- #1
gnnmartin
- 83
- 5
- TL;DR Summary
- In 15.43 he implies dα ∧ β = β ∧ dα where α,β are one forms.
I expected dα ∧ β = −β ∧ dα. Am I misreading the text, or have I simply lost the plot?
The equality is implied in the move from equation 15.43 line 2 to line 3.
I do find Dray's book is admirably clear and absolutely says something I wish to understand, but my 78 year old brain has difficulty. However, in this case I can be precise about where I fail to follow.
Oh! I find after all, writing this has enabled me to see my mistake, but I'll post the question all the same so that some kind person can confirm where I went wrong. If α is a one form, dα is a two form, so dα ∧ β = −−β ∧ dα = β ∧ dα.
I do find Dray's book is admirably clear and absolutely says something I wish to understand, but my 78 year old brain has difficulty. However, in this case I can be precise about where I fail to follow.
Oh! I find after all, writing this has enabled me to see my mistake, but I'll post the question all the same so that some kind person can confirm where I went wrong. If α is a one form, dα is a two form, so dα ∧ β = −−β ∧ dα = β ∧ dα.