Solving Commutator Trouble with Interaction/Dirac Picture

  • Thread starter Ylle
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Commutator
In summary, the conversation discusses the equation of motion for an observable in the Interaction/Dirac picture, and how to commutate it with the Pauli matrices. The solution involves using the commutation relations between the Pauli matrices and the given hint to solve the problem in terms of spin matrices.
  • #1
Ylle
79
0

Homework Statement



Hi...
I'm having something about the Interaction/Dirac picture.
The equation of motion, for an observable [itex]A[/itex] that doesn't depend on time in the Schrödinger picture, is given by:

[tex]\[i\hbar \frac{d{{A}_{I}}}{dt}=\left[ {{A}_{I}},{{H}_{0}} \right]\][/tex]
where:

[tex]\[{{\hat{H}}_{0}}=\hbar \omega {{\hat{a}}^{\dagger }}\hat{a}+\frac{\hbar {{\omega }_{0}}{{{\hat{\sigma }}}_{z}}}{2}\][/tex]

From this I have to commutate with [itex]\[{{\hat{\sigma }}_{+}}\][/itex], [itex]\[{{\hat{\sigma }}_{-}}\][/itex] and [itex]\[{{\hat{\sigma }}_{z}}\][/itex], where [itex]\[{{\hat{\sigma }}_{z}}\][/itex] is the last of the Pauli matrices, and [itex]\[{{\hat{\sigma }}_{\pm }}=\frac{\left( {{{\hat{\sigma }}}_{x}}\pm i{{{\hat{\sigma }}}_{y}} \right)}{2}\][/itex].


Homework Equations



?

The Attempt at a Solution


Is it just as always ? By inserting, and then just take the normal commutator, and get:

[tex]
\begin{align}
& \left[ {{\sigma }_{z}},{{H}_{0}} \right]=...=0 \\
& \left[ {{\sigma }_{+}},{{H}_{0}} \right]=...=-\hbar {{\omega }_{0}}\left[ \begin{matrix}
0 & 1 \\
0 & 0 \\
\end{matrix} \right] \\
& \left[ {{\sigma }_{-}},{{H}_{0}} \right]=...=\hbar {{\omega }_{0}}\left[ \begin{matrix}
0 & 0 \\
1 & 0 \\
\end{matrix} \right] \\
\end{align}
[/tex]

Or am I way off ?
I'm kinda stuck, so a hint would be helpfull :)

Thanks in advance.


Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Are you supposed to answer it in terms of matrices. I haven't checked your answer but it can be simply done just by knowing the commutation relations between the pauli matrices.
 
  • #3
I think so...
There is given a hint that I should look how to commutate the spin matrices, where fx. [Sx, Sy] = ihSz (i = complex number, h = h-bar) - if I remember correctly.
 
  • #4
You can use that commutation you just wrote out, along with the permutations of it to solve the problem in terms of spin matrices alone.
 
  • #5
,

As a scientist, it is important to approach problems with a logical and analytical mindset. In this case, it seems like you are on the right track by using the commutator to solve for the equations of motion. However, it would be helpful if you provided more context or background information about the problem you are trying to solve. This will allow for a more thorough and accurate response. Additionally, it may be useful to provide any relevant equations or attempts at solving the problem so far. Overall, it is important to provide as much information as possible in order to receive the most helpful and accurate response.
 

FAQ: Solving Commutator Trouble with Interaction/Dirac Picture

What is commutator trouble and how does it relate to the interaction/Dirac picture?

Commutator trouble refers to the difficulty in finding a consistent way to apply quantum mechanics to systems with time-dependent interactions. This is where the interaction/Dirac picture comes in, as it provides a framework for solving these problems by separating the time-evolution of a system from the operators that describe it.

What is the difference between the interaction picture and the Dirac picture?

In the interaction picture, the Hamiltonian is split into two parts: the free Hamiltonian and the interaction Hamiltonian. The time-evolution of a system is then described by the free Hamiltonian, while the operators are described by the interaction Hamiltonian. In the Dirac picture, both the operators and the time-evolution are described by the free Hamiltonian.

Why is the interaction/Dirac picture useful in solving commutator trouble?

The interaction/Dirac picture allows for a separation of time-dependent interactions from the operators, making it easier to apply quantum mechanics to systems with time-dependent interactions. This helps to avoid inconsistencies and allows for more accurate calculations in these types of systems.

What are some common examples of systems where commutator trouble arises?

Some common examples include systems with time-dependent potentials, systems with time-dependent external forces, and systems with time-dependent Hamiltonians in general. These can include particles in an electric or magnetic field, atoms interacting with light, and quantum systems undergoing chemical reactions.

Are there any limitations to using the interaction/Dirac picture to solve commutator trouble?

While the interaction/Dirac picture is a useful tool, it does have limitations. It is not always applicable to systems with strong or highly non-linear interactions, and it may not be the most efficient method for solving certain types of problems. Additionally, it may not be applicable in cases where the time-dependence is not easily separable from the rest of the system.

Back
Top