Solve Volterra Equation: Integral Equation Guide

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date
In summary,This person found a way to solve the Volterra equation by substituting the derivative into the original equation and solving for the new variable. This process is not trivial and may require some typing in of the derivative. Once the new variable is found, solving for it yields a first order ordinary differential equation. The solution to this equation is not trivial.
  • #1
Dustinsfl
2,281
5
How do I solve the Volterra integral equation?
\[
f(x) = \sqrt{x} + \lambda\int_0^x\sqrt{xy}f(y)dy
\]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: volterra eq

dwsmith said:
How do I solve the Volterra integral equation?
\[
f(x) = \sqrt{x} + \lambda\int_0^x\sqrt{xy}f(y)dy
\]

Have you tried differentiating it?

.
 
  • #3
Re: volterra eq

zzephod said:
Have you tried differentiating it?

.

The derivative is
\[
f'(x) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}} + \lambda\left(xf(x) + \int_0^1\frac{y}{2\sqrt{xy}}f(y)dy\right)
\]
How does this help?
 
  • #4
Re: volterra eq

dwsmith said:
The derivative is
\[
f'(x) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}} + \lambda\left(xf(x) + \int_0^1\frac{y}{2\sqrt{xy}}f(y)dy\right)
\]
How does this help?

Now you can replace the integral in the expression for the derivative by the expression for it you get from the original equation leaving you with a first order ordinary differential equation.

(and you should still have \(x\) as the upper limit in the integral, you will also find things easier if you take the \(x\) outside the integral)

.
 
  • #5
Re: volterra eq

zzephod said:
Now you can replace the integral in the expression for the derivative by the expression for it you get from the original equation leaving you with a first order ordinary differential equation.

(and you should still have \(x\) as the upper limit in the integral, you will also find things easier if you take the \(x\) outside the integral)

.

So
\[
\int_0^x\sqrt{y}f(y)dy = \frac{f(x) - \sqrt{x}}{\lambda\sqrt{x}}
\]
Plugging this in we get
\[
f'(x) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}} - \frac{1}{2\lambda\sqrt{x}} + f(x)\left(x\lambda + \frac{1}{2\lambda\sqrt{x}}\right).
\]
IWhat am I suppose to do with the \(f'(x)\) equation? The solution to this ODE isn't trivial.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Re: volterra eq

dwsmith said:
So
\[
\int_0^x\sqrt{y}f(y)dy = \frac{f(x) - \sqrt{x}}{\lambda\sqrt{x}}
\]
Plugging this in we get
\[
f'(x) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}} - \frac{1}{2\lambda\sqrt{x}} + f(x)\left(x\lambda + \frac{1}{2\lambda\sqrt{x}}\right).
\]
IWhat am I suppose to do with the \(f'(x)\) equation? The solution to this ODE isn't trivial.

Well for \(x>0\), I get:

\[f'(x)=f(x)\left[\frac{1}{2x}+\lambda x\right]\]

which assuming no (further) mistakes in the manipulations is of variables seperable type with initial condition \(f(0)=0\)

Note the derivative is:

\[\frac{d}{d\,x}\,f\left( x\right) = \frac{\lambda\,\int_{0}^{x}\sqrt{y}\,f\left( y\right) dy}{2\,\sqrt{x}}+\lambda\,x\,f\left( x\right) +\frac{1}{2\,\sqrt{x}}\]

.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Re: volterra eq

zzephod said:
Well for \(x>0\), I get:

\[f'(x)=f(x)\left[-\frac{1}{2x}+\lambda x\right]\]

which assuming no mistakes in the manipulations is of variables seperable type with initial condition \(f(0)=0\)

.

How did you get that expression?
 
  • #8
Re: volterra eq

dwsmith said:
How did you get that expression?

By substituting \(\frac{f(x) - \sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}}\) for \(\lambda \int_0^x\sqrt{y}f(y)dy \) in the expression for the derivative.
 
  • #9
Re: volterra eq

zzephod said:
By substituting \(\frac{f(x) - \sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}}\) for \(\lambda \int_0^x\sqrt{y}f(y)dy \) in the expression for the derivative.

Shouldn't it be + not minus? Also, for +, the ODE evaluates to
\[
f(x) = C \sqrt{x} e^{\frac{\lambda x^2}{2}}.
\]
With the IC of \(f(0) = 0\), \(f(x) = C\cdot 0 = 0\).
 
  • #10
Re: volterra eq

dwsmith said:
Shouldn't it be + not minus?

... probably

.
 
  • #11
Re: volterra eq

dwsmith said:
Shouldn't it be + not minus? Also, for +, the ODE evaluates to
\[
f(x) = C \sqrt{x} e^{\frac{\lambda x^2}{2}}.
\]
With the IC of \(f(0) = 0\), \(f(x) = C\cdot 0 = 0\).

Which suggests that we go back to the original integral equation and rewrite it in terms of \(h(x)=f(x)/\sqrt{x}\), which if all has gone well is:

\[h(x)=1+\lambda \int_0^x y\; h(y)\ dy\]

which gives initial condition \(h(0)=1\) and:

\[h'(x) = x h(x)\]
which I think results in \(C=1\).

.
 

FAQ: Solve Volterra Equation: Integral Equation Guide

What is a Volterra equation?

A Volterra equation is a type of integral equation that involves an unknown function being integrated over a certain interval. It is named after the Italian mathematician Vito Volterra who first studied these types of equations.

How do you solve a Volterra equation?

The most common method for solving a Volterra equation is through the use of numerical methods, such as the Euler method or the Runge-Kutta method. These methods involve approximating the integral in the equation and solving for the unknown function iteratively.

What is the significance of the Volterra equation in science?

Volterra equations have many applications in various fields of science, such as physics, engineering, biology, and economics. They are used to model systems that involve dynamic processes, such as population growth, chemical reactions, and electrical circuits.

Are there any analytical methods for solving Volterra equations?

Yes, there are a few analytical methods for solving Volterra equations, but they are limited to specific types of equations and can be quite complex. These methods include the Fredholm alternative, the Banach fixed-point theorem, and the Picard iteration method.

Can you solve a Volterra equation with multiple unknown functions?

Yes, it is possible to solve a Volterra equation with multiple unknown functions, but it can be more challenging and may require the use of more advanced numerical methods. In some cases, the equation can be transformed into a system of equations, which can then be solved using matrices or other methods.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top