- #1
Guest2
- 193
- 0
I'm trying to answer the question below in the attachment. Could someone please check my answer to part (c), as I'm not sure. Is it correct? Is that that the right geometric explanation for the planes?
(a) The equation is $\begin{pmatrix}1 & -1& 2& 1 \\ 2 & 1 & 1 & -1 \\ 1 & -2 & \lambda & 3 \end{pmatrix} $
(b) $\begin{pmatrix}1 & -1& 2& 1 \\ 2 & 1 & 1 & -1 \\ 1 & -2 & \lambda & 3 \end{pmatrix} \to \begin{pmatrix}1 & -1& 2& 1 \\ 0 & 3 & -3 & -3\\ 0 & -1 & \lambda -2 & 2 \end{pmatrix} \to \begin{pmatrix}1 & -1& 2& 1 \\ 0 & 1 & -1 & -1\\ 0 & 0 & \lambda -3 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$.
Thus the condition for the system to have a unique solution is $\lambda - 3 \ne 0 \implies \lambda \ne 3$.
And if $\lambda \ne 3$ then $ z = \frac{1}{\lambda-3}$ then $y = \frac{1}{\lambda-3}-1$ and $x = -\frac{1}{\lambda-3}$ is the unique solution to the system.
(c) If $\lambda = 3$ then the system has no solution. For all other values of $\lambda$ there's exactly one unique solution (given above). Geometrically it means their intersection is a point.
(a) The equation is $\begin{pmatrix}1 & -1& 2& 1 \\ 2 & 1 & 1 & -1 \\ 1 & -2 & \lambda & 3 \end{pmatrix} $
(b) $\begin{pmatrix}1 & -1& 2& 1 \\ 2 & 1 & 1 & -1 \\ 1 & -2 & \lambda & 3 \end{pmatrix} \to \begin{pmatrix}1 & -1& 2& 1 \\ 0 & 3 & -3 & -3\\ 0 & -1 & \lambda -2 & 2 \end{pmatrix} \to \begin{pmatrix}1 & -1& 2& 1 \\ 0 & 1 & -1 & -1\\ 0 & 0 & \lambda -3 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$.
Thus the condition for the system to have a unique solution is $\lambda - 3 \ne 0 \implies \lambda \ne 3$.
And if $\lambda \ne 3$ then $ z = \frac{1}{\lambda-3}$ then $y = \frac{1}{\lambda-3}-1$ and $x = -\frac{1}{\lambda-3}$ is the unique solution to the system.
(c) If $\lambda = 3$ then the system has no solution. For all other values of $\lambda$ there's exactly one unique solution (given above). Geometrically it means their intersection is a point.