Solve for Equivalent Resistance - Resistor is shorted?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating equivalent resistance in a circuit where a 75-ohm resistor is shorted. The key point is that the 75-ohm resistor is effectively a short circuit because it is in parallel with a zero-resistance wire, resulting in no current flowing through it. The correct calculation for the equivalent resistance is (3 || 30) || 7.5, which simplifies to 2 ohms. The user initially attempted a different approach without redrawing the circuit but still arrived at the same result, confirming the validity of their method. Understanding the impact of short circuits is crucial for accurately solving such problems.
zr95
Messages
25
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I'm studying for a test and since this is technically a textbook problem I figured I'd post here to prevent being flagged.
upload_2016-9-25_14-6-36.png

I have the circuit redrawn.
upload_2016-9-25_14-3-32.png


Homework Equations


Series: Req = R1+R2...
Parallel: 1/Req= 1/R1 + 1/R2...

The Attempt at a Solution


I want to understand why when solving this circuit for Req it is (3 || 30) || 7.5 = 2ohms.
According to the solution I'm looking at the 75 ohm resistor is considered a short and no current flows across this? I don't understand why this is the case.

Also I was originally trying to be lazy and solve and just add things up without redrawing the circuit and ended up with 2ohms by doing:
((5||20)+2)||3 = 2ohms
Was this just coincidence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zr95 said:
I want to understand why when solving this circuit for Req it is (3 || 30) || 7.5 = 2ohms.
According to the solution I'm looking at the 75 ohm resistor is considered a short and no current flows across this? I don't understand why this is the case.
That is because the 75 ohm "resistor" is connected in parallel with a zero resistance piece of wire.

zr95 said:
Also I was originally trying to be lazy and solve and just add things up without redrawing the circuit and ended up with 2ohms by doing:
((5||20)+2)||3 = 2ohms
Was this just coincidence?
Nope, its not a coincidence - if you deform the circuit, your consideration is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes zr95
You da man. That makes a lot of sense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K