Solving A^2 + 3A + I = 0: Inverse & -A-3I

  • Thread starter EvLer
  • Start date
In summary, if a matrix A satisfies a polynomial with a non-zero constant coefficient, it is invertible. This can be seen by factoring the polynomial and using the distributive law for matrices. Additionally, for a diagonal matrix with non-zero diagonal entries, the polynomial (A-c1)(A-c2)...(A-cn) has a non-zero constant term and thus the matrix is invertible.
  • #1
EvLer
458
0
I have not come across this kind of problem, hence, not sure:

A is nxn, such that A^2 + 3A + I = 0
show that A is invertible and A^(-1) = -A-3I

So far I have this:

-A^2 - 3A = I

but now I am not sure if I can factor out A:

(-1)A [A + 3] = I

because I do not think that A + 3 is defined for matrices, since 3 is a scalar and not actually a vector.

Any hints are very much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
3 A = 3 A I
 
  • #3
Thanks I will try to work it out.
But just to confirm, it's wrong to factor in this case?
So far I have this solution, even though I factored afterall :redface:

(-1) A [A + 3] = I

(-1)A A^(-1) [A + 3] = I A^(-1)

(-1) [A + 3] = I A^(-1)

I^(-1) (-1)[A + 3] = I^(-1) I A^(-1)

-AI - 3I = A^(-1)

:confused:
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Factoring is fine for matrices, they satisfy the distributive law:

P(Q + R) = PQ + PR
and
(P + Q)R = PR + QR
 
  • #5
Oh, so I can represent 3A as 3 A I and then factor out A and end up with 3 I which is theoretically a matrix?
 
  • #6
It's not just theoretically a matrix. :smile:
 
  • #7
Anyways, an easier way to do the problem is to simply multiply A and the hypothesized A^-1, and check if you get I. (Don't forget to apply the polynomial identity A satisfies)

However, the work you did would be necessary if you weren't given a guess for A^-1.
 
  • #8
Shish! I see it now :bugeye: .
Thanks!
 
  • #9
However, you appear to be assuming that A has an inverse in your work which is what you want to prove.

What you can do is simply start with A^2 + 3A + I = 0, write that
as -A^2- 3A= I or (-A-3I)A= A(-A-3I)= I. Now what is the DEFINITION of inverse?
 
  • #10
so, then from this by DEFINITION of inverse:
AB=I=BA, where B is inverse, and given A(-A-3I)=I i can conclude that B in this case is (-A-3I).
I hope I am not making assumptions again...
Thank you all.
 
  • #11
Yes, of course. The inverse of A is just -A-3I.
 
  • #12
so the general principle is that if A satisfies a polynomial with non zero constant coiefficient then A is invertible. (over a field).

think about a diagonal matrix, with diagonal entries c1,...cn.

Then A satisfies (A-c1)(A-c2)...(A-cn), which has non zero constant term if and only if all the diagonal entries ci were non zero.
 

FAQ: Solving A^2 + 3A + I = 0: Inverse & -A-3I

What is the purpose of solving A^2 + 3A + I = 0?

The purpose of solving A^2 + 3A + I = 0 is to find the inverse of a matrix (A) and determine if it has a unique solution.

What is the meaning of inverse in this equation?

Inverse in this equation refers to finding the matrix (A^-1) that, when multiplied by the original matrix (A), results in the identity matrix (I). This is known as the inverse property of matrices.

How do you solve A^2 + 3A + I = 0?

To solve A^2 + 3A + I = 0, you can use the quadratic formula or factor the equation into (A+I)(A+3I) = 0 and set each factor equal to 0. Then, solve for A to find the possible values of A that satisfy the equation.

What is the significance of -A-3I in this equation?

The term -A-3I is used to set the equation equal to 0, as this is the standard form for solving inverse matrices. It represents the inverse of the matrix (A) multiplied by -3, which is then added to the identity matrix (I).

Are there any special cases to consider when solving this equation?

Yes, there are two special cases to consider when solving A^2 + 3A + I = 0. The first is when A+I=0, which means that A is equal to -I and has no inverse. The second is when A+3I=0, which means that A is equal to -3I and also has no inverse.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
978
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top