Solving for Exact Fit Cubic Polynomial Parameters

In summary, the problem is that you cannot have all four coefficients a,b,c,d integer at the same time. You need to find a way to solve for d so you can fit a general cubic polynomial.
  • #1
ShaunDiel
23
0

Homework Statement


4ig5sl.jpg



The Attempt at a Solution


For Part A) I did the normal best fit straight line stuff, A^τAX=bA^τ etc, resulting in:
y= 31/26x -8/3

Now part B) is where I need a hand, I started with just cubing, squaring etc the terms given and doing row ops, which is where I'm at now. It just seems like it's getting too ugly and I'm not sure where I'm going with it.

4g6gdc.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The problem is that you have only three data points, but need 4 points to fit a general cubic. I have not checked your working above in detail, but you end up with the conditions -10c + 2d = 3, or c = (1/5)d-(3/10) = 0.2d - 0.3. Then -3b + 8c 6d = -124, so you can get b in terms of d, etc. Altogether, you will have one free parameter, d, in your fit, and the question is asking why you cannot have all four coefficients a,b,c,d integer at the same time.

RGV
 
  • #3
Ray Vickson said:
The problem is that you have only three data points, but need 4 points to fit a general cubic. I have not checked your working above in detail, but you end up with the conditions -10c + 2d = 3, or c = (1/5)d-(3/10) = 0.2d - 0.3. Then -3b + 8c 6d = -124, so you can get b in terms of d, etc. Altogether, you will have one free parameter, d, in your fit, and the question is asking why you cannot have all four coefficients a,b,c,d integer at the same time.

RGV


I still don't really understand where I'm supposed to go :confused:

I have legitimately no idea
 
  • #4
I emailed my prof about the question, asking him if the final cubic:

( (11/8+1019/16)x^3 + x^2 + (8/3+123/3)x+(-5-3/2)=0)

Was as incorrect as it looked.

He replied with this:

"You should get a row of zeros in your equation, giving you a homogeneous solution which is a cubic polynomial and a particular solution which can be either cubic or quadratic. Your homogeneous solution should have a certain factorised form which you should expect."
 
  • #5
Go back and read the problem again! It says "What is the general equation of all cubic polynomials". As Ray Vickson told you, the general cubic involves 4 coefficients- [itex]y= ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+ d[/itex]- while you have only three conditions to satisfy. You can use the three equations you get by putting the three values of x and y into that equation into solve for any three of a, b, c, and d in terms of the fourth. Different values of that fourth coefficient will give different cubic polynomials out of the infinite number that satisfy that.
 
  • #6
HallsofIvy said:
Go back and read the problem again! It says "What is the general equation of all cubic polynomials". As Ray Vickson told you, the general cubic involves 4 coefficients- [itex]y= ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+ d[/itex]- while you have only three conditions to satisfy. You can use the three equations you get by putting the three values of x and y into that equation into solve for any three of a, b, c, and d in terms of the fourth. Different values of that fourth coefficient will give different cubic polynomials out of the infinite number that satisfy that.

Right, I understand that much, I just feel like I'm taking the wrong approach completely to starting this.

I'm completely screwed now since nothing I did was right
 
  • #7
The final row in your next to last matrix in post 1 (I don't believe your final step accomplishes anything) is equivalent to -10c- 2d= 3 which is equivalent to 2d= -3- 10c and gives d= (-3/2)- 5c. The second row is equivalent to -3b+ 8c= -124 which is equivalent to 3b= 8c- 124 and so b= (8/3)c+ 124/3. The first row is equivalent to 24a- 20c+ 3d= -514. Putting the previous values into that, 24a- 20((8/3)c- 124/3)+ 3((-3/2)- 5c)= -514. Solve that for a so you have a, b, and c in terms of d. Finally write [itex]y= ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+ d[/itex] using those so you have the "general" cubic polynomial in terms of the parameter d.
 
  • #8
HallsofIvy said:
The final row in your next to last matrix in post 1 (I don't believe your final step accomplishes anything) is equivalent to -10c- 2d= 3 which is equivalent to 2d= -3- 10c and gives d= (-3/2)- 5c. The second row is equivalent to -3b+ 8c= -124 which is equivalent to 3b= 8c- 124 and so b= (8/3)c+ 124/3. The first row is equivalent to 24a- 20c+ 3d= -514. Putting the previous values into that, 24a- 20((8/3)c- 124/3)+ 3((-3/2)- 5c)= -514. Solve that for a so you have a, b, and c in terms of d. Finally write [itex]y= ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+ d[/itex] using those so you have the "general" cubic polynomial in terms of the parameter d.


Okay sweet, I'm working this out now, I think you skimmed over the stuff that I worked out because I did a column swap so basically everywhere you have a c it should be a b.

But where I am right now, I have:

d=(-3/2)-5b
c=(8/3)b+124/3
b=(-3/10)-(1/5)d

So If I plug them into the first row I'll have 24a-20((-3/10)-(1/5)d)) +3((-3/2)-5b)?

What did my prof mean about the row of zeros? That's making me think I messed up my row ops somwhere
 

FAQ: Solving for Exact Fit Cubic Polynomial Parameters

What is "Exact Fit General Cubic"?

"Exact Fit General Cubic" is a mathematical model used to describe the behavior of a cubic solid under stress and strain. It takes into account the exact fit of the atoms within the solid and allows for the calculation of properties such as elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, and yield strength.

How does "Exact Fit General Cubic" differ from other models?

Unlike other models, "Exact Fit General Cubic" takes into account the exact fit of the atoms within the solid, rather than assuming a perfect lattice structure. This allows for a more accurate representation of the real-world behavior of cubic solids.

What are the limitations of "Exact Fit General Cubic"?

One limitation of "Exact Fit General Cubic" is that it only applies to cubic solids and cannot be used for other crystal structures. Additionally, it assumes that the atoms within the solid are perfectly spherical, which may not always be the case.

How is "Exact Fit General Cubic" used in materials science?

"Exact Fit General Cubic" is used in materials science to predict the mechanical properties of cubic solids, such as their response to stress and strain. It is also used in the design and development of new materials with desired properties.

Can "Exact Fit General Cubic" be applied to all types of cubic solids?

While "Exact Fit General Cubic" is most commonly used for metals and alloys, it can also be applied to other types of cubic solids such as ceramics and polymers. However, the model may need to be modified to account for the specific properties of these materials.

Similar threads

Back
Top