Solving Mechanics IIT-JEE Homework: Find Min Mass & Time Between Collisions

  • Thread starter zorro
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mechanics
In summary, the conversation discusses the scenario of a ball of mass M colliding with two identical balls, each of mass m, connected by a massless spring with spring constant k. The collision is assumed to be central, elastic, and instantaneous. The conversation delves into finding the minimum value of M for the incident ball to strike the system of two balls again, as well as the time elapsed between the two collisions. The solution involves using Newton's Law of Reaction and Conservation of Momentum to find the velocities of the masses involved in the first collision. Then, by changing the reference frame to the center of mass, the equations of motion for the two masses performing simple harmonic motion can be derived. Finally, by using the initial conditions of
  • #1
zorro
1,384
0

Homework Statement



A ball of mass M moving with velocity v on a frictionless surface strikes the first of two identical balls, each of mass m = 2 kg, connected by a massless spring with spring constant k = 1 kg/s2. Consider the collision to be central and elastic and essentially instantaneous. (see the attached fig.)

(a) Find the minimum value of the mass M for the incident ball to strike the system of two balls again.
(b) How much time will elapsed between the two collisions?


The Attempt at a Solution



This is my thought process. We use Newton' LOR and Conservation of momentum to find out the final absolute velocities of the masses involved in first collision. Next, we can find out the displacements of the connected masses and the mass M from the initial position.

These are my values up to the above analysis:

v1 = velocity of mass 'm' after collision
v2= " " " 'M' " "

v1= 2v/1+k
v2= v(1-k)/(1+k) where k=m/M

x1=2vt/(1+k)
x2= vt(1-k)/(1+k)

I don't have any idea after this :|
Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 316
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Any genius in mechanics out there?
 
  • #3
Next time, you should post in the introductory physics forum. I think there are more instructors willing to help there :wink:
After the collision, change your reference frame to the frame of COM of the 2 masses m and see what happens :wink:
 
  • #4
hikaru1221 said:
I think there are more instructors willing to help there :wink:

Yeah you are right, there are more instructors who are willing to help in IP, its a different thing that they are unable to help :biggrin: (I have no problem in posting in IP, but I had a bad experience with such type of questions there which require higher thinking skills)
hikaru1221 said:
After the collision, change your reference frame to the frame of COM of the 2 masses m and see what happens :wink:

Ok, then I will get the velocities of the two masses w.r.t the centre of mass. They move towards each other.

X1,CM = vt/1+k , X2,CM=-vt/1+k

Here 2 stands for the second mass 'm'.

The two masses execute SHM. I have no idea how mass of M can be related here.
 
  • #5
Uhh, I think you're underestimating them :rolleyes:
The 2 masses m's perform SHM, while M moves with constant velocity. Then write down the equations of coordinates of M and the mass m nearer to M. If they collide again then...
P.S.: I don't think x1 in post #1 is correct. It's supposed to be SHM, right? :wink:
 
  • #6
hikaru1221 said:
If they collide again then...

the two co-ordinates are equal.

hikaru1221 said:
P.S.: I don't think x1 in post #1 is correct. It's supposed to be SHM, right? :wink:

Yeah, that's valid until the first collision of two connected masses.

I have a problem writing the equation for SHM.
X=Asin(ωt+ϕ)
here A = vt/1+k and ω=(2k/m)1/2

Shall I take ϕ=0 at t=0? then equate the X above with the co-ordinate of bigger mass? I am getting stuck in this.
 
  • #7
Abdul Quadeer said:
Yeah, that's valid until the first collision of two connected masses.

Huh? :confused:
Before the first collision, the 2m don't even move, so how come x1 change with time before collision?

I have a problem writing the equation for SHM.
X=Asin(ωt+ϕ)
here A = vt/1+k and ω=(2k/m)1/2

Shall I take ϕ=0 at t=0?

Why? That's correct by the way :wink: But you should reconsider A, or x1.

then equate the X above with the co-ordinate of bigger mass? I am getting stuck in this.

Yep.
 
  • #8
hikaru1221 said:
Huh? :confused:
Before the first collision, the 2m don't even move, so how come x1 change with time before collision?

Sorry I misunderstood some thing.
hikaru1221 said:
Why? That's correct by the way :wink: But you should reconsider A, or x1.

Ah yes A is wrong. From energy conservation, I got A=vt/ω(1+k)

I am still confused if ϕ=0 or not.
At t=0, the mass m and M collide. This initial position of 'm' is not its mean position, right?
Its mean position occurs at the instant when the two smaller masses collide.
 
  • #9
Abdul Quadeer said:
Ah yes A is wrong. From energy conservation, I got A=vt/ω(1+k)

Why is there vt? Amplitude changes with time? :wink:

I am still confused if ϕ=0 or not.
At t=0, the mass m and M collide. This initial position of 'm' is not its mean position, right?
Its mean position occurs at the instant when the two smaller masses collide.

How do the 2 smaller masses collide? Aren't they connected by a spring? :wink:
I think you're misunderstanding the whole phenomenon.
 
  • #10
hikaru1221 said:
Why is there vt? Amplitude changes with time? :wink:

Ignore 't' :redface:



hikaru1221 said:
How do the 2 smaller masses collide? Aren't they connected by a spring? :wink:
I think you're misunderstanding the whole phenomenon.

I used the wrong word there. I meant at the instant when the two smaller masses come to instantaneous rest from COM frame (maximum compression of the spring).
 
  • #11
Initial position = position at t=0 :smile:
So phi doesn't have to be equal to 0. Just use the initial conditions to solve the problem:
_ At t=0, x_m = 0, v_m = -v1 (moving towards the other mass m)
_ We have: x_m = Asin(wt + phi), and so: v_m = Awcos(wt + phi).
_ Plug the values in and solve for A and phi. You have 2 unknowns with 2 equations, then you can solve it :smile:
And you will see that phi is not 0 :smile:
 
  • #12
hikaru1221 said:
Initial position = position at t=0 :smile:
So phi doesn't have to be equal to 0. Just use the initial conditions to solve the problem:
_ At t=0, x_m = 0, v_m = -v1 (moving towards the other mass m)
_ We have: x_m = Asin(wt + phi), and so: v_m = Awcos(wt + phi).
_ Plug the values in and solve for A and phi. You have 2 unknowns with 2 equations, then you can solve it :smile:
And you will see that phi is not 0 :smile:

Initial position = x_m=0 at t=0 so ϕ=0
I already got A earlier, = v/ω(1+k)

How do I put a constraint on M?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Abdul Quadeer said:
Initial position = x_m=0 at t=0 so ϕ=0

What about phi = pi/2? :wink: Don't take the math in physics so lightly.

Now get the motion equation for M. Should the masses collide, the equation x_M = x_m must have solution. Find the condition.
 
  • #14
hikaru1221 said:
What about phi = pi/2? :wink: Don't take the math in physics so lightly.

x_m = Asin(wt + phi)
x_m=0 at t=0

S0
0=Asin(phi)
If phi =pi/2 the equation is not valid!, so phi=0!

Do you get what I am talking about?
Xm = Asinwt + Xcm
XM=vt(1-k)/(1+k)

solving them, I got
sinwt = -wtk

How do I solve this equation?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Abdul Quadeer said:
x_m = Asin(wt + phi)
x_m=0 at t=0

S0
0=Asin(phi)
If phi =pi/2 the equation is not valid!, so phi=0!

Do you get what I am talking about?

Oops, I'm sorry, typo, it should be phi = pi, not pi/2 :redface:

XM=vt(1-k)/(1+k)

Is it? Have you switched to the reference frame of COM yet? :wink:

Let me go through this:

1/ Right after the collision, in the reference frame of ground:
[tex]v = v_2 + kv_1[/tex]
[tex]v^2 = v_2^2 + kv_2^2[/tex]
Solve this:
[tex]v_2 = (1-k)v/(1+k)[/tex]
[tex]v_1 = 2v/(1+k)[/tex]
[tex]v_{COM} = v_1/2 = v/(1+k)[/tex]
However, notice that we implicitly assume the +ve is in the same direction as [tex]\vec{v}[/tex] (or to the right, as in the picture).

2/ Switching to the reference frame of COM:
Now it's important to notice that the we can choose +ve to be either to the right or to the left. I'll choose it to the right, consistent with above.
[tex]v'_2 = v_2 - v_{COM} = -kv/(1+k)[/tex]
[tex]v'_1 = v_1 - v_{COM} = v/(1+k)[/tex]

Now choose the origin at the initial position of M and m right after the collision. We then have:
[tex]x_M = - kvt/(1+k)[/tex]
[tex]x_m = Asin(wt+\phi)[/tex]

The initial conditions for m are:
(1) [tex]x_m(0) = Asin\phi = 0[/tex]
(2) [tex]v_m(0) = Awcos\phi = v/(1+k)[/tex]
From (1), we have [tex]\phi[/tex] is either 0 or [tex]\pi[/tex]. For A>0, from (2), we can choose [tex]\phi = 0[/tex]. So: [tex]A = v/w(1+k)[/tex]. Notice that I have to take into account [tex]v_m(0)[/tex] and choose A>0, besides looking at [tex]x_m(0)[/tex] in order to get phi = 0.
Therefore:
[tex]x_m = \frac{v}{w(1+k)}sin(wt)[/tex]

Equate [tex]x_M[/tex] and [tex]x_m[/tex]:
[tex]- kvt/(1+k) = \frac{v}{w(1+k)}sin(wt)[/tex]
[tex]kwt = - sin(wt)[/tex] (***)

Now notice that in the reference frame of COM, [tex]v_M < 0[/tex] (M going away from m) and the smaller M is, the larger k be, the faster M "escapes" from m. Meanwhile, m is framed to perform SHM and cannot go anywhere farther than A. So in the extreme case, the next collision will occur at x = -A, or m already performs SHM for 3/4 of period, which means [tex]t = 3\pi /2w[/tex]. Substitute this into (***), and we obtain M = ... That's the minimum M needed.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
hikaru1221 said:
Is it? Have you switched to the reference frame of COM yet? :wink:

I switched back to the ground frame, that's why I added the Xcm term in Xm = Asinwt + Xcm
:wink:


hikaru1221 said:
Now notice that in the reference frame of COM, [tex]v_M < 0[/tex] (M going away from m) and the smaller M is, the larger k be, the faster M "escapes" from m. Meanwhile, m is framed to perform SHM and cannot go anywhere farther than A. So in the extreme case, the next collision will occur at x = -A, or m already performs SHM for 3/4 of period, which means [tex]t = 3\pi /2w[/tex]. Substitute this into (***), and we obtain M = ... That's the minimum M needed.


Yeah I had a problem there.
Its fine now.
I got the answer as 2m/3(pi) (approx.)

Thanks for your precious time and help :smile:
 

FAQ: Solving Mechanics IIT-JEE Homework: Find Min Mass & Time Between Collisions

What is the basic approach to solving mechanics problems for IIT-JEE?

The basic approach to solving mechanics problems for IIT-JEE is to first understand the given problem and identify the key concepts, principles, and equations that are relevant. Then, break down the problem into smaller, more manageable parts and apply the appropriate equations and principles to solve for the desired quantity.

How do I find the minimum mass required for a collision in a mechanics problem?

To find the minimum mass required for a collision, you can use the conservation of momentum principle, which states that the total momentum before a collision is equal to the total momentum after the collision. Set up an equation with the initial and final momentums and solve for the unknown mass.

What is the significance of finding the time between collisions in a mechanics problem?

The time between collisions is an important parameter in mechanics problems as it gives an indication of how often the objects involved in the collisions will interact with each other. It can also help determine the overall motion and behavior of the objects in the system.

How can I improve my problem-solving skills in mechanics for IIT-JEE?

Practice is key to improving your problem-solving skills in mechanics for IIT-JEE. Make sure to understand the underlying concepts and principles and solve a variety of problems to gain a better understanding of how to approach different types of problems.

Can I use a calculator to solve mechanics problems in IIT-JEE?

Yes, you can use a calculator to solve mechanics problems in IIT-JEE. However, it is important to first understand the concepts and principles behind the equations and use the calculator as a tool to aid in calculations, rather than relying solely on it.

Back
Top