Solving for a variable inside the error function?

In summary, the error function in excel can be solved using the inverse error function, which can be found in mathematical handbooks or solved using excel's solver tool.
  • #1
channel1
73
0
i need to solve for a variable inside the error function on excel, is there an opposite function i can use to accomplish this?
example: y = sqrt(x-t) -> x = t+y^2
except instead of a sqrt( ) I have erf( )

**this is not a math class so I don't have to get into breaking it down into the integration, I'm just looking for a way to quickly rearrange the equation in excel (I'm posting this here because I've only come into contact with the error function in physics classes where we DID use the integration/taylor series)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
channel1 said:
i need to solve for a variable inside the error function on excel, is there an opposite function i can use to accomplish this?
example: y = sqrt(x-t) -> x = t+y^2
except instead of a sqrt( ) I have erf( )

**this is not a math class so I don't have to get into breaking it down into the integration, I'm just looking for a way to quickly rearrange the equation in excel (I'm posting this here because I've only come into contact with the error function in physics classes where we DID use the integration/taylor series)
There is an inverse, denoted erf-1, but it won't be that simple to use, as it's typically given as a Maclaurin series. See this wiki article.
 
  • #3
Depending on the context you could use excel solver to do this
 
  • #4
Mark44 said:
There is an inverse, denoted erf-1, but it won't be that simple to use, as it's typically given as a Maclaurin series. See this wiki article.

does erf^-1(erf(function)) = function?
 
  • #5
^ wolframalpha says yes, I think this may solve everything, thanks!
 
  • #6
damn, excel doesn't recognize the inverse error function, is there a way around that?
 
  • #7
channel1 said:
i need to solve for a variable inside the error function on excel, is there an opposite function i can use to accomplish this?
example: y = sqrt(x-t) -> x = t+y^2
except instead of a sqrt( ) I have erf( )

**this is not a math class so I don't have to get into breaking it down into the integration, I'm just looking for a way to quickly rearrange the equation in excel (I'm posting this here because I've only come into contact with the error function in physics classes where we DID use the integration/taylor series)

As others have indicated, you can use the EXCEL Solver tool. Alternatively, you can consult handbooks of mathematical functions and find approximate formulas for erf^(-1) of various degrees of accuracy, then program these into your calculator/computer.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Solving for a variable inside the error function?

1) What is the error function?

The error function, also known as the Gauss error function, is a mathematical function used to calculate the probability of a normally distributed random variable falling within a certain range of values.

2) Why is it important to solve for a variable inside the error function?

Solving for a variable inside the error function allows us to determine the probability of a certain value occurring in a normal distribution. This is useful in various fields such as statistics, physics, and engineering.

3) How do you solve for a variable inside the error function?

The error function can be solved using various methods such as numerical approximations, series expansions, or specialized algorithms. The specific method used will depend on the complexity of the problem and the desired level of accuracy.

4) What are some real-world applications of solving for a variable inside the error function?

The error function is commonly used in fields such as finance, risk management, and quality control to determine the probability of certain events occurring. It is also used in signal processing and communication systems to calculate the error rates of transmitted signals.

5) Are there any limitations to using the error function to solve for a variable?

The error function assumes a normal distribution, so it may not accurately represent data that is not normally distributed. Additionally, it may not be suitable for highly complex or multi-dimensional problems. In these cases, alternative methods may need to be used.

Similar threads

Back
Top