- #1
quasar_4
- 290
- 0
Homework Statement
I'm working my way through Wald's GR book and doing this geodesic problem:
Show that any curve whose tangent satisfies [itex] u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = k u^\beta [/itex], where k is a constant, can be reparameterized so that [itex] \tilde{u}^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta = 0 [/itex].
Homework Equations
Geodesic equation
The Attempt at a Solution
If we assume that the curve was originally parameterized so that [itex] u = d/d\lambda [/itex] and we reparameterize so that [itex] \tilde{u} = d/dt [/itex] with [itex]t = t(\lambda) [/itex] then it follows immediately that [itex] u^\alpha = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\alpha [/itex].
So then [itex] u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\beta \right) [/itex]. Now I know I need to expand this out into two terms, and I was thinking I could use the product rule to do that, but I'm a bit confused about how to do that. It seems I'd get
[itex] u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha u^\beta = u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\beta \right) = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}u^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta + u^\alpha \tilde{u^\beta} \nabla_\alpha \frac{dt}{d\lambda} [/itex]
The first term I can relate to my definition [itex] u^\alpha = \frac{dt}{d\lambda}\tilde{u}^\alpha [/itex] to get [itex] \left(\frac{dt}{d\lambda}\right)^2 \tilde{u}^\alpha \nabla_\alpha \tilde{u}^\beta [/itex], and I know I'm supposed to relate this and the other term to the other side of the geodesic equation (with the constant k) to get a differential equation to solve for t(lambda). But I'm confused about how to get there from here, mostly from term [itex] \nabla_\alpha \frac{dt}{d\lambda} [/itex]. I don't understand what it means mathematically (isn't dt/dlambda a scalar?), let alone how to do anything with it. Can anyone explain how to take the next step? Or was my "product rule" guess total nonsense?