MHB Solve System Problem: x^4+y^4=8^2 & x-y=2

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the system of equations \(x^4+y^4=64\) and \(x-y=2\). Participants derive a quartic equation by substituting \(y=x-2\) into the first equation, leading to \(x^4 - 4x^3 + 12x^2 - 16x - 24 = 0\). The analysis reveals that this quartic has two real roots, which can be expressed as \(x = 1 \pm \sqrt{2\sqrt{10}-3}\). The factorization of the quartic confirms the existence of two real roots and two complex roots for \(y\). The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying solutions against the original equations to avoid spurious results.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Problem:
Solve the system $x^4+y^4=8^2$ and $x-y=2$.

Attempt:
$(x+y)^4=x^4+4x^3y+6x^2y^2+4xy^3+y^4$

$(x+y)^4=(x^4+y^4)+4xy(x^2+y^2)+6x^2y^2$

$(x+y)^4=8^2+4xy((x-y)^2+2xy)+6x^2y^2$

$(x+y)^4=64+4xy((2)^2+2xy)+6x^2y^2$

$(x+y)^4=64+16xy+14x^2y^2$

Up to this point, I know that I need to form another equation (with $(x+y)^4$ the subject) that has only terms of xy...

$x-y=2$

$(x-y)^2=2^2$

$x^2+y^2-2xy=4$

$(x+y)^2-4xy=4$

$(x+y)^4=(4+4xy)^2=16+32xy+16x^2y^2$

$\therefore 64+16xy+14x^2y^2=16+32xy+16x^2y^2$

$x^2y^2+8xy-24=0$

And by using the quadratic formula to solve for xy, I get:

$\displaystyle xy=\frac{-8 \pm \sqrt {8^2-4(-24)(1)}}{2}=\frac{-8 \pm 4 \sqrt{10}}{2}=-4 \pm 2\sqrt{10}$

I then solve the values for y by multiplying each and every term of the equation $x-y=2$ by y, and obtained another quadratic equation in terms of y and from there, I managed to find all 4 pairs of answers accordingly.

Now, I was wondering if there are any other methods to tackle this problem effectively.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think you should double-check your answers against the original equation - you might have gained a few spurious solutions. This plot seems to indicate there should only be two solutions. Your solution method is very elegant, I'm not sure I know of a better.
 
Substitute $y=x-2$ in the equation $x^4+y^4 = 8^2$, you get a quartic equation for $x$, namely $x^4+(x-2)^4 = 64$, which simplifies to $x^4 - 4x^3 + 12x^2 - 16x - 24 = 0.$ Looking at Ackbach's plot of the functions, it appears that there are only two real roots for $x$, and it looks as though their sum is very close to $2$. That made me wonder whether the quartic might have a factorisation of the form $x^4 - 4x^3 + 12x^2 - 16x - 24 = (x^2-2x+a)(x^2-2x+b)$. Comparing coefficients, you can check that this is indeed the case, with $a = 4 - 2\sqrt{10}$ and $b = 4 + 2\sqrt{10}$. The first factor has two real roots $x = 1\pm\sqrt{2\sqrt{10}-3}$ (and the second factor has no real roots). So the solutions for $x$ are $\boxed{1\pm\sqrt{2\sqrt{10}-3}}$.

Edit. Since $y = x-2$, the factors $x^2-2x + 4\pm2\sqrt{10}$ above are just another way of writing the factors $xy + 4\pm2\sqrt{10}$ that anemone had already found. So all that was needed was to make that substitution $y = x-2$, and you get two quadratic equations for $x$, one with the two real roots and the other with the two complex roots.
 
Last edited:
Ackbach said:
I think you should double-check your answers against the original equation - you might have gained a few spurious solutions. This plot seems to indicate there should only be two solutions. Your solution method is very elegant, I'm not sure I know of a better.

Ops, I forgot to double-check the answers...thanks for reminding me and that's so nice of you to say that my solution method is elegant...

Thanks, Ackbach!:)

Opalg said:
Substitute $y=x-2$ in the equation $x^4+y^4 = 8^2$, you get a quartic equation for $x$, namely $x^4+(x-2)^4 = 64$, which simplifies to $x^4 - 4x^3 + 12x^2 - 16x - 24 = 0.$ Looking at Ackbach's plot of the functions, it appears that there are only two real roots for $x$, and it looks as though their sum is very close to $2$. That made me wonder whether the quartic might have a factorisation of the form $x^4 - 4x^3 + 12x^2 - 16x - 24 = (x^2-2x+a)(x^2-2x+b)$. Comparing coefficients, you can check that this is indeed the case, with $a = 4 - 2\sqrt{10}$ and $b = 4 + 2\sqrt{10}$. The first factor has two real roots $x = 1\pm\sqrt{2\sqrt{10}-3}$ (and the second factor has no real roots). So the solutions for $x$ are $\boxed{1\pm\sqrt{2\sqrt{10}-3}}$.

Edit. Since $y = x-2$, the factors $x^2-2x + 4\pm2\sqrt{10}$ above are just another way of writing the factors $xy + 4\pm2\sqrt{10}$ that anemone had already found. So all that was needed was to make that substitution $y = x-2$, and you get two quadratic equations for $x$, one with the two real roots and the other with the two complex roots.

Thanks, Opalg! Your approaches to the questions I post here at MHB are always surprisingly insightful to me.(Happy)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top