_1}[/itex].
 
  • #39
will be edited later *
 
Last edited:
  • #40
I'm going to start from the beginning now the make sure its all allright

1. finding the constants:
[tex]\sigma_{rr}(r=R)=a+b=-10P[/tex], [tex]\sigma_{rr}(r=2R)=4a+b=-4P[/tex]
we comapre these exprassions to [tex]\ -10P,-P[/tex] and not to [tex]\+10P,-P[/tex] because the sign (-) says that the tank is under compression from the inner and outer surface?
This gives us a=2P, b=-12P

2.a The stress tensor in cylindrical coordinates [tex](r,\theta,z)[/tex]:
[tex]\sigma_{(r,\theta,z)}=\begin{pmatrix}
2P-\frac{12P}{(r/R)^{2}} & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 2P+\frac{12P}{(r/R)^{2}} & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 2P \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

2.b Switching from cylindrical coordinates [tex](r,\theta,z)[/tex] to cartesian [tex](x,y,z)[/tex], z remains the same:

R - transform matrix from cylinder to cartesian

[tex]\sigma_{(x,y,z)}=R^{T}\cdot \sigma_{(r,\theta,z)}\cdot R[/tex],
[tex]R=\begin{pmatrix}cos(\theta) & -sin(\theta) & 0 \\ sin(\theta) & cos(\theta) & 0 \\ 0 & 0 &1\end{pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]\sigma_{(x,y,z)}=\begin{pmatrix}\sigma_{xx} & \sigma_{xy} & \sigma_{xz} \\ \sigma_{yx} & \sigma_{yy} & \sigma_{yz} \\ \sigma_{zx} & \sigma_{zy} & \sigma_{zz}\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}cos(\theta) & sin(\theta) & 0 \\ -sin(\theta) & cos(\theta) & 0 \\ 0 & 0 &1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\sigma_{rr} & \sigma_{r\theta} & \sigma_{rz} \\ \sigma_{\theta r} & \sigma_{\theta\theta} & \sigma_{\theta z} \\ \sigma_{zr} & \sigma_{z\theta} & \sigma_{zz}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}cos(\theta) & -sin(\theta) & 0 \\ sin(\theta) & cos(\theta) & 0 \\ 0 & 0 &1\end{pmatrix}=[/tex]
[tex]=\begin{pmatrix}cos(\theta) & sin(\theta) & 0 \\ -sin(\theta) & cos(\theta) & 0 \\ 0 & 0 &1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}2P-\frac{12P}{(r/R)^{2}} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 2P+\frac{12P}{(r/R)^{2}} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 2P \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}cos(\theta) & -sin(\theta) & 0 \\ sin(\theta) & cos(\theta) & 0 \\ 0 & 0 &1\end{pmatrix}[/tex]

2.c Transforming the cartesian coordinate system by 30 degrees - [tex]\sigma'[/tex]:

A - transformation matrix in the cartesian coordinate system by 30degrees

[tex]\sigma'_{(x,y,z)}=A^{T}\cdot \sigma_{(x,y,z)}\cdot A=A^{T}R^{T}\sigma_{(r,\theta,z)}RA[/tex],
[tex]A=\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & cos(60) & sin(60) \\0 & -sin(60) & cos(60) \end{pmatrix} [/tex]

The stress wall on AB is then:
[tex] \sigma'_{(x,y,z)}= \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & cos(60) & -sin(60) \\
0 & sin(60) & cos(60) \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}cos(\theta) & sin(\theta) & 0 \\ -sin(\theta) & cos(\theta) & 0 \\ 0 & 0 &1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}2P-\frac{12P}{(r/R)^{2}} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 2P+\frac{12P}{(r/R)^{2}} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 2P \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}cos(\theta) & -sin(\theta) & 0 \\ sin(\theta) & cos(\theta) & 0 \\ 0 & 0 &1\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & cos(60) & sin(60) \\
0 & -sin(60) & cos(60) \end{pmatrix} [/tex]

I'm waiting with the multiplication to see if you think I wrote it correctly this far, if so I can find the shear stress on AB by using the following connection:
[tex] \sigma_{ns}=s_i \cdot \sigma_{ij} \cdot n_i [/tex] when [tex] \hat{s} [/tex] and [tex]\hat{n}[/tex] are unit vectors pointing in the direction of the shear and normal stress.
 
Last edited:
  • #41
Mapes can you please evaluate my work?
I'm guessing I complicated things but its because I just don't understand the clues you gave me. I am stuck in the same place for almost a week and I'm just about the quit the all thing..
All I want is to understand in the clearest way how to change to cartesian coordinates and if after that change I am still suppose to have components in my tensor that depend on r or theta ?
 
  • #42
This approach looks fine.
 
  • #43
so can you explain how come the shear stress expression has theta in it? i mean, am i suppose to leave it like that?
and, based on your intuition, where would the failure first occure? (based on that ill try to prove it using the stress expression)
 
Last edited:
  • #44
the stress turns out to be an insanely huge matrix because of theta from the R transformation matrix. am i really suppose to leave it like that?
 
  • #45
You'll want to work at [itex]\theta=\pi[/itex] so the outer stress transformation rotates around the correct axis. That should simplify things. And don't you want [itex]30^\circ[/itex] instead of [itex]60^\circ[/itex]?

EDIT: Corrected [itex]\theta[/itex] typo.
 
Last edited:
  • #46
can you expand more on the theat=pi/2 ? i catually tried working with pi/4 because i figured that way i my matrix components are maximal
what does it mean outer stress transformation rotates around the correct axis? and is it correct that the failure will start at the middle of AB?

i know you are probably sick of me by now but the submition is tommorow morning :)
 
  • #47
Whoops, I meant to say [itex]\theta=\pi[/itex] (corrected above). As we discussed earlier, if you're going to rotate around [itex]\bold{e_1}[/itex] to determine the shear stress at the weld, then [itex]\bold{e_1}[/itex] needs to coincide with [itex]\sigma_\mathrm{rr}[/itex]. This only occurs in the above equations if [itex]\theta=\pi[/itex] or [itex]0[/itex].
 
  • #48
well that makes things a lot simpler :) now all i have to do is put it inside the multiplication above and look at the components A1,2
though its weird that the transformaition matrix from cylindrical to cartesian base turns into I, meaning does nothing to it..

and about where it first fails, middle of AB right?
 
Last edited:
  • #49
dislect said:
and about where it first fails, middle of AB right?

I believe that question is asking where in the wall the weld first yields: inside, middle, outside, etc. You'll get this from the transformed shear stress.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top