MHB Solving g(x)-h(x) <0: Find a, b, c, d

  • Thread starter Thread starter Manal
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the inequality g(x) - h(x) < 0, where g(x) is defined as the absolute value of f(x) and h(x) is a quadratic function. The analysis involves examining the behavior of f(x) across three intervals: x < 0, 0 < x < 1, and x > 1, leading to the formulation of cubic inequalities for each interval. For x < 0, the inequality simplifies to x^3 + 3x + 1 < 0, while for 0 < x < 1, it becomes x^3 + 5x - 1 > 0. Lastly, for x > 1, the inequality also results in x^3 + 3x + 1 > 0, indicating the need to find the intervals where these conditions hold true.
Manal
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We have :
f(x) =(1-x) ÷x, x is in IR*
g(x)=|f(x)|
h(x) =4-x^2
Solve g(x)-h(x) <0 (not with a graph)
( I tried solving so , S=]a, b[ U ]c,d[., but i don't know what are a, b, c and d. I would appreciate the help a bunch)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since $$\left|\frac{1-x}{x}\right|=\frac{|1-x|}{|x|}$$, absolute values can be eliminated on each of the intervals $(-\infty,0)$, $(0,1)$ and $[1,\infty)$ where $1-x$ and $x$ have definite signs. On each interval you get a cubic inequality.
 
[math]f(x)= \frac{1- x}{x}= \frac{1}{x}- 1[/math] is 0 at x= 1 and is not continuous at x= 0. Those are the only places f can change sign. If x= -1, f(-1)= -2 so f(x) is negative for all x less than 0. If x= 1/2 f(1/2)= 2- 1= 1 so f(x) is positive for all x between 0 and 1. Finally, if x= 2, f(x)= 1/2- 1= -1/2 so x is negative for all x greater than 1.

g(x)= |f(x)|= 1- 1/x for x< 0
g(x)= 1/x- 1 for 0< x< 1
g(x)= 1- 1/x for 1< x.

If x< 0, g(x)- h(x)= 1- 1/x- 4- x^2= -x^2- 1/x- 3 for x< 0 so you want to solve -x^2- 1/x- 3< 0. Multiplying by -x, which is positive, x^3+ 3x+ 1< 0.

If 0< x< 1, g(x)- h(x)= 1/x- 1- 4- x^2= -x^2+ 1/x- 5 so you want to solve -x^2+ 1/x- 5< 0. Multiplying by -x, which is negative, x^3+ 5x- 1> 0.

If x> 1, g(x)- h(x)= 1-1/x- 4- x^2= -x^2- 1/x- 3 so you want to solve -x^2- 1/x- 3<0. Multiplying by -x, which is negative, x^3+ 3x+ 1> 0.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
673
Back
Top