MHB Solution to the Riemann Hypothesis in plain English

AI Thread Summary
The discussion presents a theory linking prime numbers to a "concurrent incentive field" that shapes the number line at x=1/2. It posits that each prime number serves as a turning point in an n-dimensional imaginary number line, influenced by chaos theory and the distribution of non-prime numbers. The theory suggests that prime numbers are not merely endpoints but originate from a larger chaotic attractor in number field space. The shape of this attractor is associated with Riemann symmetry, with prime numbers acting like tidal points influenced by preceding non-prime numbers. Ultimately, the thread was closed due to concerns about the validity of the mathematical claims presented.
Zebobez
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The number line at x=1/2 is mediated by a concurrent incentive field whose shape can be extrapolated through the placement of prime numbers. Each prime number is a turning point in the n-dimensional movement of the imaginary number line, whose degree and angle can be determined through all the prime numbers before it and the non-prime factors within it. Foe example, the prime number 7 is a 1-3-5 degree turn around the attractor shape. Chaos theory mediates the actual form of the shape, which is defined by a single seed that can be extrapolated through a reduction of the attractor vortex.

Prime numbers, therefore, are mediated upon by implicative stressors that originate from the chaotic vortex whose shape can be found through the distribution of prime numbers. In essence, prime numbers are not the end of a chain; rather, they are a originative effect of a large-scale n-dimensional attractor in number field space. View attachment 7662

- - - Updated - - -

For clarification, the attractor's shape is defined by the Riemann symmetry, in the same way that all chaotic attractors are symmetrical. Each prime number emerges from the interactions between the non-prime numbers before it and their less-than-one unit strength (which is defined as how attracted to the attractor they are.) Sort of like how the moon causes tides to rise and fall. Prime numbers are the highest and the lowest tide points.
 

Attachments

  • attractor.png
    attractor.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 169
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The symmetry may be just something I threw in because I didn't understand it, it may or may not actually have a bearing on the attractor's form.
 
Hi Zebobez and welcome to MHB!

What is a "concurrent incentive field"?
 
Zebobez said:
The number line at x=1/2 is mediated by a concurrent incentive field whose shape can be extrapolated through the placement of prime numbers. Each prime number is a turning point in the n-dimensional movement of the imaginary number line, whose degree and angle can be determined through all the prime numbers before it and the non-prime factors within it. Foe example, the prime number 7 is a 1-3-5 degree turn around the attractor shape. Chaos theory mediates the actual form of the shape, which is defined by a single seed that can be extrapolated through a reduction of the attractor vortex.

Prime numbers, therefore, are mediated upon by implicative stressors that originate from the chaotic vortex whose shape can be found through the distribution of prime numbers. In essence, prime numbers are not the end of a chain; rather, they are a originative effect of a large-scale n-dimensional attractor in number field space.

- - - Updated - - -

For clarification, the attractor's shape is defined by the Riemann symmetry, in the same way that all chaotic attractors are symmetrical. Each prime number emerges from the interactions between the non-prime numbers before it and their less-than-one unit strength (which is defined as how attracted to the attractor they are.) Sort of like how the moon causes tides to rise and fall. Prime numbers are the highest and the lowest tide points.
Absolutely wonderful! Hilarious!
(I can see why you wouldn't want to wait for April 1.)
 
Basically, the convex point of this chaotic attractor is the explanation for why prime numbers behave the way that they do. Each prime number, and its subsets of numbers, curve the number line in n-dimensional space, and the shape they imply has a midpoint that can be described using linear coordinates, with each axis bearing a fundamental value related to the sequence of prime numbers.
 
This is crank mathematics and moderator input is being ignored. Thread closed.

If anyone disagrees with this decision please PM a site administrator.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
5K
2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top