Solving Complex Fraction: Hint for Rule to Follow

In summary, the conversation is about solving a complex fraction problem using different methods. The book's answer is -\frac{3x+2}{x-2} and the student's attempts include using the advice to multiply the top and bottom of the fraction by its complex conjugate and to put in grouping symbols before simplifying. The student's final answer is \frac{-3x+2}{x-2}, which is incorrect.
  • #1
Raizy
107
0

Homework Statement



I am just looking for a hint on which rule to follow first; what would you tell me if I already know how to deal with an ordinary complex fraction?

I tried using x (and multiplied everything) as the LCD and got the wrong answer.

[tex] 3 - \frac {2}{1-\frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{x}}} [/tex]


If it's hard to see the bottom part, it is:

[tex]{1-\frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{x}}} [/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Is x complex? Why don't we call it z; then z=x+iy?


[tex] 3 - \frac {2}{1-\frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{z}}} [/tex]


Multiply the top and bottom of z/2 by the complex conjugate of z.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


Phrak said:
Is x complex? Why don't we call it z; then z=x+iy?

Multiply the top and bottom of z/2 by the complex conjugate of z.

I don't think x is a complex number. I'm pretty sure that he is just supposed to simplify this expression as much as possible, these types of embedded fractions are often called a complex fraction, even though it has nothing to do with complex numbers

Raizy said:
I tried using x (and multiplied everything) as the LCD and got the wrong answer.

Why don't you show us what you tried, and why you think it is the wrong answer...
 
  • #4


gabbagabbahey said:
I don't think x is a complex number. I'm pretty sure that he is just supposed to simplify this expression as much as possible, these types of embedded fractions are often called a complex fraction, even though it has nothing to do with complex numbers.

Yeah. I hadn't thought of that... It is rather complex as fractions go.
 
  • #5


Raizy said:

Homework Statement



I am just looking for a hint on which rule to follow first; what would you tell me if I already know how to deal with an ordinary complex fraction?

I tried using x (and multiplied everything) as the LCD and got the wrong answer.

[tex] 3 - \frac {2}{1-\frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{x}}} [/tex]


If it's hard to see the bottom part, it is:

[tex]{1-\frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{x}}} [/tex]

First step: multiply both numerator and denominator of that fraction:
[tex]\frac{2x}{(3- \frac{2}{x})x}= \frac{2x}{3x- 2}[/tex]
Now subtract:
[tex]1- \frac{2x}{3x-1}[/itex]
and continue.
 
  • #6


To OP, did you mean to say "compound fraction"?

I find it helps to put in the grouping symbols implicit in the bar fraction notation and then work from the inside out:

[tex] 3 - \frac{2}{1 - \frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{x}}}[/tex]
[tex] 3 - \frac{2}{\left(1 -\frac{2}{\left(3-\frac{2}{x}\right)}\right)}[/tex]

Now simplify:
[tex]3 - \frac{2}{x} = \frac{3x - 2}{x}[/tex]
[tex] 3 - \frac{2}{\left(1 - \frac{2}{\frac{3x-2}{x}\right)}\right)}=3 - \frac{2}{\left(1 -\frac{2x}{3x-2}\right)}\right)}[/tex]

and so on...
 
  • #7


Thanks all for the advice. I tried both Jambaugh's advice and HallsofIvy's. I preferred Halls method since it skips a step :wink: Okay... so, in BEDMAS, when they say deal with brackets from innermost first, does this mean the same thing for fraction bars? Fraction bars are classified as a type of bracket? :confused:

The original expression I had to simplify:

[tex]3-\frac {2}{1-\frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{x}}[/tex]

The book's answer is: [tex]-\frac{3x+2}{x-2}[/tex]

Attempt #1 (Jambaugh's advice):


=[tex]
3 - \frac{2}{1 -\frac{2}{\left(3-\frac{2}{x}\right)}\right)}
[/tex]

=[tex]
3 - \frac{2}{\left(1 - \frac{2}{\frac{3x-2}{x}\right)}\right)}=3 - \frac{2}{\left(1 -\frac{2x}{3x-2}\right)}\right)}
[/tex]

=[tex]3-\frac{6x-4}{3x-2-2x}=3-\frac{6x-4}{x-2}[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{3x-6-6x+4}{x-2}[/tex]

My final answer: = [tex]\frac{-3x-2}{x-2}[/tex]
Now this is probably equivalent to: [tex]
-\frac{3x+2}{x-2}
[/tex] ... but I am still wondering why that makes sense...Attempt #2: HallsofIvy's advice:

[tex]3-\frac{2}{1-\left(\frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{x}}}\right)[/tex]
=[tex]3-\frac{2}{1-\frac{2x}{3x-2}}=3-\frac{6x-4}{3x-2-2x}[/tex]

My final answer: [tex]\frac{-3x-2}{x-2}[/tex]

Here is my original attempt, I missed some steps, as follows:

=[tex]3-\frac{2}{1-\frac{2}{3x-2}}=3-\frac{6x-4}{3x-2-2}=3-\frac{6x-4}{3x-4}[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{9x-12-6x+4}{3x-4}=\frac{3x-8}{3x-4}[/tex]

There were a few other attempts, all which were wrong. My mind was all over the place; very unorganized, very confusing, very frustrating... :frown:
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Hi Raizy! :smile:
Raizy said:
Okay... so, in BEDMAS, when they say deal with brackets from innermost first, does this mean the same thing for fraction bars? Fraction bars are classified as a type of bracket? :confused:

Yes, when you have a fraction, imagine it's all on one line, like (a + b)/(c - d), so you have to put brackets round the numerator or denominator :smile:

for more detail, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BODMAS#Proper_use_of_parentheses_and_other_grouping_symbols :wink:
 
  • #9


Raizy said:
Thanks all for the advice. I tried both Jambaugh's advice and HallsofIvy's. I preferred Halls method since it skips a step :wink: Okay... so, in BEDMAS, when they say deal with brackets from innermost first, does this mean the same thing for fraction bars? Fraction bars are classified as a type of bracket? :confused:

The original expression I had to simplify:

[tex]3-\frac {2}{1-\frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{x}}[/tex]

The book's answer is: [tex]-\frac{3x+2}{x-2}[/tex]

Attempt #1 (Jambaugh's advice):


=[tex]
3 - \frac{2}{1 -\frac{2}{\left(3-\frac{2}{x}\right)}\right)}
[/tex]

=[tex]
3 - \frac{2}{\left(1 - \frac{2}{\frac{3x-2}{x}\right)}\right)}=3 - \frac{2}{\left(1 -\frac{2x}{3x-2}\right)}\right)}
[/tex]

=[tex]3-\frac{6x-4}{3x-2-2x}=3-\frac{6x-4}{x-2}[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{3x-6-6x+4}{x-2}[/tex]

My final answer: = [tex]\frac{-3x-2}{x-2}[/tex]
Now this is probably equivalent to: [tex]
-\frac{3x+2}{x-2}
[/tex] ... but I am still wondering why that makes sense...
The two results above are equal. The numerator of your answer is -3x - 2. That is equal to -(3x + 2). If you have a rational expression with a negative sign, the sign can appear in the numerator, or the denomintor, or to the front of the fraction. For example, -1/2 = 1/(-2) = -(1/2).
Raizy said:
Attempt #2: HallsofIvy's advice:

[tex]3-\frac{2}{1-\left(\frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{x}}}\right)[/tex]
=[tex]3-\frac{2}{1-\frac{2x}{3x-2}}=3-\frac{6x-4}{3x-2-2x}[/tex]

My final answer: [tex]\frac{-3x+2}{x-2}[/tex]
You did something wrong. This answer is not equal to the one you got before, which was the same as the book's answer.
Raizy said:
Here is my original attempt, I missed some steps, as follows:

=[tex]3-\frac{2}{1-\frac{2}{3x-2}}=3-\frac{6x-4}{3x-2-2}=3-\frac{6x-4}{3x-4}[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{9x-12-6x+4}{3x-4}=\frac{3x-8}{3x-4}[/tex]
This is looks way off.
Raizy said:
There were a few other attempts, all which were wrong. My mind was all over the place; very unorganized, very confusing, very frustrating... :frown:
 
  • #10


Raizy said:
Here is my original attempt, I missed some steps, as follows:

=[tex]3-\frac{2}{1-\frac{2}{3x-2}}=3-\frac{6x-4}{3x-2-2}=3-\frac{6x-4}{3x-4}[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{9x-12-6x+4}{3x-4}=\frac{3x-8}{3x-4}[/tex]

There were a few other attempts, all which were wrong. My mind was all over the place; very unorganized, very confusing, very frustrating... :frown:

Everything was right except for the first line.

[tex] 3 - \frac {2}{1-\frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{x}}} \neq 3-\frac{2}{1-\frac{2}{3x-2}}[/tex]

Focusing strictly on that smallest fraction part:

[tex]\frac{2}{3-\frac{2}{x}} = \frac{2}{\left( \frac{3x-2}{x}\right )} =\frac{2x}{3x-2}[/tex]

You have been able to follow these steps correctly for all the other fractions, so I think you just made a little slip-up there.
 
  • #11


Mark44 said:
You did something wrong. This answer is not equal to the one you got before, which was the same as the book's answer.

Ahh, for attempt number 2 I just realized that, it was a copying error. I've edited it so I guess the answer is equivalently right.

I've been practicing these "compound" fractions for about 2 days now. I bet I'll forget everything I did by tomorrow, even if I practice before sleeping. lol. There is just so many details going on in my head it's as if they keep slipping through.

*sigh*... how long until my brain puts this off into long-term memory :frown:
 
  • #12


Raizy said:
*sigh*... how long until my brain puts this off into long-term memory :frown:

How about trying a different approach? Rather than just answering more of these problems, take a step back and work with more simple fractions. Once you understand the concept of how to work with them and manipulate them with relative ease, move your way up the ladder.
Better this way than taking multiple stabs in the dark.

The fractions all work the same way, and these compound fractions are just like simplifying 2+ fractions one after the other in the same problem.


Maybe I'll get you started if you like:

Say you are given the fraction: [tex]a-\frac{b+c}{d}[/tex] and asked to simplify it as much as possible.

Find a lowest common denominator (LCD) between the 2 'fractions'.

This would be 'd' so the part of the fraction 'a' needs to be manipulated to have a denominator of d, without changing the fraction. In other words, multiply both numerator and denominator by d.

[tex]\frac{ad}{d}-\frac{b+c}{d}[/tex]

Now since the 2 fractions have the same denominator, their numerators can be added together:

[tex]\frac{ad-(b+c)}{d}[/tex]

now simplify by expanding: [tex]\frac{ad-b-c}{d}[/tex] and this is the simplest it can be.

If this were a part of a compound fraction, well then now we can move onto the larger outside fraction. such as:

[tex]\frac{e}{a-\frac{b+c}{d}} = \frac{e}{\left(\frac{ad-b-c}{d}\right)}[/tex]

A fraction on a fraction can of course be simplified. Multiply both numerator and denominator by the denominator in the smaller fraction:

[tex]\frac{d(e)}{d\left(\frac{ad-b-c}{d}\right)}[/tex]

simplify: [tex]\frac{de}{ad-b-c}[/tex]

and keep following this process (or any other you choose) for the entire compound fraction.
 
  • #13


Thanks Mentallic for that quick lesson. That was a nice review this afternoon:cool: I can manage those simpler ones no problem. I guess my problem was realizing I had to deal with the inner most fraction group and work my way outward if there was a bunch of fractions clumped up.
 

FAQ: Solving Complex Fraction: Hint for Rule to Follow

What is the rule to follow when solving complex fractions?

The rule to follow when solving complex fractions is to first simplify the numerator and denominator by factoring out common factors and then dividing out any common factors. Once the fractions are simplified, the complex fraction can be solved by multiplying the numerator and denominator by the reciprocal of the fraction in the denominator.

How do I simplify the numerator and denominator of a complex fraction?

To simplify the numerator and denominator of a complex fraction, you should factor out any common factors. This can include factoring out a greatest common factor or using the distributive property to factor out a common term. Once the common factors have been factored out, you can then divide out any common factors between the numerator and denominator.

Can I solve a complex fraction without simplifying first?

No, it is important to simplify the numerator and denominator of a complex fraction before attempting to solve it. This ensures that the final answer is in its simplest form and avoids any potential errors in the calculation.

How do I determine the reciprocal of a fraction?

The reciprocal of a fraction is found by flipping the fraction upside down. For example, the reciprocal of 2/3 would be 3/2. In the context of solving complex fractions, multiplying by the reciprocal of the fraction in the denominator is a helpful step in simplifying the overall fraction.

Can complex fractions be solved using a calculator?

Yes, complex fractions can be solved using a calculator. However, it is important to note that most calculators will not show the steps involved in solving the complex fraction, so it is important to understand the rule for solving them manually in order to verify the calculator's answer.

Back
Top