Solving $\displaystyle \lim_{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{ab^x+ba^x}{x-1}$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sleek
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The limit in question, $\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{ab^x+ba^x}{x-1}$, leads to confusion regarding its evaluation. The numerator approaches $2ab$ as $x$ approaches 1, while the denominator approaches 0, suggesting the limit may not exist. If either $a$ or $b$ is zero, the limit simplifies to 0. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in the problem statement, as the limit's behavior can vary significantly based on the values of $a$ and $b$. Overall, the limit's existence and value depend on the specific conditions of the variables involved.
Sleek
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



\displaystyle \lim_{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{ab^x+ba^x}{x-1}

Homework Equations



-

The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt was to let x-1 = u

As x -> 1, x-1 -> 0, therefore as x-> 1, u -> 0.

So I obtained something which looked simple.

\displaystyle ab \lim_{u \rightarrow 0} \frac{a^u + b^u}{u}

Had it been a^u-b^u, Adding and subtracting 1 and splitting the expression into (a^u-1)/u and (b^u-1)/u would help solve the limit, which is loga+logb. Thus the answer becomes ab log(ab).

But since there is a plus sign, I'm confused on what I could do further. Incidentally, th answer to the question is ab log(b/a), which is quite close to the previous one, and does imply a sign change between the log expressions.

Can anyone verify my substitution and just give a subtle hint towards the direction I have to look? Also, is there a place where I can find proofs of standard forms like lim(x -> 0) (a^x-1)/x = ln a etc.?

Thanks,
Sleek.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The numerator goes to 2ab. If either a or b is 0, the numerator is identically 0 (for positive x, in particular for x near 1) so the limit is 0. Otherwise, 2ab is finite non-zero whereas the denominator goes to positive infinity as x goes to 1 from the right and negative infinity from the other direction, meaning the limit doesn't exist. Perhaps you wrote the problem out wrong?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K