Solve Modular Inverses Homework

  • Thread starter Gale
  • Start date
In summary: I think my teacher meant that when x=-1 it would be -x, not that there is no integer between 0 and n-1 that is equal to x.In summary, the integers x that satisfy 5x≡1 mod 11, 12, 23, and 34 do not exist. The inverse of 3 mod n is 3' mod n.
  • #1
Gale
684
2

Homework Statement



3.) For each of the following a mod n, find a≡1 mod n, i.e. find an integer
x with ax≡1 mod n, or explain why such an integer does not exist:
5' mod 11; (21)' mod 28; 2' mod 101; 4' mod 101:

4.) Let n = 2k+1 be an odd number. What is 2'≡1 mod n? What happens
when n = 2k is even? Now find the multiplicative inverse of 3 mod n:
First suppose n = 3k + 2 for some k. What is 3' mod n? (It looks a
lot like the answer for 2'.) If n = 3k + 1, find 3' mod n as follows.
First find a number x such that 3x≡-1 mod n, and then note that
3(-x)≡1 mod n; finally, write -x as a number between 0 and n - 1.
What if n = 3k?

Homework Equations



ax+by=c, has a solution if gcd(a,b)|c

Euclidean Algorithm

The Attempt at a Solution



So I'm just not sure I've done these problems the right way, or the most efficient way. My answers are often negative, but I figured since its congruence classes, when my answers are -x, it really means [-x] which should be okay? But is that a cop-out? Should I be trying to find representatives between zero and n? Question 4 seems to imply that, but I didn't exactly do the problem the way my teacher suggested, I did it how it made sense to me. So could someone check my work?

Also, in Algebra in general I feel like I write my answers in a weird way or in an odd order. If it seems I've done that, please let me know how you would write your answers in a more elegant or simple to understand way.

3) ax≡1 mod n → ax+kn=1
gcd(5,11)= 1 = 11-2(5) → 5' mod 11= -k

gcd(21,28)= 7 = 28-21. 7 does not dive 1, therefore no solution exists.

gcd(2,101)= 1 = 101-50(2) → 2' mod 101= -50

gcd(4,101)= 1 = 101-25(4) → 4' mod 101= -25

4)n=2k +1, n is odd,
2': gcd(2,2k+1)=1= (2k+1)+ (-k)(2) → 2' mod (2k+1)= -k

n=2k
2': gcd(2,2k)= 2. 2 does not divide 1→ solution does not exist.

n=3k+2
3': gcd(3,3k+2)= 1= 2(3k+2)+ (-2k-1)(3) → 3' mod (3k+2)= -2k-1

n=3k+1
3': gcd(3,3k+1)=1 = (3k+1)+ (-k)(3) → 3' mod (3k+1)= -k

n=3k
3': gcd(3,3k)= 3. 3 does not divide 1 → solution does not exist.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I didn't check every part but it looks generally ok to me. Take the first one. You wrote 5' mod 11= -k, I think you meant 5' mod 11= -2, i.e. that the multiplicative inverse of 5 is -2. That works fine. (-2)*5=(-10)=1 mod 11. You could also express that as a nonnegative value if you want. [-2]=[9] mod 11. So 9*5=45=1 mod 11. Both work fine.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Gale said:

Homework Statement



3.) For each of the following a mod n, find a≡1 mod n, i.e. find an integer
x with ax≡1 mod n, or explain why such an integer does not exist:
5' mod 11; (21)' mod 28; 2' mod 101; 4' mod 101:
A very simple minded way to find the inverse of 5, mod 11:
There is no integer x such that 5x= 1 so look at 11+ 1= 12.
There is no integer x such that 5x= 12 so look at 12+ 11= 23.
There is no integer x such that 5x= 23 so look at 23+ 11= 34.
There is no integer x such that 5x= 34 so look at 34+ 11= 45.
5(9)= 45 so x= 9 (mod 11).

4.) Let n = 2k+1 be an odd number. What is 2'≡1 mod n?
Do you mean "show that [itex]2^{-1}= 1 mod n[/itex]" rather than "What is"?

What happens
when n = 2k is even? Now find the multiplicative inverse of 3 mod n:
First suppose n = 3k + 2 for some k. What is 3' mod n? (It looks a
lot like the answer for 2'.) If n = 3k + 1, find 3' mod n as follows.
First find a number x such that 3x≡-1 mod n, and then note that
3(-x)≡1 mod n; finally, write -x as a number between 0 and n - 1.
What if n = 3k?

Homework Equations



ax+by=c, has a solution if gcd(a,b)|c

Euclidean Algorithm

The Attempt at a Solution



So I'm just not sure I've done these problems the right way, or the most efficient way. My answers are often negative, but I figured since its congruence classes, when my answers are -x, it really means [-x] which should be okay? But is that a cop-out? Should I be trying to find representatives between zero and n? Question 4 seems to imply that, but I didn't exactly do the problem the way my teacher suggested, I did it how it made sense to me. So could someone check my work?
[-x] mod n is the same as [n- x].

Also, in Algebra in general I feel like I write my answers in a weird way or in an odd order. If it seems I've done that, please let me know how you would write your answers in a more elegant or simple to understand way.

3) ax≡1 mod n → ax+kn=1
gcd(5,11)= 1 = 11-2(5) → 5' mod 11= -k
Okay so what is k? Did you mean k= 2? Then saying that the inverse is -2 means it is in the same congruence class as 11- 2= 9.

gcd(21,28)= 7 = 28-21. 7 does not dive 1, therefore no solution exists.
Yes, that is correct. If 21x= 1 (mod 28) then 21x= 1+ 28n. That is the same as 21x- 28n= 7(3x- 4n) cannot be equal to 1 because 1 is not divisible by 7.

gcd(2,101)= 1 = 101-50(2) → 2' mod 101= -50
Yes, this is correct. And -50 is in the same congrunce class as 101- 50= 51. 2(51)= 102= 1 (mod 101).

gcd(4,101)= 1 = 101-25(4) → 4' mod 101= -25
Yes, this is correct. And -25 is in the same congruence class as 101- 25= 76. 4(76)= 304= 3(101)+ 1.

4)n=2k +1, n is odd,
2': gcd(2,2k+1)=1= (2k+1)+ (-k)(2) → 2' mod (2k+1)= -k
And, of course, -k= (2k- 1)- k= k+ 1 mod 2k+ 1. (k+1)(2)= 2k+ 2= (2k+ 1)+ 1.

n=2k
2': gcd(2,2k)= 2. 2 does not divide 1→ solution does not exist.
Yes, for any integer, i, 2i+ m(2k)= 2(i+ mk) is even while 2k+ 1 is odd.

n=3k+2
3': gcd(3,3k+2)= 1= 2(3k+2)+ (-2k-1)(3) → 3' mod (3k+2)= -2k-1
And -2k- 1= 3k+2- 2k- 1= k+ 1 mod 3k+2. 3(k+ 1)= 3k+ 3= (3k+ 2)+ 1.

n=3k+1
3': gcd(3,3k+1)=1 = (3k+1)+ (-k)(3) → 3' mod (3k+1)= -k
And ;-k= 3k+1- k= 2k+ 1 mod 3k+1. 3(2k+1)= 6k+ 3= 6k+ 2+ 1= 2(3k+ 1)+ 1.

n=3k
3': gcd(3,3k)= 3. 3 does not divide 1 → solution does not exist.
Yes. If 3x= 1 (mod 3k) then 3x= 1+ 3k so that 3x- 3k= 3(x- k)= 1 which is not possible.
 

FAQ: Solve Modular Inverses Homework

What is a modular inverse?

A modular inverse is a special type of inverse that is calculated in modular arithmetic. In modular arithmetic, numbers "wrap around" after a certain value, similar to a clock. The modular inverse of a number is the number that, when multiplied by the original number, results in a remainder of 1 when divided by the modulus.

Why is solving for modular inverses important?

Solving for modular inverses is important in many areas of mathematics, including number theory, cryptography, and coding theory. It allows for more efficient calculations and can also be used to solve certain types of equations.

How do you solve for a modular inverse?

To solve for a modular inverse, you can use the extended Euclidean algorithm or Fermat's little theorem. The extended Euclidean algorithm involves finding the greatest common divisor of the original number and the modulus, while Fermat's little theorem uses the fact that for prime moduli, the modular inverse is equal to the original number raised to the power of the modulus minus 2.

What is an example of solving for a modular inverse?

For example, let's say we want to find the modular inverse of 7 mod 11. We can use the extended Euclidean algorithm to find that the GCD of 7 and 11 is 1. Then, using the algorithm, we can find that the modular inverse is 8 mod 11 (since 8 * 7 = 56 and 56 mod 11 is equal to 1).

Are there any restrictions on finding modular inverses?

Yes, there are a few restrictions on finding modular inverses. The modulus and the original number must be relatively prime (have a GCD of 1). Additionally, modular inverses only exist for certain moduli - for example, every number has a modular inverse mod a prime number, but not every number has a modular inverse mod a composite number.

Back
Top