MHB Solving Quadratic Equations without CD: Better Direction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores a method for solving quadratic equations without relying on traditional approaches. It suggests using a substitution, setting u = x + x^{-1}, which simplifies the problem into a cubic equation. The cubic equation u^3 + u^2 - 2u - 30 is factored, leading to solutions for u. Completing the square in x allows for the determination of specific roots based on the value of u. This method provides a streamlined approach to solving quadratic equations effectively.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
image_58c02a2c-ed92-432b-b126-3cc91b934a6920220115_111052.jpg

ok this was posted on LinkedIn and sure it has already be answered
but usually these types of problems are resolved by way too many steps
so just wanted to proceed with this without looking at previous attempts

my first reaction was to get a CD but would introduce a bigger problem
however with the exp i presume you could do this by Quadratics and grouping

or is there a better direction?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Set u = x + x^{-1}. Then x^2 + x^{-2} = u^2 - 2 and x^3 + x^{-3} = u^3 - 3u so that u^3 + u^2 - 2u - 30 = (u- 3)(u^2 + 4u - 10) = 0. Then completing the square in x gives <br /> (2x - u)^2 = u^2 - 4 and the choice u = 3 leads directly to <br /> (2x - 3)^2 = 5. The other roots u = -2 \pm \sqrt{14} lead to <br /> x^2 + 2x \mp \sqrt{14}x + 1 = 0.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dextercioby, fresh_42 and topsquark
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top