- #1
Daniiel
- 123
- 0
Hey,
Got stuck studying complex stuff again, I am trying to find out how i can get rid of the isin2bx in my result, here is the question
[PLAIN]http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/3199/unledkcv.jpg
The integral of e^(-z^2) = 0 as C is a closed curve and e^(-z^2) is analytic
So first parametrizing the rectagle, letting the right side by C1, top C2, then C3, C4, where the paths C2 and C4 are longer.
So for C1
p(t) = R+it, for 0<=t<=b, then d(p(t)/dt =i
so its integral betweel b and 0 e^-(R+it)^2 idt = blah (expand the power) which tends to 0 as R tends to infinity.
and so on for each path
Adding each path together i get
sqrt(Pi) - 2e^(-b^2) int(between zero and R) e^(-x^2) (cos(2bx)-isin(2bx)) = 0
so (sqrt(pi)e^(b^2))/2 = int(between zero and R) e^(-x^2) (cos(2bx)-isin(2bx)), let R tend to infinity
Im trying to work out how can i get rid of the isin(2bx)?
I'm also not sure what it means by "Why is the answer sensible" what do you guys think it means?
Thanks in advanced
[itex] [/itex]
Got stuck studying complex stuff again, I am trying to find out how i can get rid of the isin2bx in my result, here is the question
[PLAIN]http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/3199/unledkcv.jpg
The integral of e^(-z^2) = 0 as C is a closed curve and e^(-z^2) is analytic
So first parametrizing the rectagle, letting the right side by C1, top C2, then C3, C4, where the paths C2 and C4 are longer.
So for C1
p(t) = R+it, for 0<=t<=b, then d(p(t)/dt =i
so its integral betweel b and 0 e^-(R+it)^2 idt = blah (expand the power) which tends to 0 as R tends to infinity.
and so on for each path
Adding each path together i get
sqrt(Pi) - 2e^(-b^2) int(between zero and R) e^(-x^2) (cos(2bx)-isin(2bx)) = 0
so (sqrt(pi)e^(b^2))/2 = int(between zero and R) e^(-x^2) (cos(2bx)-isin(2bx)), let R tend to infinity
Im trying to work out how can i get rid of the isin(2bx)?
I'm also not sure what it means by "Why is the answer sensible" what do you guys think it means?
Thanks in advanced
[itex] [/itex]
Last edited by a moderator: