- #1
Barry-O-Genesis
- 1
- 0
- TL;DR Summary
- I have some basic questions about how protons and anti-protons are formed.
I'm trying to follow Scott Dodelson's Modern Cosmology. Specifically Chapter 3. Coverage of the subject of baryogenesis appears to be missing from Dodleson's book, so I'm trying to reconstruct things on my own.
This represents the formula:$$n_p[T]=g_p\space (\frac{k_b\space m_p\space T}{2\pi \hbar})^{\frac{3}{2}}\space e^{-\frac{c^2m_p}{k_B\space T}}$$which should be the same as formula (3.6) in SI units. So, my questions are:
1. I'm a little confused about what this number is, exactly. Does this represent the number of protons in a unit volume as long as the protons are in equilibrium with their surroundings? If we're working in SI units, is this the number of protons that I'd find in a cubic meter as a function of temperature (time)?
2. Isn't there supposed to be some event that causes proton creation to eventually stop and for the change in proton density to be governed only by the expansion of space from that point out ("freeze-out")? Don't we need the reaction rate (##\gamma+\gamma=p+\bar p##) and the expansion rate (##H##) to know when "freeze-out" occurs? Where can I find a lucid discussion of this?
3. As I interpret this chart, the number of baryons today should be effectively zero. If the plasma stayed in equilibrium down to the 7 MeV range, then certainly the protons would have been converted into other particles (photons). Yes, I understand the same can be said of antimatter, but it seems like you don't even need anti-protons to make the argument that - according to this formula - there should be no protons (baryons) a ##0 MeV##. Am I reading this chart incorrectly?
This represents the formula:$$n_p[T]=g_p\space (\frac{k_b\space m_p\space T}{2\pi \hbar})^{\frac{3}{2}}\space e^{-\frac{c^2m_p}{k_B\space T}}$$which should be the same as formula (3.6) in SI units. So, my questions are:
1. I'm a little confused about what this number is, exactly. Does this represent the number of protons in a unit volume as long as the protons are in equilibrium with their surroundings? If we're working in SI units, is this the number of protons that I'd find in a cubic meter as a function of temperature (time)?
2. Isn't there supposed to be some event that causes proton creation to eventually stop and for the change in proton density to be governed only by the expansion of space from that point out ("freeze-out")? Don't we need the reaction rate (##\gamma+\gamma=p+\bar p##) and the expansion rate (##H##) to know when "freeze-out" occurs? Where can I find a lucid discussion of this?
3. As I interpret this chart, the number of baryons today should be effectively zero. If the plasma stayed in equilibrium down to the 7 MeV range, then certainly the protons would have been converted into other particles (photons). Yes, I understand the same can be said of antimatter, but it seems like you don't even need anti-protons to make the argument that - according to this formula - there should be no protons (baryons) a ##0 MeV##. Am I reading this chart incorrectly?
Last edited: