Solve Equation Problem: 2a^(3/2) + (a^2-x^2)^(1/2)

  • Thread starter 1/2"
  • Start date
Does that help? :smile:In summary, the conversation is discussing a worked out example involving solving equations. The person is confused about the disappearance of a term in the equation and asks for clarification. The expert suggests that the term may be a misprint and suggests correcting it to a different value.
  • #1
1/2"
99
0
Hey there!
I have a few doubts regarding this worked out example in my book,
It goes like this…
Solve 2a ^ (3/2) +(a^2-x^2) ^ (1/2) {(a+x) ^ (1/2) +(a-x) ^ (1/2) }= a^ (2/3) +a{(a+x) ^(1/2)+(a-x) ^1/2}+(a^2-x^2) ^ (1/2)
Well now they say
Hence, removing from a^ ( 3/2) both sides and transposing, we get
a^ (1/2) {a-(a^2-x^2) ^ (1/2) }= {(a+x) ^ (1/2) + (a-x ) ^ (1/2) }x { a-(a^ 2 -x^2) ^ (1/2) }
whence a^ (1/2) = ( a+x) ^ (1/2) +(a-x) ^ (1/2) ;
squaring both sides a= 2a =2( a^2-x^2) ^ (1/2)
anyway it concludes as x= ± ( a√ 3)/2
But the problem is that I can’t understand how could 2a^2/3 suddenly disappear!
Plz help me!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hey 1/2"! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
1/2" said:
… But the problem is that I can’t understand how could 2a^2/3 suddenly disappear!

It's very difficult to read your equations, but I think the answer is that 2a2/3 hasn't disappeared …

a2/3 has disappeared from both sides, which is ok because you can always add or subtract the same amount from both sides (or indeed multiply or divide both sides by the same amount, or raise them to the same power)
 
  • #3
i am sorry for the mistakes !:-p
I have corrected them . For futher mistake please let post it!:approve:
 
  • #4
Hi 1/2"! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

First, you don't need ^ if you're using SUP (maybe in handwriting, where different levels aren't clear, but certainly not in typing), and you don't need brackets round (1/2) etc.

Quicker if I do that now …
1/2" said:
Hey there!
I have a few doubts regarding this worked out example in my book,
It goes like this…
Solve 2a3/2 +(a2-x2)1/2 {(a+x)1/2 +(a-x)1/2 }= a2/3 +a{(a+x)1/2+(a-x)1/2}+(a2-x2)1/2
Well now they say
Hence, removing from a2/3 both sides and transposing, we get
a1/2 {a-(a2-x2)1/2 }= {(a+x)1/2 + (a-x )1/2 }x { a-(a2 -x2)1/2 }
whence a1/2 = ( a+x)1/2 +(a-x)1/2 ;
squaring both sides a= 2a =2( a2-x2)1/2
anyway it concludes as x= ± ( a√ 3)/2
But the problem is that I can’t understand how could 2a2/3 suddenly disappear!
Plz help me!

ok, now I think I can see :wink: what's happened …

either you or your book are misprinting "2/3" for "3/2" :rolleyes:

the a1/2 {a that begins the second equation-line is the same as a3/2, which is presumably what it should be throughout.

Does that sort it out? :smile:
 
  • #5
I'm sorry i don't get it.
 
  • #6
1/2" said:
… Solve 2a ^ (3/2) +(a^2-x^2) ^ (1/2) {(a+x) ^ (1/2) +(a-x) ^ (1/2) }= a^ (2/3) +a{(a+x) ^(1/2)+(a-x) ^1/2}+(a^2-x^2) ^ (1/2)
Well now they say
Hence, removing from a^ ( 3/2) both sides and transposing …

But the problem is that I can’t understand how could 2a^2/3 suddenly disappear!
1/2" said:
I'm sorry i don't get it.

Well, the a2/3 just after the = sign doesn't seem to match anything else in that equation, so I think it's a misprint for a3/2
 

FAQ: Solve Equation Problem: 2a^(3/2) + (a^2-x^2)^(1/2)

What is the equation being solved?

The equation being solved is 2a^(3/2) + (a^2-x^2)^(1/2).

What are the variables in this equation?

The variables in this equation are a and x.

How do you solve this equation?

To solve this equation, you can first simplify it by rewriting (a^2-x^2)^(1/2) as (a-x)(a+x). Then, you can combine like terms and isolate the variable on one side. Finally, you can use algebraic methods such as factoring or the quadratic formula to solve for the variable.

What are the possible solutions for this equation?

The possible solutions for this equation will depend on the specific values of a and x. In general, there may be zero, one, or two solutions.

Can this equation be solved algebraically?

Yes, this equation can be solved algebraically as long as the variables are real numbers and the equation is not a higher order polynomial with no real solutions.

Back
Top