Solving a Puzzling Limit Problem

  • Thread starter Buri
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Limit
In summary: This is known as the "limit of a product" theorem, which states that if the limit as x approaches a of f(x) is equal to L, and the limit as x approaches a of g(x) is equal to M, then the limit as x approaches a of f(x)g(x) is equal to LM. This theorem only holds if both of the individual limits exist.
  • #1
Buri
273
0
A limit problem!

I was trying to calculate the following limit:

lim {x-> infinity} (x² + 2x)^(1/2) - x

I manipulate f(x) in such a way:

f(x) = (x² + 2x)^(1/2) - x
f(x) = [x²(1 + 2/x)]^(1/2) - x
f(x) = |x|(1 + 2/x)^(1/2) - x

As x goes to infinity |x| = x. Therefore,

f(x) = x( [1 + 2/x]^(1/2) - 1 ]

After taking the limit I'm getting infinity times 0 which would mean the limit is equal to zero (I think). However, this isn't the right answer and the way I was supposed to do it was multiply f(x) by its "conjugate" to get the limit as equal to 1. But, I've tried figuring out why I can't do the above, but I just don't see it. So I'd appreciate the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Buri said:
...I'm getting infinity times 0 which would mean the limit is equal to zero (I think).

Here is your mistake. You must remember that infinity is not a number.

in your function f(x) = x( [1 + 2/x]^(1/2) - 1 ] you have, as you point out, one portion going to infinity and the other going to zero. Think of it this way:

How, in a limit sense, can you represent infinity? Easy: lim {x-> infinity} x

How, in a limit sense, can you represent zero? Easy: lim {x-> infinity} 1/x

What happens when you combine the two?

lim {x-> infinity} x* 1/x

which is the same as:

lim {x-> infinity} 1

which is 1.

Now, the above is not how you would prove lim {x-> infinity} (x² + 2x)^(1/2) - x=1.

Have you tried multiplying the function by its conjugate (do you know what that means)?
 
Last edited:
  • #3


Multiply and divide by [itex]\sqrt{x^{2} + 2 x} + x[/itex] and use the rule [itex](a - b)(a + b) = a^{2} - b^{2}[/itex] in the denominator.
 
  • #4


Buri said:
After taking the limit I'm getting infinity times 0 which would mean the limit is equal to zero

There is your problem. "Infinity times zero" is an undefined number, precisely because you would be able to get it equal to anything you'd like. For example, consider the limit
[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \left( x \cdot \frac{a}{x} \right)[/tex]
which would be equal to 0 by your reasoning (x goes to infinity while a/x goes to 0 for any number a, including a = 0)

Of course, first simplifying, you see that it is
[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{a x}{x} = \lim_{x \to \infty} a = a[/tex]

Moral to the story: Whenever you encounter undefined forms in limit operations (like 0/0, or 0 . infinity) you need to exercise more care.
 
  • #5


It's already been explained why infinity times zero isn't necessarily zero. The usual way to deal with indeterminate forms is to use L'Hopital's rule. If

[tex]\lim{x\rightarrow \infty} f(x)g(x) = \infty 0[/tex],

then consider f(x)/(1/g(x)). The limit of this is [/itex]\infty/\infty[/itex], so by L'Hopital's rule

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} f(x)g(x) = \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{f(x)}{1/g(x)} = \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{f'(x)}{(1/g(x))'}[/tex].

There are other ways to evaluate the limit. You were asked to use a conjugate method, which Dickfore gave. Another method is to consider that for x positive

f(x) = x( [1 + 2/x]^(1/2) - 1 ]

is exact. Since 1/x is small, though, you can expand the square root function [itex](1 + 2/x)^{1/2}[/itex] in a taylor series about 1/x = 0. Try that too. (It is easier than L'Hopital's rule).
 
  • #6


Thanks a lot guys! I had actually done it by multiplying it by its conjugate, but I didn't see why I couldn't do it the way I did it above. I hadn't noticed that lim x * a/x shows my reasoning is incorrect. Thanks a lot for the help!
 
  • #7


CompuChip said:
There is your problem. "Infinity times zero" is an undefined number, precisely because you would be able to get it equal to anything you'd like. For example, consider the limit
[tex]\lim_{x \to \infty} \left( x \cdot \frac{a}{x} \right)[/tex]

Just another question. Why is it that I can't break the above limit as follows:

lim x * lim a/x

Is it because lim x doesn't exist? Does the limit property for the product of two functions only apply when the individual limits exist?
 
  • #8


Buri said:
Just another question. Why is it that I can't break the above limit as follows:

lim x * lim a/x
Precisely for the reason I show in my post: it would give an undeterminate form (0 x infinity).

Is it because lim x doesn't exist? Does the limit property for the product of two functions only apply when the individual limits exist?

Yep, it is true that if
[tex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L_f[/tex]
and
[tex]\lim_{x \to a} g(x) = L_g[/tex]
where Lf and Lg are numbers (even zero is allowed, but - again - infinity is not a number) then
[tex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x) \cdot g(x) = L_f \cdot L_g[/tex]
and
[tex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x) / g(x) = L_f / L_g[/tex]
(as long as Lg is not zero).
 
  • #9


Okay, thanks for your help! :)
 
  • #10


Buri said:
Just another question. Why is it that I can't break the above limit as follows:

lim x * lim a/x

Is it because lim x doesn't exist? Does the limit property for the product of two functions only apply when the individual limits exist?

Yes.
 

FAQ: Solving a Puzzling Limit Problem

How do I approach a limit problem?

When solving a limit problem, the first step is to try to simplify the expression by factoring or using algebraic manipulations. If the expression cannot be simplified, you can try using substitution or using the properties of limits such as the limit laws. If these methods do not work, you may have to use more advanced techniques such as L'Hopital's rule or the squeeze theorem.

What is the difference between a one-sided and a two-sided limit?

A one-sided limit only considers the behavior of the function as it approaches the value from one direction, either from the left or the right. A two-sided limit, on the other hand, considers the behavior of the function as it approaches the value from both directions. This means that the left and right-hand limits must be equal for a two-sided limit to exist.

How do I know if a limit does not exist?

A limit does not exist if the left and right-hand limits are not equal, or if the function has a vertical asymptote at the limiting value. Additionally, if the function oscillates or has a jump discontinuity at the limiting value, the limit does not exist.

What is the significance of continuity in limit problems?

Continuity is important in limit problems because it guarantees that the limit at a point will be equal to the value of the function at that point. This means that if a function is continuous at a point, you can simply plug in the value to find the limit. If a function is not continuous at a point, you will have to use other methods to find the limit.

Can I use a graph to solve a limit problem?

Yes, a graph can be a useful tool in solving a limit problem. By looking at the behavior of the function near the limiting value, you can make an educated guess about the value of the limit. However, a graph should not be relied upon as the sole method for finding a limit, as it is not always accurate and cannot provide a definitive answer.

Similar threads

Back
Top