Solving for Unknown Variables (r0q)(1) and (q0r)(1) in a Complex Equation

  • Thread starter nate1936
  • Start date
In summary, the community involved in this board is not helpful in solving homework problems. They are instead side tracking the user and telling them what they already know.
  • #1
nate1936
5
0

Homework Statement


This problem is giving me issues, mainly because of how it is set up.


Homework Equations


Here is a picture of what my problem is,
http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/1723/heko.png


The Attempt at a Solution


I am attempting to solve this problem, and I haven't encountered anything like it in the book so far, I'm assuming I take the variables "q of x" and "r of x", but when solving, why are they swapped around? Is the (r0q)(1)= and (q0r)(1)= representing multiplication? I haven't seen that raised circle in the middle before. I'm assuming it has something to do with logarithms? I don't need anyone to show me how this particular problem is solved, [that would be cheating though it doesn't really matter to much in this class, 90% of the grade is based on the test]

If someone could change the variables and numbers, and/or just go through the steps on how I should go about solving this type of problem, I would really appreciate it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well this is the composition of functions, which is not commutative. That mean qor (using o as the symbol of composition for lack of a better button) does not necessarily equal roq.

Do you know how to find q of r, ignoring the 1 for now?
 
  • #3
The crucial point is, do you know the definition of "[itex]f\circ g(x)[/itex]"? This is known as the "composition of functions". If this is the first course in which you have seen it, I'll bet there's a definition in the same section of the book in which the problem occurs!
 
  • #4
Thank you for your help so far, because I now know it is a "Composition of functions" problem I was able to find out how to get started with this I think.
r o q (1) can be re-written as (r(q(1)) from here, can I have a hint as to what the next step is?
If the (1) were an x I would substitute in the variables and solve for x, however I'm not sure what to do with the (1)
 
  • #5
You can find q(1) first and then use that in r(x), or you can first find q of r as if you only had an x, and then substitute the 1 in the final step. Try both, you should get the same answer both times.
 
  • #6
Is there a special function you are talking about when you say find q(1) [in the first way to solve it you have posted] or are you just multiplying the q (x) variable times one?

Sorry for my stupid questions, I have to figure this out somehow though!
 
  • #7
nate1936 said:
Is there a special function you are talking about when you say find q(1) [in the first way to solve it you have posted] or are you just multiplying the q (x) variable times one?

Sorry for my stupid questions, I have to figure this out somehow though!

To find q(1), substitute 1 in for the x that is given in the definition of q(x).

[itex]q(x)=x^2+3[/itex]
 
  • #8
edit: nevermind I found a forum with much more straightforward answers. Thanks anyway
 
  • #9
Did you find a forum that will take your tests for you? Getting the answer to homework problems from others, rather than working them out for yourself is a sure way to fail a course.
 
  • #10
Actually I found a forum that instead of side tracking and telling me what I already know, actually showed me an example problem, and showed me the steps required to solve this type of problem. I learn in a different way than the community involved on this board apparently. Sorry if that offends you.
 

FAQ: Solving for Unknown Variables (r0q)(1) and (q0r)(1) in a Complex Equation

How do I solve for unknown variables in a complex equation?

To solve for unknown variables in a complex equation, you can use algebraic techniques such as combining like terms, distributing, and isolating the variable on one side of the equation. It may also be helpful to use properties of equality and inverse operations.

What is the importance of solving for unknown variables in a complex equation?

Solving for unknown variables in a complex equation allows us to find the specific values of variables that satisfy the equation. This can help us understand and analyze the relationship between different variables in the equation and make predictions or solve real-world problems.

Can you provide an example of solving for unknown variables in a complex equation?

Sure! Let's say we have the equation 2x + 5 = 17. To solve for x, we first subtract 5 from both sides to isolate the variable. This gives us 2x = 12. Then, we divide both sides by 2 to get x = 6. So the unknown variable, x, has a value of 6 that satisfies the equation.

Are there any tips for solving complex equations with multiple unknown variables?

One tip is to start by rearranging the equation and combining like terms to simplify it. Then, choose one variable to isolate and solve for first. Once you have the value for that variable, you can substitute it into the remaining equations to solve for the other variables. It can also be helpful to check your solutions by plugging them back into the original equation.

Is there a specific order to follow when solving for unknown variables in a complex equation?

There is no specific order that you must follow, but it is generally recommended to start with the simplest equation or variable and work your way up to more complex ones. It can also be helpful to use parentheses and follow the order of operations (PEMDAS) to avoid any potential errors.

Back
Top