Solving a Root Equation for the Variable r

  • Thread starter thomas49th
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Root
You must have made a mistake. I haven't made one.2. You must have looked at a different problem.well the question was:Express\frac{1}{x - 2} + \frac{2}{x+4}as a single algergraic factionI have the answer and it's\frac{x+10}{3(x+4)}yeah, I figured out what I did wrong. I forgot to factorize the top partI forgot to dox + 2x = 3xx * 2 = 2x.In summary, the conversation discusses the process of rearranging an equation to find a specific variable. The equation A = π
  • #36
okay, so whenever you've got a surd in your denominator, you are to rationalize it. Fine by me; mind you, that is THEIR choice, not everybody's else's choice.

Remember that [tex]1=\frac{\sqrt{6}-\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{6}-\sqrt{2}}[/tex]
See if you can use that to derive their answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
[tex]\frac{3}{(\sqrt{6} + \sqrt{2})}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{3(\sqrt{6} - \sqrt{2})}{(\sqrt{6} + \sqrt{2})(\sqrt{6} - \sqrt{2})}[/tex]

use smilie face method on denominator

root 6 x root 6 = 6
root 2 x - root 2 = - 2

root 6 x - root 2 = - root 12
root 6 x root 2 = root 12

- root 12 and root 12 cancel each other out. 6 - 2 = 4



leaving you with
[tex]\frac{3(\sqrt{6} - \sqrt{2})}4[/tex]

am I right or am I right?
 
Last edited:
  • #38
Indeed you are right. Here is a true smilie for you: :smile:
 
  • #39
Okay. I've got some more problems i wish to solve

Express
[tex]\frac{1}{x - 2} + \frac{2}{x+4} [/tex]
as a single algergraic faction
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #40
So, what is the least common multiple of the denominators?
 
  • #41
would it be 2?
 
  • #42
Does x-2 divide 2?? Does x+4 divide 2??
 
  • #43
is it (x-2)(x+4) = x² -8 + 2x
 
Last edited:
  • #44
ahh me thinks you cross multiply?

[tex]\frac{x+4 + 2(x-2)}{(x-2)(x+4)}[/tex]
 
  • #45
I do not cross-multiply here either, I EXPAND both fractions in the manner you've just done.
 
  • #46
To add the fractions I need to find a common denominator right?
What ever I do to the denominator I must do to the numerator right?
So how do I find the lost common mulitple of x-2 and x+4?


Thanks
 
  • #47
You've done it just fine, as I've said.
Just don't call it cross-multiplication.
 
  • #48
so I am at [tex]\frac{3x}{x^{2}+2x-8}[/tex]
now where to? That's not the final answer is it?
 
  • #49
Looks final to me, given your task to find a SINGLE algebraic fraction identical to the given sum.
 
  • #50
Ive looked this up on an old test paper, and apparently the answer is 1/3

The final step before the answer I've written

3x / ((x-2)(x+4))

but I don't know how I got 1/3...do you?
 
  • #51
That's impossible.
you have most likely miscopied the original problem.
 
  • #52
Ok, must of done. Now interestly the next question on the paper is

Hence or otherwise sove

[tex] \frac{1}{x-2} + \frac{2}{x+4} = \frac{1}{3}[/tex]

so I will EXPAND the fractions (or cross multiply)?
this will give me

9x = x² - 2x + 4x - 8
so this is a quadratic. - 9x

x² -7x + 8 = 0
(x + 1)(x-8) = 0
so x = -1 or x= 8

that correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #53
Which is a totally different issue altogether!
What you have there is an EQUATION, what you said before was that that equality was an IDENTITY (which is NOT correct).
 
  • #54
aha i see
to solve it then

[tex] \frac{1}{x-2} + \frac{2}{x+4} = \frac{1}{3}[/tex]

so I will EXPAND the fractions (or cross multiply)?
this will give me

9x = x² - 2x + 4x - 8
so this is a quadratic. - 9x

x² -7x + 8 = 0
(x + 1)(x-8) = 0
so x = -1 or x= 8

that correct?
 
  • #55
Seems so, yes.
 
  • #56
O, right first time...

Now here's a hard one I don't get

Find the value of

m when [tex]\sqrt{128} = 2^{m}[/tex]

I no straight away from binary that 2^7 is 128 does that help?
 
  • #57
Indeed it helps!
Remember how roots can be written as exponents..
 
  • #58
[tex]\frac{7}{2}[/tex]

but how would i solve it normally?
 
Last edited:
  • #59
Indeed, that is what m equals, as soon as you get the LateX right..:smile:
 
  • #60
but say if i didn't know about binary how would i got about solving it
somthing to do with surds isn't it?
 
  • #61
In fact, perhaps your original post contained a typo. You went from
A = πr² + r²root(k²-1) to r³ = (2A/π+root(k²-1)
Did you really mean the r³, rather than r²?
 
  • #62
:redface: i believe your right
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top