Solve the simultaneous equations

  • Thread starter chwala
  • Start date
  • #1
chwala
Gold Member
2,773
396
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
understanding of simultaneous equations
1693394172141.png
In my approach i have,

x+y=34xy

and
(x+y)3=x3+y3+3xy(x+y)

(0.75xy)3=9xy+3xy(0.75xy)

Let m=xy

0.421875m32.25m29m=0

m1=8,m2=2.6 and m3=1.37×1010

using

m1=8=xy

we shall have,

x3+y3=9xy

x3+y3=72

since,

x+y=6

then it follows that

x3+(6x)372=0

x3+21636x72x+12x2+6x2x372=0

18x2108x+144=0

x=4,y=2

x=2,y=4

... other values can be found in a similar manner...There may be a better approach than mine hence my post. Cheers.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think m3=0.

You can check for yourself that 2,4 is a solution.

The third solution is the tricky one. I think you need to find and check that one.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Math100, topsquark and SammyS
  • #3
If you write that using rational fractions, rather than decimal fractions, you have:

(34)3(xy)3=9xy+3xy(34)xy

Rearranging and simplifying gives:

(2764)(xy)3(94)(xy)29(xy)=0

Multiplying through by 649 gives:

3(xy)316(xy)264(xy)=0

Factoring the left hand side gives:

(xy8)(3xy+8)(xy)=0
 
  • Like
Likes D H, chwala and topsquark
  • #4
That you wrote that second line is a sign that you are depending on your calculator too much.

And, as I mentioned in another thread, it would be a good idea to not use decimals.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes D H and DaveE
  • #5
topsquark said:
That you wrote that second line is a sign that you are depending on your calculator too much.

And, as I mentioned in another thread, it would be a good idea to not use decimals.

-Dan
@topsquark thanks let me check on how to minimise calculator in my working. Your other points are well noted..i do skip some steps as I assume that my audience (you guys) are quite highly intelligent people to see in between the lines...my bad. I'll work on showing the required steps man!

Cheers mate.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #6
chwala said:
let me check on how to minimise calculator in my working.
Not much to check. When you're working on a problem in algebra, don't use a calculator, or at least not until the final step.

chwala said:
i do skip some steps as I assume that my audience (you guys) are quite highly intelligent people to see in between the lines
Sure, we can probably fill in missing details, but we're working for free, and might not want to take the time to do so.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DaveE, MatinSAR, chwala and 2 others
  • #7
topsquark said:
That you wrote that second line is a sign that you are depending on your calculator too much.

And, as I mentioned in another thread, it would be a good idea to not use decimals.

-Dan
Dan,
Ok we shall have (without calc),

(0.75xy)3=9xy+3xy(0.75xy)

letting xy=m

2764m3=9m+94m2

27m3=576m+144m2

27m3576m144m2=0

m(27m2144m576)=0

m1=0

27m2144m576=0

m=144±20736+6220854


m=144±8294454

m=144±28854

m2=8 and m3=2.67 to two decimal places.

From here the steps to solution will follow. Cheers man.
 
  • #8
chwala said:
Dan,
Ok we shall have (without calc),

(0.75xy)3=9xy+3xy(0.75xy)

letting xy=m

2764m3=9m+94m2

27m3=576m+144m2

27m3576m144m2=0

m(27m2144m576)=0

m1=0

27m2144m576=0

m=144±20736+6220854


m=144±8294454

m=144±28854

m2=8 and m3=2.67 to two decimal places.

From here the steps to solution will follow. Cheers man.
Don't know if this is the input you're looking for, but you could have divided your equation through by 9, to end with
3m216m64.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala and Mark44
  • #9
PeroK said:
I think m3=0.

You can check for yourself that 2,4 is a solution.

The third solution is the tricky one. I think you need to find and check that one.
The third solution will be given using m=2.67

We then have,

x+y=2.0025
x3+y3=24.03

x3+(x36x212x8)+24.03=0

6x212x+16.03=0

x=2.91 and y=0.91 correct to two decimal points.
 
  • #10
chwala said:
x=2.91 and y=0.91 correct to two decimal points.
The words "correct to two decimal [places]" should never appear anywhere in the answer to an algebra problem. PUT YOUR CALCULATOR AWAY.

chwala said:
m=144±28854
Think about what you are writing down: what can you immediately see about all the terms in this equation?

chwala said:
m3=1.37×1010
Do you really think that is true? Can you not see that a calculator is no use to you - in fact it is almost always a hindrance - in algebra?

You need to replace your calculator skills with skills in spotting common factors:
- Even numbers should be obvious
- If the digits sum to a multiple of 3 the whole is a multiple of 3
- If the digits sum to a multiple of 9 the whole is a multiple of 9
- If the last digit is 0 or 5 the whole is a multiple of 5
- If the smallest number is a multiple of 7 (you should be able to spot these immediately for 2 digit numbers) it can be worth checking all the numbers for divisibility by 7 (this is the only time your calculator can be helpful)
 
  • Like
Likes chwala and D H
  • #11
pbuk said:
The words "correct to two decimal [places]" should never appear anywhere in the answer to an algebra problem. PUT YOUR CALCULATOR AWAY.


Think about what you are writing down: what can you immediately see about all the terms in this equation?


Do you really think that is true? Can you not see that a calculator is no use to you - in fact it is almost always a hindrance - in algebra?


You need to replace your calculator skills with skills in spotting common factors:
- Even numbers should be obvious
- If the digits sum to a multiple of 3 the whole is a multiple of 3
- If the digits sum to a multiple of 9 the whole is a multiple of 9
- If the last digit is 0 or 5 the whole is a multiple of 5
- If the smallest number is a multiple of 7 (you should be able to spot these immediately for 2 digit numbers) it can be worth checking all the numbers for divisibility by 7 (this is the only time your calculator can be helpful)
Didn't think much into it... I was quickly looking for solutions to the problem,...with that said I'll most definitely work out the solutions as you've rightly put it... will get back on this later. Thanks.
 
  • #12
chwala said:
I was quickly looking for solutions to the problem
But you were going about it the wrong way: the way to quickly find solutions to algebra problems is to practice quickly simplifying expressions, including extracting common factors, not to reach for a calculator.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
  • #13
IMG_2858.jpeg
FYI, here is a graph showing the intersection of the two curves.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
  • #14
pbuk said:
But you were going about it the wrong way: the way to quickly find solutions to algebra problems is to practice quickly simplifying expressions, including extracting common factors, not to reach for a calculator.
It was not much of a big deal... i thought i had missed out on something real important...like i said i just was seeking solutions but i do get your point all the same...

using, m=83

x+y=34xy
x+y=2

We then have, from my previous working...

x+y=2
x3+y3=723

x3+(x36x212x8)+723=0

6x2+12x16=0

3x2+6x8=0

...

x=2.91 and y=0.91 correct to two decimal points... or solutions can also be given in exact form using the quadratic formula. Cheers man.
 
  • #15
bob012345 said:
View attachment 356433FYI, here is a graph showing the intersection of the two curves.
It could be more useful if you could demonstrate/find alternative ways to solve the problem algebraically...the graph illustration is quite clear with me...
 
Last edited:
  • #16
chwala said:
It could be more useful if you could demonstrate/find alternative ways to solve the problem algebraically...the graph illustration is quite clear with me...
You can use the lines from the origin to the intercept points which have the form y=ax. Substitute into each equation and get two solutions for x=f(a). Set those equal to each other and you get a polynomial in a. Solving that gives four values for the slopes 1/2,2,1/4(sqrt(33)7),1/4(sqrt(33)+7). Use those to get the nonzero x,y values.
 
  • #17
chwala said:
(0.75xy)3=9xy+3xy(0.75xy)
Just piling on: Please refrain from doing this. Instead keep the 0.75 as 3/4. Doing so will benefit you in the long run. Plus, this is a sign that you are relying on your calculator far too much.


Keeping this to rational factors, this is better expressed as 2764m394m29m=0, or
(1)(m)(2764m294m9)=0
You should not have fed the equation you found to a calculator. It will blindly see that it was given a cubic and use its cubic solver. This is a cubic, but it also is m times a quadratic in m. The only solutions are m=0 and the two solutions to the quadratic, 3m216m64=0.

The trivial solution, m=0, can and must be ruled out due to the problem statement, which involves divisions by x and by y. This means that both x and y must be non-zero for the problem statement to make sense, and hence so must their product xym be non-zero. Sometimes making substitutions or equating two expressions can introduce false solutions. That definitely is the case here, where the trivial solution is a false solution. This is something to be aware of and be on the watch for.

The quadratic equation 3m216m64=0 can be factored fairly easily. If a root is an integer, it must be a factor of 64. 1, 2, and 4 are easy to rule out. m=8 works perfectly, yielding (m8)(3m+8)=0 as the factorization. Alternatively, the generic quadratic equation solver works nicely here. Both approaches yield m=8 as one solution and m=83 (rather than m2.6 or m2.7) as the second solution.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala, Mark44 and pbuk
  • #18
bob012345 said:
View attachment 356433 FYI, here is a graph showing the intersection of the two curves.
The one solution that can easily be ascertained from the graph is y=y=0. This is a false solution. There are four points that represent true solutions where neither x nor y is zero.
 
  • #19
D H said:
The one solution that can easily be ascertained from the graph is y=y=0. This is a false solution. There are four points that represent true solutions where neither x nor y is zero.
I think the upper right quadrant solutions are pretty clear visually from the plot.
 
  • #20
@chwala I did it this way, similar to your original post somehow, except I didn't use a calculator at all. This led to an error in your calculations, which is why you didn't consider xy=0 as a possibility. From your right equation you have:1x+1y=34x+yxy=34This means you can consider: x+y=3kxy=4k All that remains is to express the left equation in terms of x+y and xy. x3+y3=9xy(x+y)(3xy+(x+y)2)=9xy (3k)(12k+9k2)=36k k(3k24k4)=0 k=0,2,23Now you need to solve : x+y=0,6,2xy=0,8,8/3 The first scenario is not acceptable. The second situation is the one you derived: x=4y=2 or x=2y=4 Third situation is x+y=2 and xy=8/3 so your (x,y) pair is going to be: (1+333, 1333)or(1333, 1+333)
 
  • Like
Likes D H and chwala
  • #21
Smart move!
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
865
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
924
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top