Solving for Force with Hooke's Law: What Am I Doing Wrong?

AI Thread Summary
A spring with a spring constant of k=45 N/m is initially stretched to 0.35m by a 1.0 kg mass, but the correct length of the spring when the mass is removed is 0.13m. The user struggles to reconcile the calculations using Hooke's Law, F = -kx, and is confused by the force values derived from the spring's stretch. They calculate the force for both lengths but find discrepancies when comparing to the expected mass of 1.0 kg. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between force, spring constant, and displacement in applying Hooke's Law correctly. Ultimately, the user receives clarification on the calculations needed to resolve their confusion.
catch.yossarian
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
A spring with k=45 N/m is .35m when pulled
down with a 1.0 kg mass, what is the length of the
spring when the mass is taken off? The answer in the
back of the book is .13m (13 cm), I can't for the life
of me figure out how they get that.

I know that Hooke's Law is: F = -kx

What I've done so far:

F = (45)(.35) = 15.75 ---> Force it takes to pull down .35 meters, apparently using 1.0kg. Thus, if I divide 15.75 by 9.81, I should get 1.0kg, yes?

15.75 / 9.81 = 1.60 ---> :bugeye:

I must be doing something wrong, let's start backwards.

F = (45)(.13) = 5.85 --> Force it takes to pull down .13 meters (this x is the answer, but right now I'm trying to find a proper F). 5.85 / 9.81 = .56, again, not 1.0kg. :(

What am I doing wrong? Can anybody point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the spring without the mass.It has the length x_{0}.When acted by a force,its length is x.Hooke's law says that the magnitude of the force is proportional to the the length the spring is stretched under the influence of the force:
F_{el}=k\Delta x=k(x-x_{0})

Compute the force and \Delta x,then use the expression for the latter to solve your problem.

Daniel.
 
Got it, thanks!

Man, such a small thing, too.
*sigh of relief*
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top