Solve Matrix without Calculator: Find Values of X

  • Thread starter Thread starter jjuugg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
AI Thread Summary
To solve the matrix problem without a calculator, one must understand how to manipulate matrices, including operations like addition and finding determinants. The discussion highlights confusion about whether to find the determinant or solve a system of equations. The values of x that satisfy the given matrix equation are approximately ±4.47. Clarification on the notation used in the problem is also sought, indicating a need for better understanding of matrix operations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of foundational knowledge in matrix manipulation for solving such problems manually.
jjuugg
12
0
hello~ I forgot how to do matrix without a calculator.

I think it was like crossing across and down and then add all of them?

i think... but i wasn't sure.

so could anybody explain how to do matrix with hands?

also, is this problem solvable without a calculator?

find all values of x that make l 2 -1 4 l
l 3 0 5 l = l x 4 l
l 4 1 6 l l 5 x l

and the answer is + or- 4.47

thank you for reading my questions!~><
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your notation at all. Are you supposed to find the determinant of the matrix or solve a system of linear equations?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top