Solving the Indefinite Integral: \int\sqrt{28x-x^2} dx

  • Thread starter talk2glenn
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integral
In summary, the conversation discusses solving an indefinite integral using various substitution methods. The final solution involves a trigonometric substitution and simplification of terms. The answer provided by the computer differs slightly from the expected solution, but it is determined that the error was due to a mistake in data entry and simplification. The conversation ends with the individual attempting to correct the mistake and resolve the discrepancy.
  • #1
talk2glenn

Homework Statement



Evaluate the indefinite integral.

[itex]\int\sqrt{28x-x^2} dx[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[itex]\int\sqrt{196-(x-14)^2} dx[/itex]
Completing the square​

[itex]u=x-14[/itex]

[itex]du=dx[/itex]

[itex]\int\sqrt{196-u^2} du[/itex]
u substitution​

[itex]u=14sin\theta[/itex]

[itex]du=14cos\theta d\theta[/itex]
Trig substitution​

[itex]\int\sqrt{196cos^2\theta} 14cos\theta d\theta[/itex]

[itex]\int14cos\theta*14cos\theta d\theta[/itex]

[itex]98\int1+cos2\theta d\theta[/itex]

[itex]98(\theta+sin\theta*cos\theta) + C[/itex]

[itex]98(arcsin(u/14)+(u/14)(\sqrt{196-u^2}/14)[/itex]
Solve for Theta​

From here I should be able to just sub in for u and arrive at my answer. Unfortunately, it is close but no correct, and I can't see where I'm going wrong. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What's the answer you're getting and what's the answer you're supposed to get. I don't see any errors in what you've written, but perhaps its a simplification error.
 
  • #4
Thanks for the prompt replies :)

So it appears my problem is either data entry or substitution; that's a good sign. Here is my final solution exactly as I've entered it in our software:

98(arcsin((x-14)/14)+(x-14)sqrt(x^2-28x)/2)

Sorry if that's not to pretty; here's the image of the same input:

[PLAIN]http://webwork.asu.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/equations/a6/bd057be8bc635789c21be6e19460f51.png

Comparing it to the Wolfram output, it looks close but not identical. Then again, the computer tends to do some crazy simplification at the end; maybe they're equivalent. See: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+sqrt(28x-x^2)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
talk2glenn said:
Thanks for the prompt replies :)

So it appears my problem is either data entry or substitution; that's a good sign. Here is my final solution exactly as I've entered it in our software:

98(arcsin((x-14)/14)+(x-14)sqrt(x^2-28x)/2)

Doesn't that last term need to be

[tex]\frac{(x-14)\sqrt{28x-x^2}}{196}[/tex]

So you need to switch the entries in your root around. and I don't really see why you only divide by 2.

Sorry if that's not to pretty; here's the image of the same input:

[PLAIN]http://webwork.asu.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/equations/a6/bd057be8bc635789c21be6e19460f51.png

Comparing it to the Wolfram output, it looks close but not identical. Then again, the computer tends to do some crazy simplification at the end; maybe they're equivalent. See: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+sqrt(28x-x^2)

The wolfram output is correct. However, wolfram uses an entirely different algorithm to calculate this. So the answers can look pretty different...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
You're right; I see my error now. On paper, I distributed the 98*stuff/196 and got stuff/2, but when I entered it I kept the 98 as a factor. Edit: And you're right about the order too- I reversed it. Always rushing these things at the end.

Let me try that and see what happens. Thanks again!
 

FAQ: Solving the Indefinite Integral: \int\sqrt{28x-x^2} dx

What is "The (im)Possible Integral"?

"The (im)Possible Integral" is a mathematical concept that was first introduced by mathematician Paul du Bois-Reymond in the 19th century. It refers to a type of integral that cannot be solved using traditional methods, leading to infinite or undefined results.

Why is it called "(im)Possible"?

The term "impossible" is used because it is not possible to find a finite solution to this type of integral. The use of "(im)" signifies that while it may seem impossible to solve, there is still some potential for a solution.

How is "The (im)Possible Integral" different from a regular integral?

The main difference is that a regular integral has a finite solution, while the (im)possible integral does not. It also requires a different approach or set of techniques to attempt to solve it.

What are some real-world applications of "The (im)Possible Integral"?

The (im)possible integral has been used in physics and engineering, such as in calculating the surface area of a black hole or determining the stability of a bridge. It is also used in theoretical mathematics and is a subject of interest for mathematicians.

Is there any progress in solving "The (im)Possible Integral"?

There have been various attempts to solve the (im)possible integral, but as of now, it remains an unsolved problem in mathematics. However, advancements in technology and new mathematical techniques may provide a solution in the future.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top