Solving without using differentiation?

In summary, the student is attempting to use the kinematic equations to solve for the net force on an object that is moving in a plane, but is having trouble getting the equations to work correctly because they are only valid for motion under constant acceleration.
  • #1
DannyPhysika
30
0

Homework Statement

Hi all, I'm trying to understand why my second way of solving this problem doesn't work:

A 3.00kg object is moving in a plane, with its x and y coordinates given by x= 5t^2–1 and y=3t^3 + 2, where x and y are in meters and t is in seconds. Find the magnitude of the net force acting on this object at t = 2.00s

Homework Equations



xf = xi + vi(t) + (1/2)a(t^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I've found the answer with differentiation but I don't think we are supposed to use differentiation in my class so I'm wondering why when I plug the numbers into one of the kinematic equations, I get the wrong answer? I evaluate the object's position at t = 2.00s to be (19 i + 26 j) m and now since I have two components of the objects final position:

19 m = (1/2)ax t^2
26 m = (1/2)ay t^2

to get the acceleration components in order to solve for the Force but this yields the wrong answer. Any clarification is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It looks like you're missing something in your bottom equations... What happened to your initial conditions?
 
  • #3
Falcons said:
It looks like you're missing something in your bottom equations... What happened to your initial conditions?

I guess I assumed that the initial velocity was zero because plugging t=0 into the derivative of the equations would get you 0 from the velocities? I used differentiation to come to that conclusion.

Oh wait a second, I guess the initial positions wouldn't be zero since plugging t = 0 would result in x-component of -1 and y-component of +2. I wonder if this would result in the right answer. I will try
 
  • #4
Good luck! It should work out.
 
  • #5
Well I plugged in my new values for initial position and got 46.9 N but I don't think that's the right answer.

19 m = -1 m + 0 + (1/2)ax(t^2)

ax = 10 m/s^2

26 m = 2 m + 0 + (1/2)ay(t^2)

ay = 12 m/s^2

so Fx = (3.00 kg)(10 m/s^2) = 30 N
and Fy = (3.00 kg)(12 m/s^2) = 36 N

Ft = 46.9 N

I'm pretty sure the answer is supposed to be around 112 N so I guess I'm missing something else? Hmm
 
  • #6
You're going to have trouble casting the y-component equation into the form

d = do + vo*t + (1/2) a*t2

because it has a dependency on t3.

When equations of motion have a t3 term, it's called a Jerk, and the form of the general equation becomes:

d = do + vo*t + (1/2) a*t2 + (1/6) J*t3

In such a case, the acceleration at time t becomes

a + J*t

So, cast your y-component equation into this general form and go at it.
 
  • #7
The kinematic equations you are trying to use are ONLY valid for motion under constant accleration. To see that that is true, take, take x = x0 + v0 + 1/2at^2 and differentiate it twice. Or, take a(t) = a = const. and integrate it twice to get back what you started with.

You see the inconsistency, right? x(t) and y(t) are either equal to this expression, OR they are equal to what was given in the problem. But not both.

In the x case, it still works, since the given x(t) is actually of this form -- it varies quadratically with t, and hence the x-acceleration is indeed constant.

In the y-case it doesn't work. y(t) varies cubically with t, which is not consistent with constant acceleration. Differentiate it twice and see what you get. You'll find that the y-acceleration isn't constant.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Wow ok thank you for that information about cubic degrees and their relation to constant acceleration, I will stick to my derivative answer but I was just curious as to other types of solutions because I know that many students in the class have not completed their differential calculus seeing as it is only a co-requisite to the Physics we're taking. Cheers!
 
  • #9
Well, just for fun, let's see what happens when we do it via the general form of the equation of motion that includes jerk.

You gave us:

x= 5t^2–1 and y=3t^3 + 2

which, cast into the general form, become the independent equations:

x(t) = (1/2)(10m/s2)t2 - 1m

y(t) = (1/6)(18m/s3)t3 + 2m

The acceleration at time t is then:

X-component: 10m/s2

Y-component: 0 + (18m/s3)t

So at time t = 2.00 seconds the net acceleration becomes,

[tex] a = \sqrt{10^2 + (18*2.00)^2} m/s^2 [/tex]

[tex] a = 37.363 m/s^2 [/tex]

and the net force is then

[tex] a*3.00 kg = 112 N [/tex]
 
  • #10
DannyPhysika said:
..but I was just curious as to other types of solutions because I know that many students in the class have not completed their differential calculus seeing as it is only a co-requisite to the Physics we're taking. Cheers!
It is preferred to take calculus as a prerequisite prior to taking calculus based physics, but sometimes they are taken concurrently, and it places the student at a disadvantage when trying to understand the derivations of formulae or doing problems with non constant acceleration and forces, etc. Fortunately, most problems in Intro Physics get into the calculus mostly only for derivations or very basic problem solving.
 

FAQ: Solving without using differentiation?

What is differentiation and why is it important in solving equations?

Differentiation is a mathematical process used to find the rate of change of a function. It is important in solving equations because it allows us to determine the slope of a curve at any given point, which is crucial in finding the maximum and minimum values of a function.

Can we solve equations without using differentiation?

Yes, it is possible to solve equations without using differentiation. There are other methods such as substitution, elimination, and graphing that can be used to solve equations.

What are some advantages of solving equations without using differentiation?

One advantage is that it can be easier to understand and visualize the solution process without the use of complex mathematical concepts. It also allows for multiple approaches to solving a problem, which can be helpful in finding the most efficient solution.

Are there any limitations to solving equations without using differentiation?

Yes, there are certain types of equations that may be difficult to solve without using differentiation. For example, equations involving trigonometric or exponential functions may require the use of differentiation to find the solution.

How can I improve my problem-solving skills without relying on differentiation?

Practice is key in improving problem-solving skills. Try solving a variety of equations using different methods, and challenge yourself to find the most efficient solution. It can also be helpful to seek out resources or work with a tutor to learn new problem-solving techniques.

Back
Top