Solve ∫cos^-x/e^x^x? - Get Help Here

  • Thread starter Superposed_Cat
  • Start date
In summary, there is no well-formed formula that can be expressed in terms of the elementary functions.
  • #1
Superposed_Cat
388
5
∫cos^-x/e^x^x? can this be done? A thanks to anyone who can do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What you posted makes *no* sense. It's a poorly formed formula. So of course it can't be done.
 
  • #3
What you wrote doesn't make sense. Cosine to the power of what? I'm assuming the variable of integration is x? What does e^x^x mean: ##{e^x}^x## or ##(e^x)^x##?
And what does "can this be done" mean? Are you asking if it's integrable? Are you asking if it has an elementary derivative?
 
  • #4
x is variable of integration. its cos to the power of -x. and to pwsnafu. the former.

sorry

pwsnafu said:
And what does "can this be done" mean? Are you asking if it's integrable? Are you asking if it has an elementary derivative?
yes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Cosine of what to the power of -x, Superposed_Cat?Suppose you do come up with a well-formed formula that bears some resemblance to what you wrote in the original post. Given the mess in the OP, it's almost assured not going to be integrable in terms of the elementary functions.

Example: What is ∫e-x-2dx ? What about ∫sin(t)/t dt? These are of a much simpler form than what you wrote, and yet one cannot express these indefinite integrals as a closed form expression in the elementary functions.
 
  • #6
oh damn! I am forgetting so many things deepest apologies:redface:
 

Attachments

  • delete.png
    delete.png
    869 bytes · Views: 382
  • #7
Who cares?
It is a continuous function, and therefore integrable (wherever the numerator is well defined).
It does not have an antiderivative expressible in elementary functions, but over any finite interval, the value of the integral can readily be calculated by numerical means.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #8
Damn, I hoping there was an antiderivative.
 
  • #9
Superposed_Cat said:
Damn, I hoping there was an antiderivative.
It sure exists an antiderivative. It's just that is impossible to find a neat formula for it.
 
  • #10
arildno said:
It sure exists an antiderivative. It's just that is impossible to find a neat formula for it.

It all depends on what the OP is happy with, of course. Maybe he's happy by just being able to find the graph and a numerical way of computing things. After all, we don't really know more than that about logarithms or sines and cosines either. But still we interpret those functions as well-known.

On the other hand, if you want to express it as known elementary functions, then such a thing is probably impossible. But an antiderivative is certainly there.

So, it is up to the OP to clarify what he means with "finding" the integral.
 
  • #11
Superposed_Cat said:
Damn, I hoping there was an antiderivative.

If f(x) is an integrable function, then ##g(x) = \int_{a}^{x} f(t) \, dt## is an antiderivative. This is why I asked what you mean by "can be done".
 
  • #12
pwsnafu said:
If f(x) is an integrable function, then ##g(x) = \int_{a}^{x} f(t) \, dt## is an antiderivative. This is why I asked what you mean by "can be done".
I strenuously oppose that that is a NEAT formula.
It is a voracious dragon in a mouse's clothing.
:smile:
 
  • #13
Superposed_Cat said:
Damn, I hoping there was an antiderivative.
Of course there's an antiderivative. The problem is that you can't express it in terms of a finite number of operations using only the elementary functions. You can express it, for example, as some kind of infinite series. Good luck developing that, though.

Another issue: that your function involves xx (exx) and cos-x(x) means there's a branch point at x=0. This is going to make the series have a finite radius of convergence. But an antiderivative certainly does exist.
 
  • #14
Superposed_Cat said:
Damn, I hoping there was an antiderivative.

Translation:Damn, I was hoping that there was an antiderivative that could be found non-numerically in less than an hour.
 
  • #15
The answer then is no.

Why would you think anything there is?
 
  • #16
Superposed_Cat said:
Translation:Damn, I was hoping that there was an antiderivative that could be found non-numerically in less than an hour.
The answer to that would be "no" for almost every integrable function.
 
  • #17
As HallsofIvy implies, what you learn in your studies amounts to practically..Nothing.
:smile:
 

FAQ: Solve ∫cos^-x/e^x^x? - Get Help Here

What is the equation ∫cos^-x/e^x^x?

The equation ∫cos^-x/e^x^x represents the indefinite integral of cosine to the negative x power divided by e to the x squared power.

What does it mean to "solve" an integral?

Solving an integral involves finding the function that, when differentiated, gives the original function. In other words, it is the reverse process of differentiation.

Why is it important to include the "∫" symbol in the equation?

The symbol "∫" represents the integral sign, which is essential in indicating that the equation is an integral and not a regular function. It also helps to distinguish between definite and indefinite integrals.

What is the significance of the negative exponent in the cosine term?

The negative exponent signifies that the cosine term is in the denominator, which means it is being divided rather than multiplied. In this equation, it represents a fraction with the exponent being the denominator.

How can I get help with solving this equation?

You can seek help from a math tutor, consult online resources, or use a calculator or software specifically designed for solving integrals. You can also ask for assistance from your professor, classmates, or other experts in the field.

Back
Top