Solving for Values in an Inverse Partitioned Matrix

In summary, the partitioned matrices A and A^-1 are given, and the task is to solve for the matrices Z, X, and Y. By equating the product of A and A^-1 to a partitioned identity matrix, and multiplying out the entries and comparing them to the expected corresponding entries in the identity matrix, it is determined that Z=-C, X=BC-A, and Y=-B.
  • #1
BraedenP
96
0

Homework Statement


Given partitioned matrices:
[tex]A=\begin{bmatrix}
I & 0 & 0\\
C & 0 & 0\\
A & B & I
\end{bmatrix}
,A^{-1}=\begin{bmatrix}
I & 0 & 0\\
Z & I & 0\\
X & Y & I
\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Solve for matrices Z, X, and Y

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



I started by equating the product of those partitioned matrices to a partitioned identity matrix:

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}
I & 0 & 0\\
C & 0 & 0\\
A & B & I
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
I & 0 & 0\\
Z & I & 0\\
X & Y & I
\end{bmatrix}
= \begin{bmatrix}
I & 0 & 0\\
0 & I & 0\\
0 & 0 & I\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Then My multiplying out the entries and comparing them to the expected corresponding entries in the identity matrix, I generated some equations:

[tex]C+Z=0 \to Z=-C[/tex]

[tex]A+BZ+X=0 \to X=-B(-C)-A \to X=BC-A[/tex]

[tex]B+Y=0 \to B=-Y[/tex]

Therefore:
[tex]Z=-C, X=BC-A, B=-Y[/tex]

Am I right in my method, or am I out to lunch? Hopefully I broke no rules in my multiplication of the sub-matrices..

Any advice would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Looks good, but you probably want to express [tex] Y = -B[/tex] in case you have a pedantic grader that might take points off. Also you have a typo in the center element of the original matrix (center element is I instead of 0), but you seem to have used the correct matrix for your calculation.
 
  • #3
fzero said:
Looks good, but you probably want to express [tex] Y = -B[/tex] in case you have a pedantic grader that might take points off. Also you have a typo in the center element of the original matrix (center element is I instead of 0), but you seem to have used the correct matrix for your calculation.

Oops! Yeah, you're right -- it is a typo. I used I in my calculation.

And yep, you're correct. He'll want it as [tex]Y=-B[/tex].. Not sure why I changed it around.

Thanks a heap!
 

FAQ: Solving for Values in an Inverse Partitioned Matrix

What is an inverse partitioned matrix?

An inverse partitioned matrix is a square matrix that has been partitioned into smaller submatrices. The submatrices are then rearranged in a specific order to create a new matrix.

How is solving for values in an inverse partitioned matrix useful?

Solving for values in an inverse partitioned matrix allows us to manipulate and rearrange the original matrix in a way that makes it easier to solve complex equations and systems of equations. It also helps us to analyze and understand the relationships between different variables within the matrix.

What methods can be used to solve for values in an inverse partitioned matrix?

Some common methods include Gaussian elimination, Cramer's rule, and using inverse matrices. These methods involve using a combination of operations such as row operations and matrix multiplication to isolate and solve for the desired values.

What challenges may arise when solving for values in an inverse partitioned matrix?

One challenge is ensuring that the partitioned submatrices are rearranged correctly in order to create the new matrix. Another challenge is keeping track of the operations performed on the matrix and applying them accurately. Additionally, the calculations can become complex and time-consuming, especially for larger matrices.

How can solving for values in an inverse partitioned matrix be applied in real-world scenarios?

Inverse partitioned matrices are commonly used in the fields of engineering, physics, and economics to solve systems of equations and analyze relationships between variables. They are also used in computer graphics and image processing to manipulate and transform images.

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
732
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top