Solution to Sum of Exponential Squared Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter m00se
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a solution for the series \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \left(\frac{x^n}{n!}\right)^2\). It is noted that the solution involves the Bessel function, specifically expressed as \(\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{x^{2k}}{k!(k+n)!}=x^{-n}I_n(2x)\). Participants reference the Modified Bessel Function of the First Kind for further understanding. The conversation highlights the complexity of the series and the need for advanced mathematical concepts to solve it. This topic emphasizes the intersection of exponential functions and special functions in mathematical series.
m00se
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I know:

\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{x^n}{n!}=e^x

However, is there a similar solution for:

\sum_{n=0}^\infty \left(\frac{x^n}{n!}\right)^2Thanks in advance; I'm not very good at this kind of maths (I teach statistics :devil:), and I've been struggling with this one for a while.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top