Solving an equation with respect to y, where y is twice [hard]

  • Thread starter Science4ver
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Hard
In summary, the conversation is about solving the equation X(y)=0 with respect to y, where X(y)=y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2))-1/p). The conversation also discussed the use of a common denominator and the steps needed to isolate y in the equation. However, there were some algebraic mistakes made in the attempt to solve the equation, which led to incorrect solutions. The conversation concluded with a suggestion to review the steps and correct the mistakes in order to arrive at the correct solution for y.
  • #1
Science4ver
35
0

Homework Statement



Given the following equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

How would I go solving that equation X(y) = 0 with respect to y?


The Attempt at a Solution



I can choose a commen dominator called p*t*(b^2+y^2)

But I when end up with

((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = 0

How would you guys surgest I proceed from where in order to isolate y?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Science4ver said:

Homework Statement



Given the following equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

How would I go solving that equation X(y) = 0 with respect to y?


The Attempt at a Solution



I can choose a commen dominator called p*t*(b^2+y^2)

But I when end up with

((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = 0

How would you guys surgest I proceed from where in order to isolate y?

Now that you have it over a common denominator, if f(y)/g(y)=0, then f(y)=0.
 
  • #3
Dick said:
Now that you have it over a common denominator, if f(y)/g(y)=0, then f(y)=0.

Thank you for your answer.

That implies that I need to solve the equation

(y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2)) = 0

Which allows me to arrive at the solution (using my graphical calculator)

y = -b * p *(sqrt(-1/(p^2-1)

But solution is suppose to be:

y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1))

I can't quite comprehend which step I need to use arrive at that solution. But cause to the best of my knowledge there aren't any variables which I substitute in order to arrive at that solution.

Any idears?
 
  • #4
You aren't going to get there by being sloppy and relying on a calculator.

Science4ver said:
Thank you for your answer.

That implies that I need to solve the equation

(y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2)) = 0

There's an extra 'p' in that equation.

Science4ver said:
Which allows me to arrive at the solution (using my graphical calculator)

y = -b * p *(sqrt(-1/(p^2-1)

Extra 'p' here also, and what happened to the 't'? I think you should fix those up and figure out how your calculator found that expression before continuing.
 
  • #5
Dick said:
You aren't going to get there by being sloppy and relying on a calculator.



There's an extra 'p' in that equation.



Extra 'p' here also, and what happened to the 't'? I think you should fix those up and figure out how your calculator found that expression before continuing.

You are right. I see now the equation I am suppose to solve is y/(t*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))-1 = 0

Is it correct now?
 
  • #6
Science4ver said:
You are right. I see now the equation I am suppose to solve is y/(t*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))-1 = 0

Is it correct now?

No, the p is gone. Your first step of putting it over a common denominator is wrong. It happened when you expressed the term 1/p with that common denominator.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
So I am lost here :( What would you surgest I do as a first step with original equation? I can add 1/p on both sides I see that and next add the denominator on both sides. But what next?
 
  • #8
Science4ver said:
So I am lost here :( What would you surgest I do as a first step with original equation? I can add 1/p on both sides I see that and next add the denominator on both sides. But what next?

The strategy is to do what you were doing. Express X(y) over a common denominator. But do it right.
 
  • #9
Dick said:
The strategy is to do what you were doing. Express X(y) over a common denominator. But do it right.

I get that now but the only commen denominator I can deduce is my pee size brain is :)

p*t*(b^2+y^2))

But what I get from what you are saying is that denominator is wrong?
 
  • #10
Science4ver said:
I get that now but the only commen denominator I can deduce is my pee size brain is :)

p*t*(b^2+y^2))

But what I get from what you are saying is that denominator is wrong?

I would use p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) as a common denominator. Actually that's what I thought you were using and just forgetting the 'sqrt' part. If you have two fraction a/b-c/d you can always use c*d as a common denominator. What do you get expressing a/b-c/d over a common denominator?
 
  • #11
Dick said:
No. Denominator is fine. You got ((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) = 0. One of the terms in the numerator of that expression is wrong.

Okay, Glad I am not totally stupid then :)

So any if I take the original equation : y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

and use the commen denominator p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)

I arrive at

py/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) - (t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) =

y/(t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1 = 0 ?

But if that the right cause of action I still have y twice with the term y^2 and y, and no matter what I do I can't arrive at the result that

y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) :( So I understand I must be doing something wrong and there possibly a term which can be rewritten to arrive that the right result for y, but I can't see which one :(
 
  • #12
Science4ver said:
Okay, Glad I am not totally stupid then :)

So any if I take the original equation : y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

and use the commen denominator p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)

I arrive at

py/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) - (p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) =

y/(t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1 = 0 ?

But if that the right cause of action I still have y twice with the term y^2 and y, and no matter what I do I can't arrive at the result that

y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) :( So I understand I must be doing something wrong and there possibly a term which can be rewritten to arrive that the right result for y, but I can't see which one :(

Sorry, I've been assuming that some of the things you were writing were typos, when they are actually algebra mistakes. I revised the post you quoted. I'm asking you to show me how to put a/b-c/d over a common denominator.
 
  • #13
Science4ver said:
py/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) - (t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)/(p*t*sqrt(b^2+y^2) =

y/(t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1 = 0 ?
You confused me dropping the '0' at the end of the first of those two lines.
You have dropped a p in getting to the last line.
Don't collect everything over on the left like that. Leave it as py = (t*sqrt(b^2+y^2)).
You next step is to get rid of the square root. How can you do that?
 
  • #14
Dick said:
Sorry, I've been assuming that some of the things you were writing were typos, when they are actually algebra mistakes. I revised the post you quoted. I'm asking you to show me how to put a/b-c/d over a common denominator.

Thats easy a/b - c/d = ad/bd - bc/bd = (ad-bc)/bd

But regarding the other expression I attempted now 10 times if I take my equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p = 0

and use the commen denominator (p*t(b^2+y^2))

I end up with the expression:

py/(pt*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - (t(b^2+y^2))
/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = ?

I must have messed up somewhere :( ?
 
  • #15
Science4ver said:
Thats easy a/b - c/d = ad/bd - bc/bd = (ad-bc)/bd

But regarding the other expression I attempted now 10 times if I take my equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p = 0

and use the commen denominator (p*t(b^2+y^2))

I end up with the expression:

py/(pt*sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - (t(b^2+y^2))
/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = ?

I must have messed up somewhere :( ?

a/b-c/d=(ad-bc)/bd is correct. You are messing up the second part. Actually, looking at it, it's not messed up - but you don't have a common denominator. Just apply the correct pattern with a=y, b=t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)), c=1 and d=p.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Science4ver said:

Homework Statement



Given the following equation

X(y) = y/(t*(sqrt(b^2+y^2)) - 1/p

How would I go solving that equation X(y) = 0 with respect to y?


The Attempt at a Solution



I can choose a commen dominator called p*t*(b^2+y^2)

But I when end up with

((y*p - t*p*(sqrt(y^2+b^2))/(p*t(b^2+y^2)) = 0

How would you guys surgest I proceed from where in order to isolate y?

Your equation is
[tex] \frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}}-\frac{1}{p} = 0 \Rightarrow \frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}} = \frac{1}{p}[/tex]
Square both sides to get
[tex] \frac{y^2}{t^2(b^2+y^2)} = \frac{1}{p^2}[/tex]
Solve for ##y^2##; in other words, let ##y^2 = z## and solve for ##z## from the simple equation
[tex] \frac{z}{b^2 t^2 + t^2 z} = \frac{1}{p^2}[/tex]
 
  • #17
Yes, I know there is an easier way to attack this. You can also do it by putting everything over a common denominator and going from there. I was trying to diagose what was going so wrong with the OP's attempt to put things over a common denominator. Sometimes you have to do that. Here, it's optional.
 
  • #18
Ray Vickson said:
Your equation is
[tex] \frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}}-\frac{1}{p} = 0 \Rightarrow \frac{y}{t\sqrt{b^2+y^2}} = \frac{1}{p}[/tex]
Square both sides to get
[tex] \frac{y^2}{t^2(b^2+y^2)} = \frac{1}{p^2}[/tex]
Solve for ##y^2##; in other words, let ##y^2 = z## and solve for ##z## from the simple equation
[tex] \frac{z}{b^2 t^2 + t^2 z} = \frac{1}{p^2}[/tex]
thank and then I should be able to arrive at the solution ?
But if I solve the rewritten equation with respect to z I get z=-b^2*t^2/(t^2-p^2)?

I am no closer to y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) which is suppose to be the solution for original equation.

Which is still no closer to y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1))
 
Last edited:
  • #19
Science4ver said:
I get z=-b^2*t^2/(t^2-p^2)?

I am no closer to y = b/(sqrt(p/t +1) * sqrt(p/t-1)) which is suppose to be the solution for original equation.
Yes you are... almost there in fact. Just a little more juggling.
 
  • #20
haruspex said:
Yes you are... almost there in fact. Just a little more juggling.

I got it now :D
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Solving an equation with respect to y, where y is twice [hard]

How do you solve an equation with respect to y when y is twice a number?

To solve an equation with respect to y, where y is twice a number, you can follow the same steps as you would for any other equation. First, isolate the variable by using inverse operations. In this case, you will need to divide both sides of the equation by 2 to get y by itself. Then, you can solve for the number by substituting the value of y back into the equation.

What is the importance of solving an equation with respect to y?

Solving an equation with respect to y allows you to find the value of y for a given equation. This is helpful in many real-world applications, such as finding the height of an object or the temperature at a certain time. It also allows you to manipulate the equation to find different solutions or to solve for other variables.

Can you solve an equation with respect to y using only one step?

Yes, it is possible to solve an equation with respect to y using only one step if the equation is already in the form of y = a number. In this case, the value of y is already isolated and can be easily determined.

What if there are multiple variables in the equation when solving for y?

If there are multiple variables in the equation, you will need to use algebraic techniques to isolate the variable you are solving for. This may involve using the distributive property, combining like terms, or using inverse operations to move the other variables to the other side of the equation.

Are there any special cases when solving an equation with respect to y?

Yes, there are some special cases to keep in mind when solving an equation with respect to y. These include when the equation contains fractions, negative numbers, or variables with exponents. In these cases, you may need to use additional algebraic techniques and rules to properly isolate y and find the solution.

Back
Top