Solve 5^x=2x+1 or Prove Impossibility

  • Thread starter Thread starter Little ant
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 5^x = 2x + 1 can be approached by examining the function y = (5^x) - (2x + 1), which indicates the presence of two roots, one of which is x = 0. Graphing this function helps approximate the second root, which can then be refined using numerical methods like Newton-Raphson. Analytical solutions are not feasible with ordinary methods and require the Lambert W function for resolution. The discussion emphasizes the importance of numerical computation for finding accurate solutions. Ultimately, while one solution is easily identified, the existence of a second solution necessitates advanced techniques.
Little ant
21
0
Find the solutions of 5^x=2x+1 by ordinary methods? if it can´t be found by these ways, then prove that it's imposible.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It depends on what you mean by ordinary methods.

By inspection, x=0.
 
but, there is other answer, how you find it?
 
The exponent ^5 is behind the X or after?
 
Ordinary method consists in studying the function y=(5^x)-(2x+1)
This shows that two roots exist (one of them is obvious).
Drawing the graph of the function allows to obtain a first approximate of the second root.
Then, numerical computation leads to the value of the root, as accurate as we want. There are a lot of numerical methods : Newton-Raphson and many other...
Analytical solving is outside the scope of ordinary methods. It requires the use of a special function : the Lambert W function.
 

Attachments

  • Graph.JPG
    Graph.JPG
    41.9 KB · Views: 414
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top